Re: Updated Stats page

2012-10-23 Thread Kay Schenk
On 10/23/2012 12:14 PM, Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 10/23/2012 08:48 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:10 PM, jan iversen wrote: A report would serve the same purpose, and posted with regular intervals (like 1 month), with figures

Re: Updated Stats page

2012-10-23 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 10/23/2012 08:48 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: > >> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:10 PM, jan iversen >> wrote: >>> >>> A report would serve the same purpose, and posted with regular intervals >>> (like 1 month), with figures based on e.g. last month,

Re: Updated Stats page

2012-10-23 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 10/23/2012 08:48 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:10 PM, jan iversen wrote: A report would serve the same purpose, and posted with regular intervals (like 1 month), with figures based on e.g. last month, last half year. OK. I posted a snapshot of the downloads since AOO 3

Re: Updated Stats page

2012-10-23 Thread Louis Suárez-Potts
Thanks. Louis On 12-10-23, at 14:48 , Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:10 PM, jan iversen wrote: >> A report would serve the same purpose, and posted with regular intervals >> (like 1 month), with figures based on e.g. last month, last half year. >> > > OK. I posted a snapshot of

Re: Updated Stats page

2012-10-23 Thread jan iversen
+1 to both the page you just made and the idea of a new column with regular intervals. Jan. On 23 October 2012 20:48, Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:10 PM, jan iversen > wrote: > > A report would serve the same purpose, and posted with regular intervals > > (like 1 month), with f

Re: Updated Stats page

2012-10-23 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:10 PM, jan iversen wrote: > A report would serve the same purpose, and posted with regular intervals > (like 1 month), with figures based on e.g. last month, last half year. > OK. I posted a snapshot of the downloads since AOO 3.4.0 was released back in May: http://ww

Re: Updated Stats page

2012-10-23 Thread jan iversen
A report would serve the same purpose, and posted with regular intervals (like 1 month), with figures based on e.g. last month, last half year. jan. On 23 October 2012 18:00, Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:23 AM, jan iversen > wrote: > > +1, fine page. Monthly should be enough. >

Re: Updated Stats page

2012-10-23 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:23 AM, jan iversen wrote: > +1, fine page. Monthly should be enough. > > Would it be worth to consider to include the country discussion (e.g. list > top 5 countries, and the total number) ? > I'll take a look to see if there is anything interesting here. But my guess

Re: Updated Stats page

2012-10-23 Thread jan iversen
+1, fine page. Monthly should be enough. Would it be worth to consider to include the country discussion (e.g. list top 5 countries, and the total number) ? Jan. On 23 October 2012 17:20, Rob Weir wrote: > I've moved the download stats to its own page: > http://www.openoffice.org/stats/downloa

Updated Stats page

2012-10-23 Thread Rob Weir
I've moved the download stats to its own page: http://www.openoffice.org/stats/downloads.html That allowed me to give a fuller description of what the stats are, how they were gathered, etc. I think we should aim for this level of detail and transparency in any claims we make. This move then all