This little program:
Signal On Lostdigits
x=7
Do i=1 To 5
x=x+1
say x
End
Exit
lostdigits:
Say 'This is what SIZE is in PL/I'
shows this output:
8
9
1.E+9
1.E+9
1.E+9
I have expected that the lostdigits condition is trapped. It ain't!!.
From the documentation:
LOSTDIGITS
raised if a number used in an arithmetic operation has more digits than the
current setting of
NUMERIC DIGITS. Leading zeros are not counted in this comparison.
LOSTDIGITS only applies to the values used at the start of the calculation,
not with rounding
Can I trap this in any other way?
This came to mind but does not work either
Numeric Digits 30
x=x+1
Say x
Numeric Digits 9
z=x+0
Say z
Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com schrieb:
From the documentation:
LOSTDIGITS
raised if a number used in an arithmetic operation has more
I am working on this:
I want to implement this little and simple program using oodialog:
Do Until wordlist=''
word=subword(wordlist,random...)
display screen 1
upon enter
display screen 2
If respone=F1 Then drop the word
End
Say bye or display Bye bye
I can help you with this, give me a little bit of time to put something
together.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Walter Pachl
christel.u.w.pa...@chello.atwrote:
I am working on this:
I want to implement this little and simple program using oodialog:
Do Until wordlist=''
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Walter Pachl
christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at wrote:
And how about
x=11
Do i=1 To 5
Numeric dIGITS 30
x=x+1 - 12
Say x
Numeric Digits 9
z=x+0 - 1.E+9
Say z
End
I THINK you started by sending me a private mail :-(
I knew xou would!
THANKS in advance
Walter
Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com schrieb:
I can help you with this, give me a little bit of time to put something
--
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for
Looks like a boundary condition bug. The condition is raised for lengths
of digits+2, but not digits+1.
Rick
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Walter Pachl
christel.u.w.pa...@chello.atwrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Walter Pachl
christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at wrote:
And how about
A
I shall enter a but!
Glad to have helped :-)
Walter
Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com schrieb:
Looks like a boundary condition bug. The condition is raised for lengths
of digits+2, but not digits+1.
Rick
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Walter Pachl
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
I can help you with this, give me a little bit of time to put something
together.
Walter,
Here's a simple start of a program. I used the '-' line continuation
character so that lines won't wrap.
I'm sure you will have
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
I can help you with this, give me a little bit of time to put something
together.
Here's a simple start of a program. I used the '-' line
Thanks a million!
Works like a charm.
Two points though:
Rexx version says Version REXX-ooRexx_4.1.1(MT) 6.03 16 May 2012
Should it not say 4.2.0 ??
And
germanWords = .array~of('Vater', 'Matter', 'Gutan','Tag')
should be
germanWords = .array~of('Vater', 'Mutter', 'Guten','Tag')
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Walter Pachl
christel.u.w.pa...@chello.atwrote:
Thanks a million!
** **
Works like a charm.
Two points though:
Rexx version says Version REXX-ooRexx_4.1.1(MT) 6.03 16 May 2012
Should it not say 4.2.0 ??
That is the correct version of
Thanks for clarification of 4.1.1.
Ah one question: why woud it not work on earlier ooRexx version(s)??
now: which is a ,new' feature? (WAS a questionI)
For one, it uses the new C++ native extension mechanism, so it could not
work on any ooRexx before 4.0.0. But, it also uses two API
14 matches
Mail list logo
