On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Nov 2, 2012, at 1:40 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
>> On 01/11/2012 robert_weir wrote:
>>> We (IBM) have consulted with customers, internal users, other IBM product
>>> teams, on what our (IBM's) development priorities should be for the next
On Nov 2, 2012, at 1:40 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 01/11/2012 robert_weir wrote:
>> We (IBM) have consulted with customers, internal users, other IBM product
>> teams, on what our (IBM's) development priorities should be for the next
>> AOO release. Obviously, we're not the only ones with p
On 2 November 2012 20:34, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> On 11/2/12, Ian Lynch wrote:
> > On 2 November 2012 08:40, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> >
> >> On 01/11/2012 robert_weir wrote:
> >>
> >>> We (IBM) have consulted with customers, internal users, other IBM
> >>> product
> >>> teams, on what our (
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:45 PM, wrote:
> If you recall, Symphony won
> quite a lot of praise for its UI, and much of this was due to the sidebar
> panel. I think we can make a good argument that this approach, say
> compared to the MS Office "ribbon" is a better use of screen real-estate,
> esp
On 11/2/12, Ian Lynch wrote:
> On 2 November 2012 08:40, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
>> On 01/11/2012 robert_weir wrote:
>>
>>> We (IBM) have consulted with customers, internal users, other IBM
>>> product
>>> teams, on what our (IBM's) development priorities should be for the next
>>> AOO release.
Hello,
> From: Lei Wang [mailto:lei.wang.l...@gmail.com]
> No, this is property panel in the sidebar, not the sidebar framework.
>
> The sidebar framework looks like:
> http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/AOO_UX_Design_Exploration_-_Do
> cked_Task_Pane_Container_-_Tab_User_Interface_Design
Unfort
On 2 November 2012 08:40, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 01/11/2012 robert_weir wrote:
>
>> We (IBM) have consulted with customers, internal users, other IBM product
>> teams, on what our (IBM's) development priorities should be for the next
>> AOO release. Obviously, we're not the only ones with p
On 01/11/2012 robert_weir wrote:
We (IBM) have consulted with customers, internal users, other IBM product
teams, on what our (IBM's) development priorities should be for the next
AOO release. Obviously, we're not the only ones with priorities or
interests or opinions. We don't make AOO decisio
On 02.11.2012 03:29, Jorg Schmidt wrote:
-- A major UI enhancement, a sidebar framework for the editors, ported
over from Symphony, and including an API.
I hope I understand correctly that you mean the right side in the picture
http://www.file-extensions.org/imgs/app-picture/4561/ibm-lotus-sy
On 01.11.2012 17:45, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
A quick note, wearing my "IBM hat".
We (IBM) have consulted with customers, internal users, other IBM product
teams, on what our (IBM's) development priorities should be for the next
AOO release. Obviously, we're not the only ones with prioriti
KG01 - see comment inline
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:53 PM, jan iversen
> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for the note, however knowing IBM I had hoped that one of the
> >> official goals was t
If I didn't know better I'd swear you had been spying on my wishlist. If
IBM brought nothing else to the project it's customer focus is hugely
valuable. Many thanks Rob, one marketing guy very happy.
On 2/11/2012 8:52 AM, wrote:
> A quick note, wearing my "IBM hat".
>
> We (IBM) have consulted w
No, this is property panel in the sidebar, not the sidebar framework.
The sidebar framework looks like:
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/AOO_UX_Design_Exploration_-_Docked_Task_Pane_Container_-_Tab_User_Interface_Design
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Jorg Schmidt wrote:
>
> > -- A major UI enh
> -- A major UI enhancement, a sidebar framework for the editors, ported
> over from Symphony, and including an API.
I hope I understand correctly that you mean the right side in the picture
http://www.file-extensions.org/imgs/app-picture/4561/ibm-lotus-symphony.gif (OK,
this picture is sympho
Great! Thanks for sharing.
Peter
On 11/2/2012 12:45 AM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
A quick note, wearing my "IBM hat".
We (IBM) have consulted with customers, internal users, other IBM product
teams, on what our (IBM's) development priorities should be for the next
AOO release. Obviously,
On 11/01/2012 09:45 AM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
A quick note, wearing my "IBM hat".
We (IBM) have consulted with customers, internal users, other IBM product
teams, on what our (IBM's) development priorities should be for the next
AOO release. Obviously, we're not the only ones with pri
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:53 PM, jan iversen wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the note, however knowing IBM I had hoped that one of the
>> official goals was to help the development part of the community to get
>> stabilized.
>>
>
> This is what th
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:53 PM, jan iversen wrote:
> Thanks for the note, however knowing IBM I had hoped that one of the
> official goals was to help the development part of the community to get
> stabilized.
>
This was specifically product goals for the next release, as the
subject title sugges
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:53 PM, jan iversen wrote:
> Thanks for the note, however knowing IBM I had hoped that one of the
> official goals was to help the development part of the community to get
> stabilized.
>
This is what their costumers asked for, not IBM itself. Costumers dont care
about de
On 11/1/12 9:53 PM, jan iversen wrote:
> Thanks for the note, however knowing IBM I had hoped that one of the
> official goals was to help the development part of the community to get
> stabilized.
>
> I acknowledge that it is important for IBM to get an output of invested
> energy/time/money, but
Thanks for the note, however knowing IBM I had hoped that one of the
official goals was to help the development part of the community to get
stabilized.
I acknowledge that it is important for IBM to get an output of invested
energy/time/money, but I think IBM would benefit not only from features b
A quick note, wearing my "IBM hat".
We (IBM) have consulted with customers, internal users, other IBM product
teams, on what our (IBM's) development priorities should be for the next
AOO release. Obviously, we're not the only ones with priorities or
interests or opinions. We don't make AOO d
22 matches
Mail list logo
