Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing ooRexx 5.0?

Hi Michael, try: svn checkout svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/oorexx/code-0/main/trunk oorexx-code-0 best regards, René. > On 15 Jan 2019, at 13:35, Michael Lueck wrote: > > Greetings ooRexx'ers, > > Rick McGuire wrote: >> Also, with changes for rxapi, this really needs a longer beta-test to

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Welcome to the Haiku shell.

I will try that. Just my first few tries. On 01/15/19 12:37 PM, Enrico Sorichetti via Oorexx-devel wrote: For a cleaner stat64 and friends handling I would consider trying Like has been done for apple , something along the lines of #if defined(__APPLE__) || defined(__HAIKU__) # define lseek64

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Welcome to the Haiku shell.

For a cleaner stat64 and friends handling I would consider trying Like has been done for apple , something along the lines of #if defined(__APPLE__) || defined(__HAIKU__) # define lseek64 lseek # define open64 open // avoid warning: '(f)stat64' is deprecated: first deprecated in macOS 10.6 #

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing ooRexx 5.0?

Greetings ooRexx'ers, Rick McGuire wrote: Also, with changes for rxapi, this really needs a longer beta-test to make sure we've not overlooked any major issues. This tells me it is time to do a pull/build on the 1&1 Linux Shared Web Hosting server. How do I do the correct source code

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Welcome to the Haiku shell.

By the way, NetRexx is also running here. ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Welcome to the Haiku shell.

Starting patch for anyone who wants to fool around with it. https://github.com/agrellum/NetRexx-Samples/blob/master/haiku-oorexx.patch ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Welcome to the Haiku shell.

Still working on the CMakeLists patch ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing ooRexx 5.0?

Then we will not freeze. Can you give us a heads up when it is a convenient time to freeze? I was happy we did not freeze last time, because it gave us the rxapi and usb-install functionality, the gencat elimination and some more. best regards, René. > On 15 Jan 2019, at 11:51, Rick McGuire

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Welcome to the Haiku shell.

I am running on hardware. 2009 HP G60 laptop, amd64, 3 gigs (Everything works) I was running in Virtual Box on OpenIndiana ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Welcome to the Haiku shell.

Hi Jason, great work, as ever. To save us some googling: does it run in qemu, Virtual Box? Does it have a docker image? Can you set up (maybe in cooperation) a CMakeLists patch? best regards, René. > On 15 Jan 2019, at 11:44, Jason Martin wrote: > > ~> rexx -v > Open Object Rexx Version

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing ooRexx 5.0?

I am for it, but I think it is up to Erich and Rick. To be precise, I am for freezing, setting a date and prepare. I would like to have the oorexx.org website up to date before we announce. I did some work last year, which is accessible through oorexx.org/index2.html

[Oorexx-devel] Welcome to the Haiku shell.

~> rexx -v Open Object Rexx Version 5.0.0 r11668 Build date: Jan 15 2019 Addressing mode: 64 Copyright (c) 1995, 2004 IBM Corporation. All rights reserved. Copyright (c) 2005-2019 Rexx Language Association. All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials are made available under

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing ooRexx 5.0?

There is still documentation work that needs to be done, including doing a very thorough review of the docs. There are still tests that need to be written, and I'm working on a restructuring of rexxutil that is cleaning up a lot of potential problems in that code. Also, with changes for rxapi,

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing ooRexx 5.0?

I believe there is some documentation still to be done for the newer features but I would support a Release once that is done. However, I have not looked at all the RFEs and bugs to see what else might need to be done before we do that. Gil B. On 1/15/2019 9:15 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:

[Oorexx-devel] Releasing ooRexx 5.0?

What would be the thoughts about releasing the current trunk version of ooRexx 5.0 as "general available"? (In order for organisations/companies to adopt 5.0 or to replace older versions of Rexx/ooRexx with 5.0 it would be necessary that it becomes officially GA.) It would be still possible to