[Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.0 on Linux / SVN:3595

2008-10-23 Thread Rainer Tammer
Hello, the 3595 hangs during build on Linux SLES9... ... Wl,-soname -Wl,librexxutil.so.4 -o .libs/librexxutil.so.4.0.0 (cd .libs rm -f librexxutil.so.4 ln -s librexxutil.so.4.0.0 librexxutil.so.4) (cd .libs rm -f librexxutil.so ln -s librexxutil.so.4.0.0 librexxutil.so) ar cru

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.0 on Linux / SVN:3595

2008-10-23 Thread Moritz Hoffmann
Rainer Tammer wrote: Hello, the 3595 hangs during build on Linux SLES9... 3597 compiles cleanly again, and builds the image correctly. So either it got fixed or the problem is SLES9 specific. Moritz -- Moritz Hoffmann http://antiguru.de/

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.0 on Linux

2008-07-14 Thread Moritz Hoffmann
Hi, oorexx 4 works for me as well, I can compile and run it by now - on my Dedian machine. Thanks for the effort. However, rexx sometimes fails to load the rexx image. Here is a stack trace. #0 RexxMemory::restoreImage (this=0xb7f20120) at ./kernel/runtime/RexxBehaviour.hpp:100 #1

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.0 on Linux

2008-07-14 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Moritz, Are you doing a build in between these different sizes? There was a problem on Windows with the build order where sometimes some things got left out. -- Mark Miesfeld On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Moritz Hoffmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, oorexx 4 works for me as well, I can

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.0 on Linux

2008-07-11 Thread René Jansen
Rexx Developer Mailing List oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net cc Subject Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.0 on Linux I tried that, and it didn't work. I also modified the code in loadImage() to just try opening rexx.img first to try to grab it from the current directory. That didn't work either

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.0 on Linux

2008-07-11 Thread Rick McGuire
/11/2008 09:10 AM Please respond to Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net cc Subject Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.0 on Linux I tried that, and it didn't work. I also

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.0 on Linux

2008-07-11 Thread Rick McGuire
Rene, Could you do an svn info from your trunk directory and post the result? Rick On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 1:18 PM, René Jansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark, yes. but this is actually the only project in which svn appears to be doing this, and I would like to trust the versioning tools. I

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.0 on Linux

2008-07-11 Thread Rick McGuire
Yeah, it's a long story. I took that branch about 3 1/2 years ago, and was madly toiling away at the codethen I moved above 3 years ago and work stalled. In the meantime, I finally decided that we need to get some new features out, so all of the new stuff in 3.2.0 caused the two branches to

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.0 on Linux

2008-07-11 Thread René Jansen
Rick, thanks, I vote for removing the stalled branch. In the meantime, I got as fas as: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -DORX_VER=4 -DORX_REL=0 -DORX_MOD=0 - DORX_FIX=0 -DORX_SYS_STR=\MACOSX\ -DORX_CATDIR=\/opt/ooRexx/bin\ - DORX_SHARED_LIBRARY_EXT=\.dylib\ -I./lib -I./api -I./api/platform/ unix

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.0 on Linux

2008-07-11 Thread David Ashley
cc 07/11/2008 12:31 Subject PMRe: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.0 on Linux

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.0 on Linux

2008-07-11 Thread Rick McGuire
Oh crudI thought that function was more standard across the unixes. Rick On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 1:41 PM, René Jansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rick, thanks, I vote for removing the stalled branch. In the meantime, I got as fas as: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -DORX_VER=4 -DORX_REL=0

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.0 on Linux

2008-07-11 Thread Rick McGuire
I'd prefer not to remove it yet, as I'm not done mining that code for useful nuggets A renaming certainly could be in order though. I also forgot to mention that at the time I started that exercise, the 3.x code was still in the CVS repository and the 4.x code was in SVN, partly because I didn't

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.0 on Linux

2008-07-11 Thread René Jansen
Rick, got a bit further into the build ./kernel/platform/unix/SysFile.cpp: In member function 'bool SysFile::read(char*, size_t, size_t)': ./kernel/platform/unix/SysFile.cpp:287: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type but that is only a warning, but this is the

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.0 on Linux

2008-07-11 Thread René Jansen
and still a bit further, now stalling at ./kernel/runtime/LibraryPackage.cpp: In member function 'void LibraryPackage::loadRoutines(RexxRoutineEntry*)': ./kernel/runtime/LibraryPackage.cpp:267: error: invalid conversion from 'unsigned int (*)(const char*, size_t, CONSTRXSTRING*, const

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.0 on Linux

2008-07-10 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Since David was so cool to get the rpm build working, I thought I'd give it a quick try. After a RPM install, on a very simple program, just: say hello world It runs but no output is produced. Is that a symptom of not finding the image? -- Mark Miesfeld On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Rick

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.0 on Linux

2008-07-10 Thread Rick McGuire
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Mark Miesfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, it does. It looks like it finds the image for me. Both when I run the RPM installed version and when I run from the build directory. My user land debugging skills on Linux are poor. grin But still better than

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.0 on Linux

2008-07-10 Thread Rick McGuire
Ah...the rexx in the build directory is just a shell script. That actual executable file is in the .libs directory. However, when I try to invoke that directly, I get the image error. And I've yet to find the combination of factors to allow that to load. Rick On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 6:39 PM,