Re: [Oorexx-devel] .method behaviour

2008-07-15 Thread Rick McGuire
Sorry, Gmail problems. A lot of code has been rewritten, so it's possible that something unintentional got introduced. Please post a test case showing the problem, but I suspect I know what's happening. There was a problem in prior releases where Method objects were used as class Methods, toplev

Re: [Oorexx-devel] .method behaviour

2008-07-15 Thread Rick McGuire
Well, a lot of stuff has been rewritten, so it's possible that some inadvertent problems have been in On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Moritz Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > did the behaviour of the mthod class change recently? A while ago one > could create instances of this class, su

[Oorexx-devel] .method behaviour

2008-07-15 Thread Moritz Hoffmann
Hi, did the behaviour of the mthod class change recently? A while ago one could create instances of this class, supplying a name and a source array. To actually run the code one needed to invoke run with arguments, prior to this the could would not be executed. This is essential to be able to se

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build tools update

2008-07-15 Thread Moritz Hoffmann
David Ashley wrote: > Moritz - > > After applying your updates to the acinclude.m4 file (which I like BTW) > I am getting a error in the ORX_PTHREAD_MUTEXATTR_SETTYPE_ARG2 function. > I appears that multiple AC_COMPILE_IFELSE macros are not allowed in a > single function definition with my vers

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build tools update

2008-07-15 Thread David Ashley
Moritz - After applying your updates to the acinclude.m4 file (which I like BTW) I am getting a error in the ORX_PTHREAD_MUTEXATTR_SETTYPE_ARG2 function. I appears that multiple AC_COMPILE_IFELSE macros are not allowed in a single function definition with my version of the auto tools (RHEL 5.1).

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ready to make a little change

2008-07-15 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Jon, Your first batch file looks like it does the right thing. The second batch file looks like it does not do the right thing, unless the set output you posted is not correct. Well, I started to answer this, then decided the output from your set command is too garbled. Let's take this offline

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ready to make a little change

2008-07-15 Thread Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers
Hi David, Mark, Thanks for your suggestions. I just have a quick moment before heading off, so I no-opped the make, rid myself of the extraneous 'd:' so the batch file looks like this now: d: > cd \orxSVN\interpreter-3.x\trunk > set SRC_DRV=D: > set SRC_DIR=\orxSVN\interpreter-3.x\trunk\ > set N