Re: [Oorexx-devel] Any ideas how to fix bug 1645 ?

2019-08-14 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Dear Enrico, super, thank you very much for your example and the output of running it!! On 14.08.2019 07:46, Enrico Sorichetti via Oorexx-devel wrote: > IMO the logic to determine the installation directory structure is broken > > > Create a test directory with the following CMakeLists.txt

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Any ideas how to fix bug 1645 ?

2019-08-14 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Mark, On 14.08.2019 06:10, Mark Hessling wrote: > I had the same issue when I made the changes to the CMake processing to build > the RPM.  To get the > configurability of update-alternatives I had to use a user-supplied spec file > rather than the > CMake-generated one. This appears to have

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Any ideas how to fix bug 1645 ?

2019-08-13 Thread Enrico Sorichetti via Oorexx-devel
Hello Mark, Rony IMO the logic to determine the installation directory structure is broken Create a test directory with the following CMakeLists.txt #[[ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMakeLists.txt Copyright Enrico Sorichetti 2018 - 2019

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Any ideas how to fix bug 1645 ?

2019-08-13 Thread Mark Hessling
Hi Rony, I had the same issue when I made the changes to the CMake processing to build the RPM.  To get the configurability of update-alternatives I had to use a user-supplied spec file rather than the CMake-generated one. This appears to have caused CMake to not understand where the generated

[Oorexx-devel] Any ideas how to fix bug 1645 ?

2019-08-13 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, reports a problem when using CMake to create a rpm package for ooRexx on Linux (used to work) using the command "cpack ./" after successfully running "cmake -DBUILD_RPM=1 -DOS_DIST=fedora -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release path-2-oorexx-trunk"