Re: [Oorexx-devel] A little question

2009-05-23 Thread Rony G. Flatscher

Rick McGuire wrote:
> Possibly the variable METHODNAME has a value other than the default?
>   

Thank you very much, that was right it!

A sign of being too exhausted.
:(

Anyway, short update on the BSF4Rexx migration to 4.0: the migration to
the new 4.0 APIs is almost finished, the callback mechanism is basically
operational. Still a lot to do and of course, an awful lot to test, but
looking promising so far!

---rony


> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Rony G. Flatscher
>  wrote:
>   
>> Can anyone see why the following statement would not retrieve and show the
>> same value from a stem variable?
>>
>>   say "   bsf.methodName="pp(bsf.METHODNAME)   pp(bsf.["METHODNAME"])
>>
>> The default value for stem is .nil, the output from the above statement is:
>>
>>bsf.methodName=[The NIL object] [windowClosing]
>>
>> The stem object is created in a caller's context from an external routine.
>>
>> Maybe there is a bug somewhere as all other entries in the stem can be
>> retrieved using the usual stem notation, except for this one that has a tail
>> value of "METHODNAME". Maybe I am overlooking something obvious.
>>
>> ---rony
>> 


--
Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT
is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet
the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & 
iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian
Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://www.creativitycat.com 
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel


Re: [Oorexx-devel] A little question

2009-05-23 Thread Rick McGuire
Possibly the variable METHODNAME has a value other than the default?

Rick

On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Rony G. Flatscher
 wrote:
> Can anyone see why the following statement would not retrieve and show the
> same value from a stem variable?
>
>   say "   bsf.methodName="pp(bsf.METHODNAME)   pp(bsf.["METHODNAME"])
>
> The default value for stem is .nil, the output from the above statement is:
>
>    bsf.methodName=[The NIL object] [windowClosing]
>
> The stem object is created in a caller's context from an external routine.
>
> Maybe there is a bug somewhere as all other entries in the stem can be
> retrieved using the usual stem notation, except for this one that has a tail
> value of "METHODNAME". Maybe I am overlooking something obvious.
>
> ---rony
>
>
>
> --
> Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT
> is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals.
> Meet
> the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, &
> iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian
> Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://www.creativitycat.com
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
>

--
Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT
is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet
the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & 
iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian
Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://www.creativitycat.com 
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel


[Oorexx-devel] A little question

2009-05-23 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Can anyone see why the following statement would not retrieve and show
the same value from a stem variable?

  say "   bsf.methodName="pp(bsf.METHODNAME)   pp(bsf.["METHODNAME"])

The default value for stem is .nil, the output from the above statement is:

   bsf.methodName=[The NIL object] [windowClosing]

The stem object is created in a caller's context from an external routine.

Maybe there is a bug somewhere as all other entries in the stem can be
retrieved using the usual stem notation, except for this one that has a
tail value of "METHODNAME". Maybe I am overlooking something obvious.

---rony


--
Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT
is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet
the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & 
iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian
Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://www.creativitycat.com ___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel


Re: [Oorexx-devel] Should I do a refresh build of the beta?

2009-05-23 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Rick McGuire  wrote:

> I believe most of the fixes since the last refresh have been fairly
> trivial problems.  I don't see that there is a need for a refresh at
> this point.

Yeah, that's what I was thinking.

--
Mark Miesfeld

--
Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT
is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet
the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & 
iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian
Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://www.creativitycat.com 
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel


Re: [Oorexx-devel] Should I do a refresh build of the beta?

2009-05-23 Thread Rick McGuire
I believe most of the fixes since the last refresh have been fairly
trivial problems.  I don't see that there is a need for a refresh at
this point.

Rick

On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Mark Miesfeld  wrote:
> As I mentioned previously, I'll be out of touch starting late this
> evening for two weeks.
>
> Should I put a new beta build up on SourceForge?  I have time to do it
> today, but I wonder if there is enough change to warrent it.
>
> --
> Mark Miesfeld
>
> --
> Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT
> is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet
> the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, &
> iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian
> Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://www.creativitycat.com
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>

--
Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT
is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet
the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & 
iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian
Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://www.creativitycat.com 
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel


[Oorexx-devel] Should I do a refresh build of the beta?

2009-05-23 Thread Mark Miesfeld
As I mentioned previously, I'll be out of touch starting late this
evening for two weeks.

Should I put a new beta build up on SourceForge?  I have time to do it
today, but I wonder if there is enough change to warrent it.

--
Mark Miesfeld

--
Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT
is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet
the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & 
iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian
Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://www.creativitycat.com 
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel