The header is not really necessary but probably should be inserted for
completeness and consistency.
David Ashley
On Sat, 2012-08-25 at 16:32 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote:
David,
I'm working on having the build generate the 4 error message files for
you. I notice that the ones in the
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 9:47 AM, David Ashley w.david.ash...@gmail.comwrote:
The header is not really necessary but probably should be inserted for
completeness and consistency.
Already done, after a seriously long xslt wrestling match. New versions
are in trunk.
Rick
David Ashley
On
All -
Well the ooDialog doc is a real bear in a tiger cage (with the tiger
still in the cage). I am only about 1/3 of the way through the files and
I am not sure I will be able to finish it this week. But I am working on
it as fast as I can.
This document has probably 4-5 times the number of
Has anybody been able to create a binary for ooRexx V4.1.2 for Mac OS X 10.5
(Leopard)?
I have not been able to get a reasonable binary to create.
Thanks,
Bruce
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 3:38 PM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anybody been able to create a binary for ooRexx V4.1.2 for Mac OS X 10.5
(Leopard)?
I have not been able to get a reasonable binary to create.
Hi Bruce,
What problems are you having?
4.1.2 is not very different than
In trunk, this .nil comparison fails:
id = 120
do while (id \= .nil)
say id
id += 1
if id 125 then leave
end
say 'out of loop, id:' id
Yields:
out of loop, id: 120
While the strict comparison works:
id = 120
do while (id \== .nil)
say id
id += 1
if id 125
H, I thought I had complete coverage in the test cases...must have
missed one. Ok, I'll take care of it.
Rick
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
In trunk, this .nil comparison fails:
id = 120
do while (id \= .nil)
say id
id += 1
I did have good coverage, but forgot about the Integer and NumberString
classes. This should be fixed now.
Rick
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
H, I thought I had complete coverage in the test cases...must have
missed one. Ok, I'll take care of
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 7:02 AM, David Ashley w.david.ash...@gmail.com wrote:
Well the ooDialog doc is a real bear in a tiger cage (with the tiger
still in the cage). I am only about 1/3 of the way through the files and
I am not sure I will be able to finish it this week. But I am working on
Mark Miesfeld wrote:
Opening up a RFE is the only way to get that enhancement. But,
opening up a RFE is not guaranteed to get it.
I took that as a hint that a prior RFE was not on file.
I had to hunt around for the developer links to the SF site. Finally found a
static link to the RFE
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Michael Lueck
mlu...@lueckdatasystems.com wrote:
I had to hunt around for the developer links to the SF site. Finally found
a static link to the RFE tracker at the ooRexx site. (
http://www.oorexx.org/support/ ) Through the many SF redesigns, most
all of the
Historically, commands that listed files, limited the display for one
reason or another. LISTFILE in CMS showed only one minidisk at a
time, 'ls' in Unix (Multics?) omitted 'dot-files', TSO limited you to
the low-level qualifier or a single PDS. The main reason was to save
console
12 matches
Mail list logo
