Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
I closed that bug because the original submitter of the bug refused to
provide a test case that demonstrated the bug. So, I had to build my own
test case, and my test case worked fine.
There was nothing in the original report that suggested a problem
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge
jn.ml.sfrg...@letterboxes.org wrote:
Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
I closed that bug because the original submitter of the bug refused to
provide a test case that demonstrated the bug. So, I had to build my own
test
Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge
jn.ml.sfrg...@letterboxes.org wrote:
There was nothing in the original report that suggested a problem with a
MIME message, though.
But he did. He said: Try changing the message text in
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge
jn.ml.sfrg...@letterboxes.org wrote:
Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
Right. You brought it up here again. I explained why I closed it. You
brought up several things you think are bugs. I said you should open up
bugs
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
... Bringing things up on the developer list is a much better way
to elicit comments than trying to put long discussions in a bug
report. There is probably only a few of us that read every bug
report.
I should have
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
... Bringing things up on the developer list is a much better way
to elicit comments than trying to put long discussions in a bug
report.
Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm in total agreement with Jerry on this one. This is an area I have a
little bit of expertise, having written the Apache javamail
implementation.
Okay, I'll go back and look
Jeremy,
I closed that bug because the original submitter of the bug refused to
provide a test case that demonstrated the bug. So, I had to build my
own test case, and my test case worked fine.
I appreciate the work you do on bugs. I would like all bugs in ooRexx
to be fixed. I know if you
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
So, please open up a new bug. ;-)
Jeremy,
I should have said open up a bug for each issue you think is a bug.
Opening up one bug for several different bugs just makes it harder to
work with the bug and less likely it
Well: this is a test line.
I wonder if this message will get sent? I certainly expect it to. In this
bug report Mark recently said:
More simply put, because of the definition of header fields, an email
message body can not begin with a word ending in a colon because a line
beginning
I'm in total agreement with Jerry on this one. This is an area I have a
little bit of expertise, having written the Apache javamail implementation.
Rick
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge
jn.ml.sfrg...@letterboxes.org wrote:
Well: this is a test line.
I
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm in total agreement with Jerry on this one. This is an area I have a
little bit of expertise, having written the Apache javamail implementation.
Okay, I'll go back and look at that more closely.
My reading of the
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge
jn.ml.sfrg...@letterboxes.org wrote:
...
However it's quite unclear to me from the original report whether the
message the user was trying to send consisted of a bunch of headers, then a
blank line, then the error message, or
13 matches
Mail list logo
