Re: [Oorexx-devel] CMake

[P.O. Jonsson]

@Enrico: Can you enlighten us on the purpose of cmake_policy? Should it stay or 
should it go?

@Rick: I found CMake-build-readme.txt where CMake is discussed - are there more 
places?

I guess the WIKI needs some updating as well but I have no  access to that.

Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
P.O. Jonsson
oor...@jonases.se



> Am 07.03.2021 um 18:41 schrieb Rick McGuire :
> 
> I suspect it should. Also note that there are some notes about CMake versions 
> in the build instructions that will also need updating. 
> 
> Rick
> 
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 12:35 PM P.O. Jonsson  > wrote:
> What about this line, should I include it in all places as well?
> 
> cmake_policy(VERSION 2.8...3.3)
> 
> 
> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
> P.O. Jonsson
> oor...@jonases.se 
> 
> 
> 
>> Am 07.03.2021 um 18:24 schrieb P.O. Jonsson > >:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 07.03.2021 um 18:16 schrieb Rick McGuire >> >:
>>> 
>>> I found the old thread from 2018 which discussed the last time we updated 
>>> the required version number. I think leaving the other CMake.txt files as 
>>> 2.6 was just an oversight and they should also have been updated to 2.8 at 
>>> that time. However, I would not be at all opposed to bumping everything to 
>>> 3.12 so that all of the conditional logic for the MAC can be removed. We 
>>> considered at that time jumping to 3.0, but I couldn't find anything in in 
>>> the mail thread that discussed why we settled on 2.0. Surely 3 years later 
>>> a higher version would be acceptable. 
>>> 
>>> Rick
>>> 
>> 
>> That would be even better, I can make a test locally on macOS and some 
>> Linuxes and see if there are any side effects.
>> 
>>> On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 12:06 PM Rick McGuire >> > wrote:
>>> I'm currently running 3.11.4 for my Windows build, I can easily upgrade to 
>>> a new version if needed. The last time I bumped the version level higher, 
>>> there was some objections because of some other platforms. I don't recall 
>>> what the specific objections were. 
>>> 
>>> Rick 
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 11:52 AM P.O. Jonsson >> > wrote:
>>> I think there is a general agreement that requiring 3.12 for macOS is ok 
>>> (Jenkins macOS slave is running 3.13.2).
>>> 
>>> Now I am more interested to hear what the Windows users have to say - is 
>>> there any reason NOT to go from 2.6 to 2.8 as the minimum? I would prefer 
>>> to have the same settings in all CMakelists.txt
>>> 
>>> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
>>> P.O. Jonsson
>>> oor...@jonases.se 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
 Am 07.03.2021 um 16:57 schrieb CV Bruce >>> >:
 
 Whatever. My point was the ready availability of Cmake recent versions for 
 Mac. When I first built ooRexx V5, Rick told me I needed Version 3 of 
 Cmake, which was readily available.
 
 Sent by Magic!
 
> On Mar 7, 2021, at 7:16 AM, Enrico Sorichetti via Oorexx-devel 
>  > wrote:
> 
> IMO the best way to install cmake on APPLE is to use the drag and drop 
> dmg
> Available in the download section at cmake.org 
> 
> You get a first hand build , it allows to keep updated with minimal 
> effort 
> 
> It installs into /Applications and it can create a symlink into /usr/local
> Tested on high sierra , catalina, big sur  
> 
> Now I am using 3.20-rc3
> 
> I built the APPLE  ooRexx universal binaries  and the test suite runs 
> well down to El Capitan
> ( both the x86_64 and the apple silicon  builds) 
> 
> Greetings
> 
> enrico
> 
> 
> 
>> On 7 Mar 2021, at 15:57, CV Bruce > > wrote:
>> 
>> Apple is notorious for updating packages based on their own needs, which 
>> is why I use MacPorts. The current MacPorts version of CMake is 3.19.6. 
>> Fink is 3.19.1, and Homebrew is also 3.19.6.
>> I would be in favor of raising the required Cmake level.
>> 
>> Sent by Magic!
>> 
>>> On Mar 7, 2021, at 5:50 AM, Michael Lueck >> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> Greetings P.O.
>>> 
>>> P.O. Jonsson wrote:
 This will also require 2.8 rather than 2.6 for other platforms, which 
 seems to make sense from the warnings received. Any objections?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Ubuntu Xeniel, which is just rolling off of LTS support shortly has 
>>> version:
>>> 
>>> [ Source: cmake  ]
>>> Package: cmake (3.5.1-1ubuntu1)
>>> 
>>> I see no issue in the Ubuntu world making the minimum version 2.8 
>>> rather than 2.6.
>>> 
>>> I am thankful,
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Michael Lueck
>>> Lueck Data Systems
>>> http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ 

Re: [Oorexx-devel] CMake

[Rick McGuire]

I suspect it should. Also note that there are some notes about CMake
versions in the build instructions that will also need updating.

Rick

On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 12:35 PM P.O. Jonsson  wrote:

> What about this line, should I include it in all places as well?
>
> cmake_policy(VERSION 2.8...3.3)
>
>
> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
> P.O. Jonsson
> oor...@jonases.se
>
>
>
> Am 07.03.2021 um 18:24 schrieb P.O. Jonsson :
>
>
>
> Am 07.03.2021 um 18:16 schrieb Rick McGuire :
>
> I found the old thread from 2018 which discussed the last time we updated
> the required version number. I think leaving the other CMake.txt files as
> 2.6 was just an oversight and they should also have been updated to 2.8 at
> that time. However, I would not be at all opposed to bumping everything to
> 3.12 so that all of the conditional logic for the MAC can be removed. We
> considered at that time jumping to 3.0, but I couldn't find anything in in
> the mail thread that discussed why we settled on 2.0. Surely 3 years later
> a higher version would be acceptable.
>
> Rick
>
>
> That would be even better, I can make a test locally on macOS and some
> Linuxes and see if there are any side effects.
>
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 12:06 PM Rick McGuire 
> wrote:
>
>> I'm currently running 3.11.4 for my Windows build, I can easily upgrade
>> to a new version if needed. The last time I bumped the version level
>> higher, there was some objections because of some other platforms. I don't
>> recall what the specific objections were.
>>
>> Rick
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 11:52 AM P.O. Jonsson  wrote:
>>
>>> I think there is a general agreement that requiring 3.12 for macOS is ok
>>> (Jenkins macOS slave is running 3.13.2).
>>>
>>> Now I am more interested to hear what the Windows users have to say - is
>>> there any reason NOT to go from 2.6 to 2.8 as the minimum? I would prefer
>>> to have the same settings in all CMakelists.txt
>>>
>>> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
>>> P.O. Jonsson
>>> oor...@jonases.se
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 07.03.2021 um 16:57 schrieb CV Bruce :
>>>
>>> Whatever. My point was the ready availability of Cmake recent versions
>>> for Mac. When I first built ooRexx V5, Rick told me I needed Version 3 of
>>> Cmake, which was readily available.
>>>
>>> Sent by Magic!
>>>
>>> On Mar 7, 2021, at 7:16 AM, Enrico Sorichetti via Oorexx-devel <
>>> oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> IMO the best way to install cmake on APPLE is to use the drag and drop
>>> dmg
>>> Available in the download section at cmake.org
>>>
>>> You get a first hand build , it allows to keep updated with minimal
>>> effort
>>>
>>> It installs into /Applications and it can create a symlink into
>>> /usr/local
>>> Tested on high sierra , catalina, big sur
>>>
>>> Now I am using 3.20-rc3
>>>
>>> I built the APPLE  ooRexx universal binaries  and the test suite runs
>>> well down to El Capitan
>>> ( both the x86_64 and the apple silicon  builds)
>>>
>>> Greetings
>>>
>>> enrico
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7 Mar 2021, at 15:57, CV Bruce  wrote:
>>>
>>> Apple is notorious for updating packages based on their own needs, which
>>> is why I use MacPorts. The current MacPorts version of CMake is 3.19.6.
>>> Fink is 3.19.1, and Homebrew is also 3.19.6.
>>> I would be in favor of raising the required Cmake level.
>>>
>>> Sent by Magic!
>>>
>>> On Mar 7, 2021, at 5:50 AM, Michael Lueck 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Greetings P.O.
>>>
>>> P.O. Jonsson wrote:
>>>
>>> This will also require 2.8 rather than 2.6 for other platforms, which
>>> seems to make sense from the warnings received. Any objections?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ubuntu Xeniel, which is just rolling off of LTS support shortly has
>>> version:
>>>
>>> [ Source: cmake  ]
>>> Package: cmake (3.5.1-1ubuntu1)
>>>
>>> I see no issue in the Ubuntu world making the minimum version 2.8 rather
>>> than 2.6.
>>>
>>> I am thankful,
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael Lueck
>>> Lueck Data Systems
>>> http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>>
>> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> 

Re: [Oorexx-devel] CMake

[P.O. Jonsson]

What about this line, should I include it in all places as well?

cmake_policy(VERSION 2.8...3.3)


Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
P.O. Jonsson
oor...@jonases.se



> Am 07.03.2021 um 18:24 schrieb P.O. Jonsson :
> 
> 
> 
>> Am 07.03.2021 um 18:16 schrieb Rick McGuire > >:
>> 
>> I found the old thread from 2018 which discussed the last time we updated 
>> the required version number. I think leaving the other CMake.txt files as 
>> 2.6 was just an oversight and they should also have been updated to 2.8 at 
>> that time. However, I would not be at all opposed to bumping everything to 
>> 3.12 so that all of the conditional logic for the MAC can be removed. We 
>> considered at that time jumping to 3.0, but I couldn't find anything in in 
>> the mail thread that discussed why we settled on 2.0. Surely 3 years later a 
>> higher version would be acceptable. 
>> 
>> Rick
>> 
> 
> That would be even better, I can make a test locally on macOS and some 
> Linuxes and see if there are any side effects.
> 
>> On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 12:06 PM Rick McGuire > > wrote:
>> I'm currently running 3.11.4 for my Windows build, I can easily upgrade to a 
>> new version if needed. The last time I bumped the version level higher, 
>> there was some objections because of some other platforms. I don't recall 
>> what the specific objections were. 
>> 
>> Rick 
>> 
>> On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 11:52 AM P.O. Jonsson > > wrote:
>> I think there is a general agreement that requiring 3.12 for macOS is ok 
>> (Jenkins macOS slave is running 3.13.2).
>> 
>> Now I am more interested to hear what the Windows users have to say - is 
>> there any reason NOT to go from 2.6 to 2.8 as the minimum? I would prefer to 
>> have the same settings in all CMakelists.txt
>> 
>> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
>> P.O. Jonsson
>> oor...@jonases.se 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 07.03.2021 um 16:57 schrieb CV Bruce >> >:
>>> 
>>> Whatever. My point was the ready availability of Cmake recent versions for 
>>> Mac. When I first built ooRexx V5, Rick told me I needed Version 3 of 
>>> Cmake, which was readily available.
>>> 
>>> Sent by Magic!
>>> 
 On Mar 7, 2021, at 7:16 AM, Enrico Sorichetti via Oorexx-devel 
 >>> > wrote:
 
 IMO the best way to install cmake on APPLE is to use the drag and drop dmg
 Available in the download section at cmake.org 
 
 You get a first hand build , it allows to keep updated with minimal effort 
 
 It installs into /Applications and it can create a symlink into /usr/local
 Tested on high sierra , catalina, big sur  
 
 Now I am using 3.20-rc3
 
 I built the APPLE  ooRexx universal binaries  and the test suite runs well 
 down to El Capitan
 ( both the x86_64 and the apple silicon  builds) 
 
 Greetings
 
 enrico
 
 
 
> On 7 Mar 2021, at 15:57, CV Bruce  > wrote:
> 
> Apple is notorious for updating packages based on their own needs, which 
> is why I use MacPorts. The current MacPorts version of CMake is 3.19.6. 
> Fink is 3.19.1, and Homebrew is also 3.19.6.
> I would be in favor of raising the required Cmake level.
> 
> Sent by Magic!
> 
>> On Mar 7, 2021, at 5:50 AM, Michael Lueck > > wrote:
>> 
>> Greetings P.O.
>> 
>> P.O. Jonsson wrote:
>>> This will also require 2.8 rather than 2.6 for other platforms, which 
>>> seems to make sense from the warnings received. Any objections?
>> 
>> 
>> Ubuntu Xeniel, which is just rolling off of LTS support shortly has 
>> version:
>> 
>> [ Source: cmake  ]
>> Package: cmake (3.5.1-1ubuntu1)
>> 
>> I see no issue in the Ubuntu world making the minimum version 2.8 rather 
>> than 2.6.
>> 
>> I am thankful,
>> 
>> -- 
>> Michael Lueck
>> Lueck Data Systems
>> http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
>> 
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel 
>> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
> 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel 
> 
 
 ___
 Oorexx-devel mailing list
 Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
 

Re: [Oorexx-devel] CMake

[P.O. Jonsson]

> Am 07.03.2021 um 18:16 schrieb Rick McGuire :
> 
> I found the old thread from 2018 which discussed the last time we updated the 
> required version number. I think leaving the other CMake.txt files as 2.6 was 
> just an oversight and they should also have been updated to 2.8 at that time. 
> However, I would not be at all opposed to bumping everything to 3.12 so that 
> all of the conditional logic for the MAC can be removed. We considered at 
> that time jumping to 3.0, but I couldn't find anything in in the mail thread 
> that discussed why we settled on 2.0. Surely 3 years later a higher version 
> would be acceptable. 
> 
> Rick
> 

That would be even better, I can make a test locally on macOS and some Linuxes 
and see if there are any side effects.

> On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 12:06 PM Rick McGuire  > wrote:
> I'm currently running 3.11.4 for my Windows build, I can easily upgrade to a 
> new version if needed. The last time I bumped the version level higher, there 
> was some objections because of some other platforms. I don't recall what the 
> specific objections were. 
> 
> Rick 
> 
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 11:52 AM P.O. Jonsson  > wrote:
> I think there is a general agreement that requiring 3.12 for macOS is ok 
> (Jenkins macOS slave is running 3.13.2).
> 
> Now I am more interested to hear what the Windows users have to say - is 
> there any reason NOT to go from 2.6 to 2.8 as the minimum? I would prefer to 
> have the same settings in all CMakelists.txt
> 
> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
> P.O. Jonsson
> oor...@jonases.se 
> 
> 
> 
>> Am 07.03.2021 um 16:57 schrieb CV Bruce > >:
>> 
>> Whatever. My point was the ready availability of Cmake recent versions for 
>> Mac. When I first built ooRexx V5, Rick told me I needed Version 3 of Cmake, 
>> which was readily available.
>> 
>> Sent by Magic!
>> 
>>> On Mar 7, 2021, at 7:16 AM, Enrico Sorichetti via Oorexx-devel 
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> IMO the best way to install cmake on APPLE is to use the drag and drop dmg
>>> Available in the download section at cmake.org 
>>> 
>>> You get a first hand build , it allows to keep updated with minimal effort 
>>> 
>>> It installs into /Applications and it can create a symlink into /usr/local
>>> Tested on high sierra , catalina, big sur  
>>> 
>>> Now I am using 3.20-rc3
>>> 
>>> I built the APPLE  ooRexx universal binaries  and the test suite runs well 
>>> down to El Capitan
>>> ( both the x86_64 and the apple silicon  builds) 
>>> 
>>> Greetings
>>> 
>>> enrico
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
 On 7 Mar 2021, at 15:57, CV Bruce >>> > wrote:
 
 Apple is notorious for updating packages based on their own needs, which 
 is why I use MacPorts. The current MacPorts version of CMake is 3.19.6. 
 Fink is 3.19.1, and Homebrew is also 3.19.6.
 I would be in favor of raising the required Cmake level.
 
 Sent by Magic!
 
> On Mar 7, 2021, at 5:50 AM, Michael Lueck  > wrote:
> 
> Greetings P.O.
> 
> P.O. Jonsson wrote:
>> This will also require 2.8 rather than 2.6 for other platforms, which 
>> seems to make sense from the warnings received. Any objections?
> 
> 
> Ubuntu Xeniel, which is just rolling off of LTS support shortly has 
> version:
> 
> [ Source: cmake  ]
> Package: cmake (3.5.1-1ubuntu1)
> 
> I see no issue in the Ubuntu world making the minimum version 2.8 rather 
> than 2.6.
> 
> I am thankful,
> 
> -- 
> Michael Lueck
> Lueck Data Systems
> http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ 
> 
> 
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
> 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel 
> 
 
 
 ___
 Oorexx-devel mailing list
 Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
 
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel 
 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
>>> 
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel 
>>> 
>> ___
>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
>> 
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel 
>> 

Re: [Oorexx-devel] CMake

[Rick McGuire]

I found the old thread from 2018 which discussed the last time we updated
the required version number. I think leaving the other CMake.txt files as
2.6 was just an oversight and they should also have been updated to 2.8 at
that time. However, I would not be at all opposed to bumping everything to
3.12 so that all of the conditional logic for the MAC can be removed. We
considered at that time jumping to 3.0, but I couldn't find anything in in
the mail thread that discussed why we settled on 2.0. Surely 3 years later
a higher version would be acceptable.

Rick

On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 12:06 PM Rick McGuire  wrote:

> I'm currently running 3.11.4 for my Windows build, I can easily upgrade to
> a new version if needed. The last time I bumped the version level higher,
> there was some objections because of some other platforms. I don't recall
> what the specific objections were.
>
> Rick
>
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 11:52 AM P.O. Jonsson  wrote:
>
>> I think there is a general agreement that requiring 3.12 for macOS is ok
>> (Jenkins macOS slave is running 3.13.2).
>>
>> Now I am more interested to hear what the Windows users have to say - is
>> there any reason NOT to go from 2.6 to 2.8 as the minimum? I would prefer
>> to have the same settings in all CMakelists.txt
>>
>> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
>> P.O. Jonsson
>> oor...@jonases.se
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 07.03.2021 um 16:57 schrieb CV Bruce :
>>
>> Whatever. My point was the ready availability of Cmake recent versions
>> for Mac. When I first built ooRexx V5, Rick told me I needed Version 3 of
>> Cmake, which was readily available.
>>
>> Sent by Magic!
>>
>> On Mar 7, 2021, at 7:16 AM, Enrico Sorichetti via Oorexx-devel <
>> oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>>
>> IMO the best way to install cmake on APPLE is to use the drag and drop
>> dmg
>> Available in the download section at cmake.org
>>
>> You get a first hand build , it allows to keep updated with minimal
>> effort
>>
>> It installs into /Applications and it can create a symlink into /usr/local
>> Tested on high sierra , catalina, big sur
>>
>> Now I am using 3.20-rc3
>>
>> I built the APPLE  ooRexx universal binaries  and the test suite runs
>> well down to El Capitan
>> ( both the x86_64 and the apple silicon  builds)
>>
>> Greetings
>>
>> enrico
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7 Mar 2021, at 15:57, CV Bruce  wrote:
>>
>> Apple is notorious for updating packages based on their own needs, which
>> is why I use MacPorts. The current MacPorts version of CMake is 3.19.6.
>> Fink is 3.19.1, and Homebrew is also 3.19.6.
>> I would be in favor of raising the required Cmake level.
>>
>> Sent by Magic!
>>
>> On Mar 7, 2021, at 5:50 AM, Michael Lueck 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Greetings P.O.
>>
>> P.O. Jonsson wrote:
>>
>> This will also require 2.8 rather than 2.6 for other platforms, which
>> seems to make sense from the warnings received. Any objections?
>>
>>
>>
>> Ubuntu Xeniel, which is just rolling off of LTS support shortly has
>> version:
>>
>> [ Source: cmake  ]
>> Package: cmake (3.5.1-1ubuntu1)
>>
>> I see no issue in the Ubuntu world making the minimum version 2.8 rather
>> than 2.6.
>>
>> I am thankful,
>>
>> --
>> Michael Lueck
>> Lueck Data Systems
>> http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>
>> ___
>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>
>
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] CMake

[Rick McGuire]

I'm currently running 3.11.4 for my Windows build, I can easily upgrade to
a new version if needed. The last time I bumped the version level higher,
there was some objections because of some other platforms. I don't recall
what the specific objections were.

Rick

On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 11:52 AM P.O. Jonsson  wrote:

> I think there is a general agreement that requiring 3.12 for macOS is ok
> (Jenkins macOS slave is running 3.13.2).
>
> Now I am more interested to hear what the Windows users have to say - is
> there any reason NOT to go from 2.6 to 2.8 as the minimum? I would prefer
> to have the same settings in all CMakelists.txt
>
> Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
> P.O. Jonsson
> oor...@jonases.se
>
>
>
> Am 07.03.2021 um 16:57 schrieb CV Bruce :
>
> Whatever. My point was the ready availability of Cmake recent versions for
> Mac. When I first built ooRexx V5, Rick told me I needed Version 3 of
> Cmake, which was readily available.
>
> Sent by Magic!
>
> On Mar 7, 2021, at 7:16 AM, Enrico Sorichetti via Oorexx-devel <
> oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> IMO the best way to install cmake on APPLE is to use the drag and drop dmg
> Available in the download section at cmake.org
>
> You get a first hand build , it allows to keep updated with minimal effort
>
> It installs into /Applications and it can create a symlink into /usr/local
> Tested on high sierra , catalina, big sur
>
> Now I am using 3.20-rc3
>
> I built the APPLE  ooRexx universal binaries  and the test suite runs well
> down to El Capitan
> ( both the x86_64 and the apple silicon  builds)
>
> Greetings
>
> enrico
>
>
>
> On 7 Mar 2021, at 15:57, CV Bruce  wrote:
>
> Apple is notorious for updating packages based on their own needs, which
> is why I use MacPorts. The current MacPorts version of CMake is 3.19.6.
> Fink is 3.19.1, and Homebrew is also 3.19.6.
> I would be in favor of raising the required Cmake level.
>
> Sent by Magic!
>
> On Mar 7, 2021, at 5:50 AM, Michael Lueck 
> wrote:
>
> Greetings P.O.
>
> P.O. Jonsson wrote:
>
> This will also require 2.8 rather than 2.6 for other platforms, which
> seems to make sense from the warnings received. Any objections?
>
>
>
> Ubuntu Xeniel, which is just rolling off of LTS support shortly has
> version:
>
> [ Source: cmake  ]
> Package: cmake (3.5.1-1ubuntu1)
>
> I see no issue in the Ubuntu world making the minimum version 2.8 rather
> than 2.6.
>
> I am thankful,
>
> --
> Michael Lueck
> Lueck Data Systems
> http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
>
>
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
>
>
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
>
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
>
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] CMake

[P.O. Jonsson]

I think there is a general agreement that requiring 3.12 for macOS is ok 
(Jenkins macOS slave is running 3.13.2).

Now I am more interested to hear what the Windows users have to say - is there 
any reason NOT to go from 2.6 to 2.8 as the minimum? I would prefer to have the 
same settings in all CMakelists.txt

Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
P.O. Jonsson
oor...@jonases.se



> Am 07.03.2021 um 16:57 schrieb CV Bruce :
> 
> Whatever. My point was the ready availability of Cmake recent versions for 
> Mac. When I first built ooRexx V5, Rick told me I needed Version 3 of Cmake, 
> which was readily available.
> 
> Sent by Magic!
> 
>> On Mar 7, 2021, at 7:16 AM, Enrico Sorichetti via Oorexx-devel 
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> IMO the best way to install cmake on APPLE is to use the drag and drop dmg
>> Available in the download section at cmake.org 
>> 
>> You get a first hand build , it allows to keep updated with minimal effort 
>> 
>> It installs into /Applications and it can create a symlink into /usr/local
>> Tested on high sierra , catalina, big sur  
>> 
>> Now I am using 3.20-rc3
>> 
>> I built the APPLE  ooRexx universal binaries  and the test suite runs well 
>> down to El Capitan
>> ( both the x86_64 and the apple silicon  builds) 
>> 
>> Greetings
>> 
>> enrico
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 7 Mar 2021, at 15:57, CV Bruce >> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> Apple is notorious for updating packages based on their own needs, which is 
>>> why I use MacPorts. The current MacPorts version of CMake is 3.19.6. Fink 
>>> is 3.19.1, and Homebrew is also 3.19.6.
>>> I would be in favor of raising the required Cmake level.
>>> 
>>> Sent by Magic!
>>> 
 On Mar 7, 2021, at 5:50 AM, Michael Lueck >>> > wrote:
 
 Greetings P.O.
 
 P.O. Jonsson wrote:
> This will also require 2.8 rather than 2.6 for other platforms, which 
> seems to make sense from the warnings received. Any objections?
 
 
 Ubuntu Xeniel, which is just rolling off of LTS support shortly has 
 version:
 
 [ Source: cmake  ]
 Package: cmake (3.5.1-1ubuntu1)
 
 I see no issue in the Ubuntu world making the minimum version 2.8 rather 
 than 2.6.
 
 I am thankful,
 
 -- 
 Michael Lueck
 Lueck Data Systems
 http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ 
 
 
 ___
 Oorexx-devel mailing list
 Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
>>> 
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>> 
>> ___
>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] CMake

[CV Bruce]

Whatever. My point was the ready availability of Cmake recent versions for Mac. 
When I first built ooRexx V5, Rick told me I needed Version 3 of Cmake, which 
was readily available.

Sent by Magic!

> On Mar 7, 2021, at 7:16 AM, Enrico Sorichetti via Oorexx-devel 
>  wrote:
> 
> IMO the best way to install cmake on APPLE is to use the drag and drop dmg
> Available in the download section at cmake.org
> 
> You get a first hand build , it allows to keep updated with minimal effort 
> 
> It installs into /Applications and it can create a symlink into /usr/local
> Tested on high sierra , catalina, big sur  
> 
> Now I am using 3.20-rc3
> 
> I built the APPLE  ooRexx universal binaries  and the test suite runs well 
> down to El Capitan
> ( both the x86_64 and the apple silicon  builds) 
> 
> Greetings
> 
> enrico
> 
> 
> 
>> On 7 Mar 2021, at 15:57, CV Bruce  wrote:
>> 
>> Apple is notorious for updating packages based on their own needs, which is 
>> why I use MacPorts. The current MacPorts version of CMake is 3.19.6. Fink is 
>> 3.19.1, and Homebrew is also 3.19.6.
>> I would be in favor of raising the required Cmake level.
>> 
>> Sent by Magic!
>> 
 On Mar 7, 2021, at 5:50 AM, Michael Lueck  
 wrote:
 
 Greetings P.O.
 
 P.O. Jonsson wrote:
 This will also require 2.8 rather than 2.6 for other platforms, which 
 seems to make sense from the warnings received. Any objections?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Ubuntu Xeniel, which is just rolling off of LTS support shortly has version:
>>> 
>>> [ Source: cmake  ]
>>> Package: cmake (3.5.1-1ubuntu1)
>>> 
>>> I see no issue in the Ubuntu world making the minimum version 2.8 rather 
>>> than 2.6.
>>> 
>>> I am thankful,
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Michael Lueck
>>> Lueck Data Systems
>>> http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
> 
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] CMake

[Enrico Sorichetti via Oorexx-devel]

IMO the best way to install cmake on APPLE is to use the drag and drop dmg
Available in the download section at cmake.org 

You get a first hand build , it allows to keep updated with minimal effort 

It installs into /Applications and it can create a symlink into /usr/local
Tested on high sierra , catalina, big sur  

Now I am using 3.20-rc3

I built the APPLE  ooRexx universal binaries  and the test suite runs well down 
to El Capitan
( both the x86_64 and the apple silicon  builds) 

Greetings

enrico



> On 7 Mar 2021, at 15:57, CV Bruce  wrote:
> 
> Apple is notorious for updating packages based on their own needs, which is 
> why I use MacPorts. The current MacPorts version of CMake is 3.19.6. Fink is 
> 3.19.1, and Homebrew is also 3.19.6.
> I would be in favor of raising the required Cmake level.
> 
> Sent by Magic!
> 
>> On Mar 7, 2021, at 5:50 AM, Michael Lueck  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Greetings P.O.
>> 
>> P.O. Jonsson wrote:
>>> This will also require 2.8 rather than 2.6 for other platforms, which seems 
>>> to make sense from the warnings received. Any objections?
>> 
>> 
>> Ubuntu Xeniel, which is just rolling off of LTS support shortly has version:
>> 
>> [ Source: cmake  ]
>> Package: cmake (3.5.1-1ubuntu1)
>> 
>> I see no issue in the Ubuntu world making the minimum version 2.8 rather 
>> than 2.6.
>> 
>> I am thankful,
>> 
>> -- 
>> Michael Lueck
>> Lueck Data Systems
>> http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
> 
> 
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] CMake

[CV Bruce]

Apple is notorious for updating packages based on their own needs, which is why 
I use MacPorts. The current MacPorts version of CMake is 3.19.6. Fink is 
3.19.1, and Homebrew is also 3.19.6.
I would be in favor of raising the required Cmake level.

Sent by Magic!

> On Mar 7, 2021, at 5:50 AM, Michael Lueck  wrote:
> 
> Greetings P.O.
> 
> P.O. Jonsson wrote:
>> This will also require 2.8 rather than 2.6 for other platforms, which seems 
>> to make sense from the warnings received. Any objections?
> 
> 
> Ubuntu Xeniel, which is just rolling off of LTS support shortly has version:
> 
> [ Source: cmake  ]
> Package: cmake (3.5.1-1ubuntu1)
> 
> I see no issue in the Ubuntu world making the minimum version 2.8 rather than 
> 2.6.
> 
> I am thankful,
> 
> -- 
> Michael Lueck
> Lueck Data Systems
> http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
> 
> 
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel


___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

[Oorexx-devel] CMake

[P.O. Jonsson]

On macOS there are a large number of warnings lately that the CMake version 
required is to low:

CMake Deprecation Warning at samples/native.api/CMakeLists.txt:41 
(cmake_minimum_required):
  Compatibility with CMake < 2.8.12 will be removed from a future version of
  CMake.

  Update the VERSION argument  value or use a ... suffix to tell
  CMake that the project does not need compatibility with older versions.

It seems to be the same warning that we had for the main CMakelists.txt (that 
was fixed by Enrico I think). It is now spreading to all CMakelists.txt files 
further down the path.

If there are no objections I want to include the fix we already have for all 
CMakelists.txt, in other words replace this:

cmake_minimum_required (VERSION 2.6)

With this:

message(STATUS "CMake version is ${CMAKE_VERSION}")
if (APPLE)
# apple build with lower cmake version have an @rpath problem
cmake_minimum_required (VERSION 3.12)
else()
#for other platforms
cmake_minimum_required (VERSION 2.8)
endif()
cmake_policy(VERSION 2.8...3.3)

This will also require 2.8 rather than 2.6 for other platforms, which seems to 
make sense from the warnings received. Any objections?

Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
P.O. Jonsson
oor...@jonases.se



___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel