Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
+1 Am 18.10.2011 18:27, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: In reply to this message on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, vote for the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. The Proposal text is at the October 12 version of wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integrate+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project. The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72 hours from now. A majority of approvals over disapprovals constitutes acceptance of the proposal. [ ] +1 approve [ ] 0 abstain [ ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons: GUIDELINES ANYONE MAY VOTE. BINDING VOTES for determining the outcome are those cast by any of the 54 PPMC members (to be listed in a separate message). When the same individual casts more than one vote, the last-dated vote during the ballot period is taken as the final vote from that individual. Votes made anywhere but as replies to the ooo-dev list with this subject are not counted. DO NOT DISCUSS THE VOTING ON THIS THREAD. This thread is for the votes themselves, including explanations for -1 votes. Any other discussion related to this ballot, including discussions with anyone about their vote, should be on a separate threat with subject beginning [VOTE][DISCUSS]. - Dennis E. Hamilton tools for document interoperability, http://nfoWorks.org/ dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
-Original Message- From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, 19 October 2011 2:52 AM Don't lecture me on voting, Gavin. Read the the Apache Voting Process [1], the section on Implications of Voting, with my emphasis: The tacit implications of voting should be spelt out in the community's guidelines. However, in no case may someone's vote be considered invalid if the implied commitment doesn't appear to be met; ***a vote is a formal expression of opinion, not of commitment*** The opinion which has been asked was: [ ] +1 approve [ ] 0 abstain [ ] -1 disapprove This is very precise. Nobody has asked if you want to put effort in it or not. If you want to express opinions, objections etc there was/is a discussion thread. I am expressing my opinion in this vote, and my opinion is not going to be limited to the three opinions that Dennis (or you) deigns to offer me. This opinion was not asked for. It was asked if you approve the forum joining or not. If it is arrogant to have an opinion beyond what you might have, then thank God for arrogance! I think you should think a bit more on what Gav has said. Cheers Christian [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html -Rob -Rob Gav... -Rob GUIDELINES ANYONE MAY VOTE. BINDING VOTES for determining the outcome are those cast by any of the 54 PPMC members (to be listed in a separate message). When the same individual casts more than one vote, the last-dated vote during the ballot period is taken as the final vote from that individual. Votes made anywhere but as replies to the ooo-dev list with this subject are not counted. DO NOT DISCUSS THE VOTING ON THIS THREAD. This thread is for the votes themselves, including explanations for -1 votes. Any other discussion related to this ballot, including discussions with anyone about their vote, should be on a separate threat with subject beginning [VOTE][DISCUSS]. - Dennis E. Hamilton tools for document interoperability, http://nfoWorks.org/ dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid -- http://www.grobmeier.de
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
+1 Just a mentor, but I welcome the forum as valued addition to the project with many nice people. For sure it will be an outstanding part of this project and even for the ASF. On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote: In reply to this message on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, vote for the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. The Proposal text is at the October 12 version of wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integrate+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project. The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72 hours from now. A majority of approvals over disapprovals constitutes acceptance of the proposal. [ ] +1 approve [ ] 0 abstain [ ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons: GUIDELINES ANYONE MAY VOTE. BINDING VOTES for determining the outcome are those cast by any of the 54 PPMC members (to be listed in a separate message). When the same individual casts more than one vote, the last-dated vote during the ballot period is taken as the final vote from that individual. Votes made anywhere but as replies to the ooo-dev list with this subject are not counted. DO NOT DISCUSS THE VOTING ON THIS THREAD. This thread is for the votes themselves, including explanations for -1 votes. Any other discussion related to this ballot, including discussions with anyone about their vote, should be on a separate threat with subject beginning [VOTE][DISCUSS]. - Dennis E. Hamilton tools for document interoperability, http://nfoWorks.org/ dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid -- http://www.grobmeier.de
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
Rob Weir wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 18:34:46 -0400: Don't lecture me on voting, Gavin. Read the the Apache Voting Process [1], the section on Implications of Voting, with my emphasis: You are being incredibly rude, and also incredibly out of line to teach ASF Members (for the second time in a day) how voting works.
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote: Rob Weir wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 18:34:46 -0400: Don't lecture me on voting, Gavin. Read the the Apache Voting Process [1], the section on Implications of Voting, with my emphasis: You are being incredibly rude, and also incredibly out of line to teach ASF Members (for the second time in a day) how voting works. Daniel, I'm not teaching you anything you don't know. I'm just reminding you of how voting actually works at Apache. I'll draw your attention to when the OOo incubation proposal was sent out, Sam sent out a ballot like this [1]: Please cast your votes: [ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation [ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation [ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation This vote will close 72 hours from now. However, the votes that were returned were [2]: Binding: +1: 41 --: 1 -0: 1 -1: 5 Non-binding: +1: 45 +0: 2 ±0: 1 -0: 1 -1: 8 I did not see any complaints at the time about how the votes were cast, including of the -0 from an IPMC member. Regards, -Rob [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/%3c4df24024.2040...@intertwingly.net%3E [2] http://markmail.org/message/ge5kh7yygl77ehha
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
+1 On 10/18/2011 9:27 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: In reply to this message on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, vote for the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. The Proposal text is at the October 12 version of wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integrate+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project. The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72 hours from now. A majority of approvals over disapprovals constitutes acceptance of the proposal. [ ] +1 approve [ ] 0 abstain [ ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons:
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
+1 Andreas Säger, aka Villeroy, moderator on the English forum.
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
On 2011/10/20 01:58, Andreas Säger said: +1 Andreas Säger, aka Villeroy, moderator on the English forum. +1 -- Best regards, imacat ^_*' ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc Woman's Voice News: http://www.wov.idv.tw/ Tavern IMACAT's http://www.imacat.idv.tw/ Woman in FOSS in Taiwan http://wofoss.blogspot.com/ OpenOffice.org http://www.openoffice.org/ EducOO/OOo4Kids Taiwan http://www.educoo.tw/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
+1 Rory O'Farrell RoryOF on OOo Forum -- Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
+1 (mentor / advisory vote) - Shane On 10/19/2011 2:36 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: +1 Rory O'FarrellRoryOF on OOo Forum
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
+1 and best wishes! --/tj/ On 10/18/2011 12:27, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: In reply to this message on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, vote for the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. The Proposal text is at the October 12 version of wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integrate+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project. The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72 hours from now.
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
+1 On 2011-10-18 10:27 AM Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: In reply to this message onooo-...@incubator.apache.org, vote for the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. The Proposal text is at the October 12 version of wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integrate+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project. The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72 hours from now. -- _ Larry I. Gusaas Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada Website: http://larry-gusaas.com An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind theirs. - Edgard Varese
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
On 18/10/2011 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integrate+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project [ ] +1 approve [ ] 0 abstain [ ] -1 disapprove +1 (approve) from me (among other things, a global moderator in the Italian Forum and a user happy to know that this valuable support channel will now become integral part of the OpenOffice.org project). Regards, Andrea.
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
+1 (as a mentor I always vote with the majority or to highlight an important issue if one is raised - I see no issues raised and so... +1) On 18 October 2011 17:27, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote: In reply to this message on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, vote for the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. The Proposal text is at the October 12 version of wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integrate+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project. The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72 hours from now. A majority of approvals over disapprovals constitutes acceptance of the proposal. [ ] +1 approve [ ] 0 abstain [ ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons: GUIDELINES ANYONE MAY VOTE. BINDING VOTES for determining the outcome are those cast by any of the 54 PPMC members (to be listed in a separate message). When the same individual casts more than one vote, the last-dated vote during the ballot period is taken as the final vote from that individual. Votes made anywhere but as replies to the ooo-dev list with this subject are not counted. DO NOT DISCUSS THE VOTING ON THIS THREAD. This thread is for the votes themselves, including explanations for -1 votes. Any other discussion related to this ballot, including discussions with anyone about their vote, should be on a separate threat with subject beginning [VOTE][DISCUSS]. - Dennis E. Hamilton tools for document interoperability, http://nfoWorks.org/ dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid -- Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
+1 Marcus Am 10/18/2011 06:27 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: [ ] +1 approve [ ] 0 abstain [ ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons:
RE: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
+1 -Original Message- From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 09:27 To: OOo-dev Apache Incubator Subject: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal In reply to this message on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, vote for the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. The Proposal text is at the October 12 version of wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integrate+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project. The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72 hours from now. A majority of approvals over disapprovals constitutes acceptance of the proposal. [X ] +1 approve [ ] 0 abstain [ ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons: [ ... ] smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote: In reply to this message on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, vote for the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. The Proposal text is at the October 12 version of wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integrate+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project. The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72 hours from now. A majority of approvals over disapprovals constitutes acceptance of the proposal. [ ] +1 approve [ ] 0 abstain [ ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons: +0, which does not means abstain but means I have no objections, but do not volunteer to help with the migration. -Rob GUIDELINES ANYONE MAY VOTE. BINDING VOTES for determining the outcome are those cast by any of the 54 PPMC members (to be listed in a separate message). When the same individual casts more than one vote, the last-dated vote during the ballot period is taken as the final vote from that individual. Votes made anywhere but as replies to the ooo-dev list with this subject are not counted. DO NOT DISCUSS THE VOTING ON THIS THREAD. This thread is for the votes themselves, including explanations for -1 votes. Any other discussion related to this ballot, including discussions with anyone about their vote, should be on a separate threat with subject beginning [VOTE][DISCUSS]. - Dennis E. Hamilton tools for document interoperability, http://nfoWorks.org/ dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
+1 - proviso is separate votes on Committers on ooo-private. Regards, Dave On Oct 18, 2011, at 9:27 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: In reply to this message on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, vote for the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. The Proposal text is at the October 12 version of wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integrate+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project. The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72 hours from now. A majority of approvals over disapprovals constitutes acceptance of the proposal. [ ] +1 approve [ ] 0 abstain [ ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons: GUIDELINES ANYONE MAY VOTE. BINDING VOTES for determining the outcome are those cast by any of the 54 PPMC members (to be listed in a separate message). When the same individual casts more than one vote, the last-dated vote during the ballot period is taken as the final vote from that individual. Votes made anywhere but as replies to the ooo-dev list with this subject are not counted. DO NOT DISCUSS THE VOTING ON THIS THREAD. This thread is for the votes themselves, including explanations for -1 votes. Any other discussion related to this ballot, including discussions with anyone about their vote, should be on a separate threat with subject beginning [VOTE][DISCUSS]. - Dennis E. Hamilton tools for document interoperability, http://nfoWorks.org/ dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
+1 2011.10.18. 18:27 keltezéssel, Dennis E. Hamilton írta: In reply to this message on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, vote for the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. The Proposal text is at the October 12 version of wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integrate+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project. The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72 hours from now. A majority of approvals over disapprovals constitutes acceptance of the proposal. [ ] +1 approve [ ] 0 abstain [ ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons: GUIDELINES ANYONE MAY VOTE. BINDING VOTES for determining the outcome are those cast by any of the 54 PPMC members (to be listed in a separate message). When the same individual casts more than one vote, the last-dated vote during the ballot period is taken as the final vote from that individual. Votes made anywhere but as replies to the ooo-dev list with this subject are not counted. DO NOT DISCUSS THE VOTING ON THIS THREAD. This thread is for the votes themselves, including explanations for -1 votes. Any other discussion related to this ballot, including discussions with anyone about their vote, should be on a separate threat with subject beginning [VOTE][DISCUSS]. - Dennis E. Hamilton tools for document interoperability,http://nfoWorks.org/ dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
+1 Jomar On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote: In reply to this message on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, vote for the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. The Proposal text is at the October 12 version of wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integrate+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project. The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72 hours from now. A majority of approvals over disapprovals constitutes acceptance of the proposal. [ ] +1 approve [ ] 0 abstain [ ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons: GUIDELINES ANYONE MAY VOTE. BINDING VOTES for determining the outcome are those cast by any of the 54 PPMC members (to be listed in a separate message). When the same individual casts more than one vote, the last-dated vote during the ballot period is taken as the final vote from that individual. Votes made anywhere but as replies to the ooo-dev list with this subject are not counted. DO NOT DISCUSS THE VOTING ON THIS THREAD. This thread is for the votes themselves, including explanations for -1 votes. Any other discussion related to this ballot, including discussions with anyone about their vote, should be on a separate threat with subject beginning [VOTE][DISCUSS]. - Dennis E. Hamilton tools for document interoperability, http://nfoWorks.org/ dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
+1 On 18/10/11 17:27, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: In reply to this message on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, vote for the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. The Proposal text is at the October 12 version of wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integrate+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project. The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72 hours from now. A majority of approvals over disapprovals constitutes acceptance of the proposal. [ ] +1 approve [ ] 0 abstain [ ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons: GUIDELINES ANYONE MAY VOTE. BINDING VOTES for determining the outcome are those cast by any of the 54 PPMC members (to be listed in a separate message). When the same individual casts more than one vote, the last-dated vote during the ballot period is taken as the final vote from that individual. Votes made anywhere but as replies to the ooo-dev list with this subject are not counted. DO NOT DISCUSS THE VOTING ON THIS THREAD. This thread is for the votes themselves, including explanations for -1 votes. Any other discussion related to this ballot, including discussions with anyone about their vote, should be on a separate threat with subject beginning [VOTE][DISCUSS]. - Dennis E. Hamilton tools for document interoperability,http://nfoWorks.org/ dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
+1 -- Ian Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications (The Schools ITQ) www.theINGOTs.org +44 (0)1827 305940 The Learning Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth, Staffordshire, B79 8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and Wales.
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
+1 - Don Harbison PPMC Member On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.orgwrote: In reply to this message on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, vote for the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. The Proposal text is at the October 12 version of wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integrate+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project . The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72 hours from now. A majority of approvals over disapprovals constitutes acceptance of the proposal. [ ] +1 approve [ ] 0 abstain [ ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons: GUIDELINES ANYONE MAY VOTE. BINDING VOTES for determining the outcome are those cast by any of the 54 PPMC members (to be listed in a separate message). When the same individual casts more than one vote, the last-dated vote during the ballot period is taken as the final vote from that individual. Votes made anywhere but as replies to the ooo-dev list with this subject are not counted. DO NOT DISCUSS THE VOTING ON THIS THREAD. This thread is for the votes themselves, including explanations for -1 votes. Any other discussion related to this ballot, including discussions with anyone about their vote, should be on a separate threat with subject beginning [VOTE][DISCUSS]. - Dennis E. Hamilton tools for document interoperability, http://nfoWorks.org/ dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
+1 -- ## Manfred Reiter
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
+1 On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.orgwrote: In reply to this message on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, vote for the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. The Proposal text is at the October 12 version of wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integrate+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project . The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72 hours from now. A majority of approvals over disapprovals constitutes acceptance of the proposal. [ ] +1 approve [ ] 0 abstain [ ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons: GUIDELINES ANYONE MAY VOTE. BINDING VOTES for determining the outcome are those cast by any of the 54 PPMC members (to be listed in a separate message). When the same individual casts more than one vote, the last-dated vote during the ballot period is taken as the final vote from that individual. Votes made anywhere but as replies to the ooo-dev list with this subject are not counted. DO NOT DISCUSS THE VOTING ON THIS THREAD. This thread is for the votes themselves, including explanations for -1 votes. Any other discussion related to this ballot, including discussions with anyone about their vote, should be on a separate threat with subject beginning [VOTE][DISCUSS]. - Dennis E. Hamilton tools for document interoperability, http://nfoWorks.org/ dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
+1 Original Message From: Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org To: OOo-dev Apache Incubator ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:27:12 -0700 In reply to this message on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, vote for the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. The Proposal text is at the October 12 version of wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integrate+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project. The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72 hours from now. A majority of approvals over disapprovals constitutes acceptance of the proposal. [ ] +1 approve [ ] 0 abstain [ ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons: GUIDELINES ANYONE MAY VOTE. BINDING VOTES for determining the outcome are those cast by any of the 54 PPMC members (to be listed in a separate message). When the same individual casts more than one vote, the last-dated vote during the ballot period is taken as the final vote from that individual. Votes made anywhere but as replies to the ooo-dev list with this subject are not counted. DO NOT DISCUSS THE VOTING ON THIS THREAD. This thread is for the votes themselves, including explanations for -1 votes. Any other discussion related to this ballot, including discussions with anyone about their vote, should be on a separate threat with subject beginning [VOTE][DISCUSS]. - Dennis E. Hamilton tools for document interoperability, http://nfoWorks.org/ dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
+1
RE: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
-Original Message- From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, 19 October 2011 2:52 AM To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote: In reply to this message on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, vote for the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. The Proposal text is at the October 12 version of wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integrat e+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project. The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72 hours from now. A majority of approvals over disapprovals constitutes acceptance of the proposal. [ ] +1 approve [ ] 0 abstain [ ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons: +0, which does not means abstain but means I have no objections, but do not volunteer to help with the migration. It means abstain if the vote says so. Nobody is volunteering to do anything when they vote, they are approving, or not, or no opinion. All those people giving their +1 are not also offering to help with the migration, but saying with a positive vote that it should happen. Stop being so obtuse please and go with the flow a bit more to let things happen. Guidance is appreciated I'm sure, but don't throttle. Gav... -Rob GUIDELINES ANYONE MAY VOTE. BINDING VOTES for determining the outcome are those cast by any of the 54 PPMC members (to be listed in a separate message). When the same individual casts more than one vote, the last-dated vote during the ballot period is taken as the final vote from that individual. Votes made anywhere but as replies to the ooo-dev list with this subject are not counted. DO NOT DISCUSS THE VOTING ON THIS THREAD. This thread is for the votes themselves, including explanations for -1 votes. Any other discussion related to this ballot, including discussions with anyone about their vote, should be on a separate threat with subject beginning [VOTE][DISCUSS]. - Dennis E. Hamilton tools for document interoperability, http://nfoWorks.org/ dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote: -Original Message- From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, 19 October 2011 2:52 AM To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote: In reply to this message on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, vote for the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. The Proposal text is at the October 12 version of wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integrat e+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project. The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72 hours from now. A majority of approvals over disapprovals constitutes acceptance of the proposal. [ ] +1 approve [ ] 0 abstain [ ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons: +0, which does not means abstain but means I have no objections, but do not volunteer to help with the migration. It means abstain if the vote says so. Nobody is volunteering to do anything when they vote, they are approving, or not, or no opinion. All those people giving their +1 are not also offering to help with the migration, but saying with a positive vote that it should happen. Stop being so obtuse please and go with the flow a bit more to let things happen. Guidance is appreciated I'm sure, but don't throttle. The attentive reader would note that I did not vote 0. I voted +0. My vote means exactly what I say it means, nothing more, nothing less. -Rob Gav... -Rob GUIDELINES ANYONE MAY VOTE. BINDING VOTES for determining the outcome are those cast by any of the 54 PPMC members (to be listed in a separate message). When the same individual casts more than one vote, the last-dated vote during the ballot period is taken as the final vote from that individual. Votes made anywhere but as replies to the ooo-dev list with this subject are not counted. DO NOT DISCUSS THE VOTING ON THIS THREAD. This thread is for the votes themselves, including explanations for -1 votes. Any other discussion related to this ballot, including discussions with anyone about their vote, should be on a separate threat with subject beginning [VOTE][DISCUSS]. - Dennis E. Hamilton tools for document interoperability, http://nfoWorks.org/ dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
Hi all, In reply to this message on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, vote for the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. +1 Just a note: I am an administrator and a global moderator of OpenOffice.org Community Forum Japanese. http://user.services.openoffice.org/ja/forum/ :) Thanks, khirano
RE: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
-Original Message- From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, 19 October 2011 8:17 AM To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote: -Original Message- From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, 19 October 2011 2:52 AM To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote: In reply to this message on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, vote for the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. The Proposal text is at the October 12 version of wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integra t e+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project. The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72 hours from now. A majority of approvals over disapprovals constitutes acceptance of the proposal. [ ] +1 approve [ ] 0 abstain [ ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons: +0, which does not means abstain but means I have no objections, +but do not volunteer to help with the migration. It means abstain if the vote says so. Nobody is volunteering to do anything when they vote, they are approving, or not, or no opinion. All those people giving their +1 are not also offering to help with the migration, but saying with a positive vote that it should happen. Stop being so obtuse please and go with the flow a bit more to let things happen. Guidance is appreciated I'm sure, but don't throttle. The attentive reader would note that I did not vote 0. I voted +0. My vote means exactly what I say it means, nothing more, nothing less. I read exactly what you wrote, do not think I am not attentive. Your arrogance around here lately is beyond belief, pack it in -Rob Gav... -Rob GUIDELINES ANYONE MAY VOTE. BINDING VOTES for determining the outcome are those cast by any of the 54 PPMC members (to be listed in a separate message). When the same individual casts more than one vote, the last-dated vote during the ballot period is taken as the final vote from that individual. Votes made anywhere but as replies to the ooo-dev list with this subject are not counted. DO NOT DISCUSS THE VOTING ON THIS THREAD. This thread is for the votes themselves, including explanations for -1 votes. Any other discussion related to this ballot, including discussions with anyone about their vote, should be on a separate threat with subject beginning [VOTE][DISCUSS]. - Dennis E. Hamilton tools for document interoperability, http://nfoWorks.org/ dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
+1 On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.auwrote: -Original Message- From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, 19 October 2011 8:17 AM To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote: -Original Message- From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, 19 October 2011 2:52 AM To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote: In reply to this message on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, vote for the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. The Proposal text is at the October 12 version of wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integra t e+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project. The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72 hours from now. A majority of approvals over disapprovals constitutes acceptance of the proposal. [ ] +1 approve [ ] 0 abstain [ ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons: +0, which does not means abstain but means I have no objections, +but do not volunteer to help with the migration. It means abstain if the vote says so. Nobody is volunteering to do anything when they vote, they are approving, or not, or no opinion. All those people giving their +1 are not also offering to help with the migration, but saying with a positive vote that it should happen. Stop being so obtuse please and go with the flow a bit more to let things happen. Guidance is appreciated I'm sure, but don't throttle. The attentive reader would note that I did not vote 0. I voted +0. My vote means exactly what I say it means, nothing more, nothing less. I read exactly what you wrote, do not think I am not attentive. Your arrogance around here lately is beyond belief, pack it in -Rob Gav... -Rob GUIDELINES ANYONE MAY VOTE. BINDING VOTES for determining the outcome are those cast by any of the 54 PPMC members (to be listed in a separate message). When the same individual casts more than one vote, the last-dated vote during the ballot period is taken as the final vote from that individual. Votes made anywhere but as replies to the ooo-dev list with this subject are not counted. DO NOT DISCUSS THE VOTING ON THIS THREAD. This thread is for the votes themselves, including explanations for -1 votes. Any other discussion related to this ballot, including discussions with anyone about their vote, should be on a separate threat with subject beginning [VOTE][DISCUSS]. - Dennis E. Hamilton tools for document interoperability, http://nfoWorks.org/ dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid -- This Apt Has Super Cow Powers - http://sourcefreedom.com
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote: -Original Message- From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, 19 October 2011 8:17 AM To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote: -Original Message- From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, 19 October 2011 2:52 AM To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote: In reply to this message on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, vote for the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. The Proposal text is at the October 12 version of wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integra t e+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project. The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72 hours from now. A majority of approvals over disapprovals constitutes acceptance of the proposal. [ ] +1 approve [ ] 0 abstain [ ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons: +0, which does not means abstain but means I have no objections, +but do not volunteer to help with the migration. It means abstain if the vote says so. Nobody is volunteering to do anything when they vote, they are approving, or not, or no opinion. All those people giving their +1 are not also offering to help with the migration, but saying with a positive vote that it should happen. Stop being so obtuse please and go with the flow a bit more to let things happen. Guidance is appreciated I'm sure, but don't throttle. The attentive reader would note that I did not vote 0. I voted +0. My vote means exactly what I say it means, nothing more, nothing less. I read exactly what you wrote, do not think I am not attentive. Your arrogance around here lately is beyond belief, pack it in Don't lecture me on voting, Gavin. Read the the Apache Voting Process [1], the section on Implications of Voting, with my emphasis: The tacit implications of voting should be spelt out in the community's guidelines. However, in no case may someone's vote be considered invalid if the implied commitment doesn't appear to be met; ***a vote is a formal expression of opinion, not of commitment*** I am expressing my opinion in this vote, and my opinion is not going to be limited to the three opinions that Dennis (or you) deigns to offer me. If it is arrogant to have an opinion beyond what you might have, then thank God for arrogance! [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html -Rob -Rob Gav... -Rob GUIDELINES ANYONE MAY VOTE. BINDING VOTES for determining the outcome are those cast by any of the 54 PPMC members (to be listed in a separate message). When the same individual casts more than one vote, the last-dated vote during the ballot period is taken as the final vote from that individual. Votes made anywhere but as replies to the ooo-dev list with this subject are not counted. DO NOT DISCUSS THE VOTING ON THIS THREAD. This thread is for the votes themselves, including explanations for -1 votes. Any other discussion related to this ballot, including discussions with anyone about their vote, should be on a separate threat with subject beginning [VOTE][DISCUSS]. - Dennis E. Hamilton tools for document interoperability, http://nfoWorks.org/ dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
On 10/18/2011 09:27 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: In reply to this message on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, vote for the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. The Proposal text is at the October 12 version of wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integrate+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project. The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72 hours from now. A majority of approvals over disapprovals constitutes acceptance of the proposal. [ ] +1 approve [ ] 0 abstain [ ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons: +1 from me --rest snipped -- -- MzK There is no such thing as coincidence. -- Leroy Jethro Gibbs, Rule #39
Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
+1
