Re: [Oorexx-devel] Question ad .rexxinfo and CLS-samples ...

2020-03-15 Thread René Jansen
Thanks for pointing that out. The NetRexx discussion was about product release number, i.e. the number that the translator tells you in the logo. The code states ‘language level’ indeed, but as far as I can go back this was never different from the product release level. (It was a product only f

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Question ad .rexxinfo and CLS-samples ...

2020-03-15 Thread Enrico Sorichetti via Oorexx-devel
Probably that’ the reason why on zOS Parse version v Say v Reports REXX370 3.48 01 May 1992 Disregarding the Version whatever of the product ( TSO extensions ) Which delivers the rexx interpreter E > On 15 Mar 2020, at 13:45, Rick McGuire wrote: > > That is the language level, not

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Question ad .rexxinfo and CLS-samples ...

2020-03-15 Thread Rick McGuire
That is the language level, not a product release level. ooRexx also has a language level that is decimal in form, but that is only updated when there is a change to the language handled by the interpreter. Bug fixes would never bump that, nor would new class libraries. Rick On Sun, Mar 15, 2020

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Question ad .rexxinfo and CLS-samples ...

2020-03-15 Thread René Jansen
Not that I am really interested in this, but for your information: CMS and TSO Rexx traditionally has had a decimal version number: 3.40, 3.48. 4.02. This is without reason: its inventor is more involved with decimal arithmetic than the man in the street. There was a semi-heated discussion in the

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Question ad .rexxinfo and CLS-samples ...

2020-03-15 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
On 14.03.2020 21:51, Enrico Sorichetti via Oorexx-devel wrote: > There is a clash in the  nomenclature used by IBM software development  > And the one used in the *ix word  > > The IBM terminology is explained here > https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/vrmf-maintenance-stream-delivery-vehicle-termin

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Question ad .rexxinfo and CLS-samples ...

2020-03-14 Thread Enrico Sorichetti via Oorexx-devel
There is a clash in the nomenclature used by IBM software development And the one used in the *ix word The IBM terminology is explained here https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/vrmf-maintenance-stream-delivery-vehicle-terminology-explanation