Franz wrote:
I think I do not use the correct editor with KATE for my .ini file, it is too
silly for me.
I attach to you my last 2 test-files.
I think you can tell me what I have to do.
Your MyRexxComp.ini file was last edited and saved using UTF-8 codepage
encoding. This is shown as
). The author finally
makes this admission directly in their conclusion.
Mark L. Gaubatz
From: Jean Louis Faucher
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2023 07:37
To: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List
Subject: [Oorexx-devel] "Per-Interpreter GIL" will land in Python 3.12
I saw
+1 from here as well as from my clients.
Mark
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Rony:
Since the original version of ooRexx, without a declaration of how to view the
multi-dimensional objects sparsely, results are generically indeterminate as
mapping is based on the highest indices used. Thus, either an .array~new(6,7)
specification is required, or the first element
syntactically correct, does not optimize on
several compilers for performance. The fastest all around is ((len & 1u)).
Mark
From: Mark L. Gaubatz via Oorexx-devel
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2019 11:05 AM
To: 'Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List'
Cc: Mark L. Gaubatz
Subject
Rony:
Too many comparisons are being done from a performance perspective; a minimal
comparison for validation and no comparison for translation is the fastest.
Actual translation should be done with a pair of 256-byte arrays for speed AND
portability across character sets. Speed varies
Given the many projects for which I am using CMake, I would strongly recommend
3.5 or higher as the minimum base. VS 2017 includes integration support for
3.7.2 and higher. 3.8 introduces language level standards.
Mark
From: Rick McGuire
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 6:28 AM
To: Open
No showstoppers in my code base or in the code bases of my clients... I
concur with a freeze and release.
Mark
On 03/22/2018 04:34 PM, rvjansen@... wrote:
Hi ooRexx developers,
As we have the symposium next week the question pops up (like it did last
year), if ooRexx 5.0 is ready to be
The article is highly misleading. If I am reading the sources properly,
MS is completing the deprecation of the MS-DOS command line environment
in favor of PowerShell. The CW article absolutely did the environment a
disservice in their presentation.
Mark
On 12/07/2016 11:32 AM, Michael Lueck
The article is highly misleading. If I am reading the sources properly,
MS is completing the deprecation of the MS-DOS command line environment
in favor of PowerShell. The CW article absolutely did the environment a
disservice in their presentation.
Mark
On 12/07/2016 11:32 AM, Michael Lueck
. Gaubatz wrote:
On Jul 26, 2016, at 1:21 PM, René Jansen <rvjan...@xs4all.nl> wrote
Are there other package install experiences?
Quoting from my prior posted email...
On 07/21/2016 12:19 PM, Mark L. Gaubatz wrote:
Also, at least with the .deb distribution files, a /home/Jenkins
On Jul 26, 2016, at 1:21 PM, René Jansen <rvjan...@xs4all.nl> wrote
Are there other package install experiences?
Quoting from my prior posted email...
On 07/21/2016 12:19 PM, Mark L. Gaubatz wrote:
Also, at least with the .deb distribution files, a /home/Jenkins folder
is
On Jul 26, 2016, at 1:21 PM, René Jansen <rvjan...@xs4all.nl> wrote
Are there other package install experiences?
Quoting from my prior posted email...
On 07/21/2016 12:19 PM, Mark L. Gaubatz wrote:
Also, at least with the .deb distribution files, a /home/Jenkins folder
is
Also, at least with the .deb distribution files, a /home/Jenkins folder
is being created with leftover and/or incomplete build artifacts from
the sample files (or the samples did not complete their proper
installation).
On 07/20/2016 12:11 PM, Terry Fuller wrote:
>
> Can someone check on the
standards, if any, do I need to adhere/conform to, should the
routines be accepted for inclusion?
2) Any additional feedback or input?
Mark L. Gaubatz
--
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
15 matches
Mail list logo
