Ok, to answer my own question, this looks like a system wide problem.
There's a discussion thread about this already on the sourceforge
discussion forums.
Rick
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to commit a small change to the code right now, and
I was just going to ask you if you had any problems. grin
I get this:
C:\work.ooRexx\3.x\interpretersvn commit -F ..\commit.msg
kernel\api\ThreadContextStubs.cpp
svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: MKACTIVITY of
'/svnroot/oorexx/!svn/act/5f26d6de-a6fe-ed4e-8746-91a1ba5f2a1c': 403
It looks like this is a scheduled outage:
http://sourceforge.net/community/forum/topic.php?id=2874pagereplies=1
Rick
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Mark Miesfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just going to ask you if you had any problems. grin
I get this:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like this is a scheduled outage:
http://sourceforge.net/community/forum/topic.php?id=2874pagereplies=1
This addition to the SVN service may be nice for us:
Tarball generation enabled within ViewVC, allowing users
Rick,
I made a couple of minor commits. I think the svn e-mail
notifications may not be working yet. You might want to do a svn
status -u if you are relying on the e-mail to know when a commit was
done.
Sendingkernel\api\ThreadContextStubs.cpp
Transmitting file data .
Committed
Yes, I just experienced the same thing. I was just about to post
something about this on the sourceforge forums.
Rick
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Mark Miesfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick,
I made a couple of minor commits. I think the svn e-mail
notifications may not be working yet.
Mark,
I have a small improvement to your one update to ThreadContextStubs
that I'll checkin once svn starts behaving again. Rather than do a
new_string(...)-upper() you can use new_upper_string(...), which
only creates a single object rather than two.
Rick
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Mark
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a small improvement to your one update to ThreadContextStubs
that I'll checkin once svn starts behaving again. Rather than do a
new_string(...)-upper() you can use new_upper_string(...), which
only creates a single
Hi David,
The build machine no longer builds the Windows version of the
interpreter. I have another post where I'm going to talk about
compiler versions.
The two threads are probably related. But, when I ask for a Windows
build, I don't even get the log output. If the build fails, there
still
The interpreter on Windows no longer builds under Visual C++ 6.0.
That is probably fixable, but before much time is spent on it we
should discuss the minimum compiler version we intend to support.
Obviously to build the 64-bit version we'll need a later compiler than
Visual C++ 6.0. But for the
10 matches
Mail list logo
