--- On Mon, 9/26/11, Rob Weir wrote:
> > --- On Sat, 9/24/11, Rob Weir wrote:
> > ...
> >> If I understand corectly, Apache considers MPL 1.1
> >> to be "weak copyleft" and we have some limited ways
> >> (as a binary of using it in our releases.
> >>
> >
> > Yes we can. I am not sure what a comp
FWIW,
It may be like fitting a square peg in a round hole but there is something
similar coming to Apache:
http://incubator.apache.org/opennlp/index.html
Pedro
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
>
> --- On Sat, 9/24/11, Rob Weir wrote:
> ...
>>
>> HunSpell code is tri-licensed under GPL/LGPL/MPL.
>>
>
> That particular licensing scheme is rather weird: LGPL
> implies that it can become GPL so you could just say
> dual licensed LGPL
Rob Weir ha scritto:
Individual dictionaries, however, can have their own license as you
know. So there may be some that we cannot include in the release, but
we can still point the user to.
Opera browser uses the same dictionaries of OOo and there is a dedicated
wizard that allows the user t
--- On Sat, 9/24/11, Rob Weir wrote:
...
>
> HunSpell code is tri-licensed under GPL/LGPL/MPL.
>
That particular licensing scheme is rather weird: LGPL
implies that it can become GPL so you could just say
dual licensed LGPL/MPL, and then, once you make something
pluggable, the GPL basically bec
+1
I don't want to send Apache back to the spell checker in
OOo 2.x, and the LO guys have made a nice job creating
independent Hunspell+lang dictionaries already.
What I am doing with MySpell is just making sure it doesn't
disappear so that if someone needs an alternative he/she/them
won't have t
- On Thu, 9/22/11, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
>
> From: Gianluca Turconi
> Subject: Re: ooo-myspell at apache-extras.org
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, giffu...@tutopia.com
> Date: Thursday, September 22, 2011, 10:41 AM
>
> 2011/9/22 Pedro F. Giffuni
>
>
> The case
2011/9/24 Andrea Pescetti
>
> But we need to open, at due time, a dedicated discussion on writing aids
> before saying that GPL dictionaries cannot be used. Shipping an older
> Italian dictionary (or no Italian dictionary at all) would be a huge
> regression and it would definitely lead to users
On 22/09/2011 Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
Hi Gianluca;
Is your work related to this version?
http://members.xoom.it/trasforma/ispell/
Just wondering if we have to contact them too.
Whatever this is, it is widely unrelated to the dictionary currently
included in OpenOffice.org 3.3. The best startin
On 21 September 2011 20:49, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> Hello guys;
>
> I have created a new project at apache-extras.org to preserve
> MySpell:
>
> http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/ooo-myspell/
This is great - thanks!
Ross
,
Pedro.
--- On Thu, 9/22/11, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
From: Gianluca Turconi
Subject: Re: ooo-myspell at apache-extras.org
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, giffu...@tutopia.com
Date: Thursday, September 22, 2011, 10:41 AM
2011/9/22 Pedro F. Giffuni
The case of the italian support is indeed
2011/9/22 Pedro F. Giffuni
The case of the italian support is indeed "special",
> and is something I am particularly interested in. The
> linguistico project seems to be particularly political:
> they have this long discourse on how "OpenSource is
> evil, free is good". Maybe the author of the or
Ciao Gianluca!
I am afraid there's nothing as a systematic approach
to this yet.
When the new grant is in we can see which dictionaries
SUN got an assignment for and relicense them under AL2.
(From some bugzilla issues I've seen it's evident they
did try to get the copyrights assigned).
I think
2011/9/21 Pedro F. Giffuni
> If some of the dictionary files can be relicensed under
> an Apache License I would consider including them there
> too but I would prefer to keep any copyleft stuff out of
> the new project.
>
BTW, is there any idea here about how to manage the dictionaries that we
14 matches
Mail list logo