On 10/23/2012 12:14 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 10/23/2012 08:48 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:10 PM, jan iversen
wrote:
A report would serve the same purpose, and posted with regular intervals
(like 1 month), with figures
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 10/23/2012 08:48 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:10 PM, jan iversen
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> A report would serve the same purpose, and posted with regular intervals
>>> (like 1 month), with figures based on e.g. last month,
Am 10/23/2012 08:48 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:10 PM, jan iversen wrote:
A report would serve the same purpose, and posted with regular intervals
(like 1 month), with figures based on e.g. last month, last half year.
OK. I posted a snapshot of the downloads since AOO 3
Thanks.
Louis
On 12-10-23, at 14:48 , Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:10 PM, jan iversen wrote:
>> A report would serve the same purpose, and posted with regular intervals
>> (like 1 month), with figures based on e.g. last month, last half year.
>>
>
> OK. I posted a snapshot of
+1 to both the page you just made and the idea of a new column with regular
intervals.
Jan.
On 23 October 2012 20:48, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:10 PM, jan iversen
> wrote:
> > A report would serve the same purpose, and posted with regular intervals
> > (like 1 month), with f
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:10 PM, jan iversen wrote:
> A report would serve the same purpose, and posted with regular intervals
> (like 1 month), with figures based on e.g. last month, last half year.
>
OK. I posted a snapshot of the downloads since AOO 3.4.0 was released
back in May:
http://ww
A report would serve the same purpose, and posted with regular intervals
(like 1 month), with figures based on e.g. last month, last half year.
jan.
On 23 October 2012 18:00, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:23 AM, jan iversen
> wrote:
> > +1, fine page. Monthly should be enough.
>
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:23 AM, jan iversen wrote:
> +1, fine page. Monthly should be enough.
>
> Would it be worth to consider to include the country discussion (e.g. list
> top 5 countries, and the total number) ?
>
I'll take a look to see if there is anything interesting here. But my
guess
+1, fine page. Monthly should be enough.
Would it be worth to consider to include the country discussion (e.g. list
top 5 countries, and the total number) ?
Jan.
On 23 October 2012 17:20, Rob Weir wrote:
> I've moved the download stats to its own page:
> http://www.openoffice.org/stats/downloa
I've moved the download stats to its own page:
http://www.openoffice.org/stats/downloads.html
That allowed me to give a fuller description of what the stats are,
how they were gathered, etc. I think we should aim for this level of
detail and transparency in any claims we make.
This move then all
10 matches
Mail list logo