Le 29/06/11 23:05, Pedro F. Giffuni a écrit :
Hi Pedro,
I was particularly wondering about this one :
Name Version license
__
mysql-connector 1.1.0 GPL
The connector-c package from Mysql containing the libmysql library is
released under GPL2, at
2011.06.29. 23:05 keltezéssel, Pedro F. Giffuni írta:
snip
Note that some of them are also outdated. More
outdated tarballs independent of the license) and
the version *I* recommend are listed here:
snip
hsqldb 1.8.1
snip
This will cause incompatibility with
On Jun 29, 2011, at 7:14 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 08:48, Jens-Heiner Rechtien jhrecht...@web.de wrote:
On 06/24/2011 09:07 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
...
Which gets me thinking of the next topic, how exactly to import the
current OOo Hg repository into SVN. While Hg has
On 30 June 2011 07:10, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Umm, 100% fidelity to/of what? I would love to understand the
qualifications that attach to that statement, and how whatever that is can
be demonstrated/verified.
[T]hey both operate on odf files with 100% fidelity.
Hello everyone,
This is Erik Ma from IBM Symphony team. I am the Architect of Symphony. I
work on the project since 2002. I ever worked on
Infobox(Sidebar in Symphony), Stability, Performance, Java integration and
Mac OS X support.
I am a member(invited on regular basis) of OpenOffice.org
Hi ALL,
I am an IBMer from BeiJing, China. It is great to be part of
such a vital community.
I have been Lotus Symphony developer and tech lead in
the past 7 years. Now I am working as Lotus Symphony
Presentation lead, focusing on common used feature
development and usability enhancement.
Hi,
Am 29.06.2011 23:05, schrieb Pedro F. Giffuni:
Hi again;
I went through Mathias' list of external source tarballs.
The idea is to make sure that most of that stuff was updated
in FreeBSD and while doing that I checked the licenses.
I found the following licenses missing from the
Hello there --
The organization i work for has been building an application which uses
Openoffice.org -- technically it is a Openoffice UNO client application, and
we have been using the GPL 2 license for the application.
My question is whether the change over to the Apache license for
My question is whether the change over to the Apache license for openoffice
means we have to switch over to one of the Apache approved licenses ?
No, no need to switch your license in case of GPL3:
http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
Apache 2 software can therefore be
Hello Jin Hua. Welcome to the Apache OpenOffice project.
I see that you already have an Apache ID. This is good.
Could you add a row for yourself to this page:
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/people.html
Instructions for editing the webpage are here:
When we process new committers, we're asking them for a list of
preferred userids? Why is that so? Is that just in case there is a
conflict? (But that should be trivial to prevent by having them look
at the list of Apache ID's initially). Or are they set up with userid
aliases?
-Rob
I'd like to participate in the OOo project.
I'm a programmer and documentation editor.
Ted
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Ted Rolle, Jr. wrote:
I'd like to participate in the OOo project.
I'm a programmer and documentation editor.
Ted
A person does not request an id. Anyone can contribute to OOo by
sending patches to code or the web sites to this list. When the
committers see the patches they include them in
I'd like to reopen this question,since I haven't seen a resolution.
I'm hearing some proposing Bugzilla, because of familiarity and ease
of migration.
I'm also hearing some say that JIRA is superior.
I'm not really persuaded by either argument. I wonder if we could
briefly drill down into this
Why don't we just say [a-z0-9]+ ?
On Jun 30, 2011 11:09 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Basically it gives root@ an opportunity to select a different id
if the first one contains non-alphanumeric chars.
Nowadays if people look over the list of existing ids and present
just one
What Andy said, as well as:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#meritocracy
-Rob
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
Ted Rolle, Jr. wrote:
I'd like to participate in the OOo project.
I'm a programmer and documentation editor.
Ted
A
Patches welcome d00d.
- Original Message
From: Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thu, June 30, 2011 12:08:43 PM
Subject: Re: Why list of preferred userids ?
Why don't we just say [a-z0-9]+ ?
On Jun 30, 2011 11:09 AM, Joe Schaefer
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
I'd like to reopen this question,since I haven't seen a resolution.
I'm hearing some proposing Bugzilla, because of familiarity and ease
of migration.
I'm also hearing some say that JIRA is superior.
I'm not really
From this, is it more precise to say that OpenOffice.org and LibreOffice.org
provide 100% fidelity in interchange of documents with each other when
employing their common native format, ODF?
And the presumption for that is the common code base which is their common
inheritance assures that, at
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@openoffice.org
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
I'd like to reopen this question,since I haven't seen a resolution.
I'm hearing some proposing Bugzilla, because of familiarity and ease
of
--- On Thu, 6/30/11, Alexandro Colorado j...@openoffice.org wrote:
...
I can go to JIRA and find the feature list and compare it
with Bugzilla, and I can see there are some minor advantages,
Please do so :).
but I agree that the familiarity
of bugzilla is usually lower the learning
Isn't this related to certification programs? Speaking of which, does
anyone have a brief explanation and some links to any existing official
OOo certification or training or similar programs?
This is a major area for end users (and trainers, consultants, and the
like) that we need to figure
I was wondering, will we be using http://www.openoffice.org/, or be
using http://openofficeorg.apache.org/ in the future?
Good question.
I would prefer www.openoffice.org - people already know that domain.
I think there are other domains under ASF control - maybe there is a
chance to get
Random guess: openoffice.org will persist as the user portal
for the project, but $something.apache.org will be the project
homepage to encompass both development and documentation.
So it'll likely be some combination of both, as the ASF doesn't
quite have analogs for much of what is offered on
Dear all,
I'm wondering, is the OOo source on the Apache svn now? If not,
will it be moved onto the Apache svn? I would like to check some of the
old issues reported from our local community. I guess working on the hg
source is not a good idea.
--
Best regards,
imacat ^_*'
imacat wrote:
Dear all,
I'm wondering, is the OOo source on the Apache svn now? If not,
will it be moved onto the Apache svn? I would like to check some of the
old issues reported from our local community. I guess working on the hg
source is not a good idea.
The actual source code
--- On Thu, 6/30/11, Kai Ahrens kahr...@apache.org wrote:
From: Kai Ahrens kahr...@apache.org
Subject: Re: Some more strange files in the OOo code
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Pedro F. Giffuni giffu...@tutopia.com
Date: Thursday, June 30, 2011, 2:47 AM
Hi,
Am 29.06.2011 23:05,
Ted, if you're interested in contributing to end-user documentation,
you might look at the User Documentation Plan I have started on the
wiki:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/User+Documentation+Plan
--Jean
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 02:09, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
I'm assuming this is a mistake. Andrew: did you have something in mind here?
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 16:23, ar...@apache.org wrote:
Author: arist
Date: Thu Jun 30 20:23:17 2011
New Revision: 1141702
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1141702view=rev
Log: (empty)
Added:
On 06/30/2011 09:12 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Rob Weirapa...@robweir.com wrote:
I'd like to reopen this question,since I haven't seen a resolution.
I'm hearing some proposing Bugzilla, because of familiarity and ease
of migration.
I'm also hearing
Yes but then your templates need to have {% block %}
declarations for the inheritance to work. Basically
if you've ever programmed in django you have the full
power of it available to you (in perl). Instead of
thinking of the site as static, think of it as dynamic
with auto-caching turned on.
I also feel generally speaking that JIRA, if some templating is applied,
is much better for end users.
On 06/30/2011 10:00 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Jira is certainly the more popular of the two by a wide
margin here at the ASF. Infra uses jira just because we
had to pick one, and we get decent
On Jun 30, 2011, at 3:47 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Yes but then your templates need to have {% block %}
You mean like the following in skeleton.html?
{% block content %}{{ content|markdown }}{% endblock %}
declarations for the inheritance to work. Basically
if you've ever programmed
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:54, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@openoffice.org
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
I'd like to reopen this question,since I haven't seen a resolution.
I'm
Pretty much. Block inheritance is very powerful when used well.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 30, 2011, at 7:03 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jun 30, 2011, at 3:47 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Yes but then your templates need to have {% block %}
You mean like the following in
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 18:47, Pedro F. Giffuni giffu...@tutopia.com wrote:
--- On Thu, 6/30/11, Alexander Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Le 29/06/11 23:05, Pedro F. Giffuni a écrit :
Hi Pedro,
I was particularly wondering about this one :
Name
Version license
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 14:27, Pedro F. Giffuni giffu...@tutopia.com wrote:
...
I think the first Apache release it will be a good
opportunity to do all the big API/ABI changes, including
this. I think we should also use lucene 3.2, etc..
For my own education... what API we talking about here?
Greg Stein wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 14:27, Pedro F. Giffuni giffu...@tutopia.com wrote:
...
I think the first Apache release it will be a good
opportunity to do all the big API/ABI changes, including
this. I think we should also use lucene 3.2, etc..
For my own education... what API
--- On Thu, 6/30/11, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
wrote:
...
I think the first Apache release it will be a good
opportunity to do all the big API/ABI changes,
including
this. I think we should also use lucene 3.2, etc..
For my own education... what API we talking about here?
39 matches
Mail list logo
