Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
I closed that bug because the original submitter of the bug refused to
provide a test case that demonstrated the bug. So, I had to build my own
test case, and my test case worked fine.
There was nothing in the original report that suggested a problem
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge
jn.ml.sfrg...@letterboxes.org wrote:
Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
I closed that bug because the original submitter of the bug refused to
provide a test case that demonstrated the bug. So, I had to build my own
test
Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge
jn.ml.sfrg...@letterboxes.org wrote:
There was nothing in the original report that suggested a problem with a
MIME message, though.
But he did. He said: Try changing the message text in
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge
jn.ml.sfrg...@letterboxes.org wrote:
Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
Right. You brought it up here again. I explained why I closed it. You
brought up several things you think are bugs. I said you should open up
bugs
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
... Bringing things up on the developer list is a much better way
to elicit comments than trying to put long discussions in a bug
report. There is probably only a few of us that read every bug
report.
I should have
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
... Bringing things up on the developer list is a much better way
to elicit comments than trying to put long discussions in a bug
report.
Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm in total agreement with Jerry on this one. This is an area I have a
little bit of expertise, having written the Apache javamail
implementation.
Okay, I'll go back and look
Jeremy,
I closed that bug because the original submitter of the bug refused to
provide a test case that demonstrated the bug. So, I had to build my
own test case, and my test case worked fine.
I appreciate the work you do on bugs. I would like all bugs in ooRexx
to be fixed. I know if you
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
So, please open up a new bug. ;-)
Jeremy,
I should have said open up a bug for each issue you think is a bug.
Opening up one bug for several different bugs just makes it harder to
work with the bug and less likely it
I'm in total agreement with Jerry on this one. This is an area I have a
little bit of expertise, having written the Apache javamail implementation.
Rick
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge
jn.ml.sfrg...@letterboxes.org wrote:
Well: this is a test line.
I
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm in total agreement with Jerry on this one. This is an area I have a
little bit of expertise, having written the Apache javamail implementation.
Okay, I'll go back and look at that more closely.
My reading of the
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge
jn.ml.sfrg...@letterboxes.org wrote:
...
However it's quite unclear to me from the original report whether the
message the user was trying to send consisted of a bunch of headers, then a
blank line, then the error message, or
12 matches
Mail list logo