[Oorexx-users] (no subject)

-- Kind regards ___ Oorexx-users mailing list Oorexx-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-users

Re: [Oorexx-users] (no subject)

Chip, The trouble with this suggestion is that a simple typo could *create* a new directory, which must then be manually deleted. Of course one could make the same mistrake with "mkdir" itself, but there the irror would be more obvious :-) Les On 2/4/2016 1:26 PM, Chip Davis wrote: > IMHO

Re: [Oorexx-users] (no subject)

I find the Regina OS/2 Help just as confusing! First, it starts with a simple declarative and non-contradictory sentence: - clip - Returns the current directory for the running process, and optionally changes directory to the specified new directory. - eclip - I've seen this

Re: [Oorexx-users] (no subject)

Reasonable (but wishful) thinking... This reminds me of the value bif (returns current value and optionally sets the new value) Greetings Walter -- Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance

Re: [Oorexx-users] (no subject)

- clip - returns the current directory, first changing it to NewDirectory if an argument is supplied and the named directory exists. If NewDirectory is not specified, the name of the current directory is returned. Otherwise, an attempt is made to change to the specified NewDirectory. If

Re: [Oorexx-users] (no subject)

Hi Bert, this thread has suddenly become quite complex and sensitive. I hope that the nuances in my reply come through. Firstly, I did see your response about your experience on VM. I would not expect VM to behave in the same way as Windows. The filesystem is different. It is nearly a

Re: [Oorexx-users] (no subject)

On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Jon Wolfers wrote: > > Now, given that it isn't possible to have all rexx interpreters working > exactly the same, because we see such a spread of behaviour, and that the > current behaviour in ooRexx for Windows and Linux has been in place

[Oorexx-users] (no subject)

Hi Jon, . > I would say that this is a documentation bug as the documentation lists > two different behaviours which can't both be right, and the code only > displays one of these behaviors. I think my earlier email about find a VM/CMS example went though, but in case it didn't (I sent it from

Re: [Oorexx-users] (no subject)

at this point to *promise* to do so any time soon. Atb, Oliver From: Bertram Moshier [mailto:bertrammosh...@gmail.com] Sent: 27 February 2015 22:09 To: oorexx-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Oorexx-users] (no subject) Hello again Oliver, Sounds a bit weird - don?t know if I

[Oorexx-users] (no subject)

Hello again Oliver, Sounds a bit weird - don?t know if I can help, but what kind of dialog is it ? i.e. what?s its superclass (e.g. UserDialog)? Oh, weird?! Ah. Well, I'm learning to the ooDialog by using bits and pieces of sample code. Thus maybe I'm incorrectly using a call or something.

[Oorexx-users] (no subject)

Hello David and all others, The rexxc program (supplied with ooRexx) can remove the ability of anyone from seeing the original source code. But be sure to save a copy of the original source as you can not get it back from the code produced by rexxc Thank you so very much! Bert.

[Oorexx-users] (no subject)

The Open Object Rexx Development Team is proud to announce the availability of ooRexx 4.1.2. This is a bug fix only release, with 15 to 20 bugs fixed. Installation packages for ooRexx are available immediately on SourceForge. You can download ooRexx 4.1.2 from: