On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
> Gabriel Dos Reis writes:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
>>> Gabriel Dos Reis writes:
>>>
Aleksej Saushev writes:
| Gabriel Dos Reis
| writes:
|
| > For trunk (and therefore Open
Gabriel Dos Reis writes:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
>> Gabriel Dos Reis writes:
>>
>>> Aleksej Saushev writes:
>>>
>>> | Gabriel Dos Reis
>>> | writes:
>>> |
>>> | > For trunk (and therefore OpenAxiom-1.5.0) I would like to
>>> | > require C++11 -- we've already
2013/4/3 Aleksej Saushev :
> Even CentOS uses 4.4 or even 4.2 as their main compiler
I think keyword here is "main".
One can use CXX variable for ./configure
--
Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
> Gabriel Dos Reis writes:
>
>> Aleksej Saushev writes:
>>
>> | Gabriel Dos Reis
>> | writes:
>> |
>> | > For trunk (and therefore OpenAxiom-1.5.0) I would like to
>> | > require C++11 -- we've already switched to C++, but we
>> | > were us
Gabriel Dos Reis writes:
> Aleksej Saushev writes:
>
> | Gabriel Dos Reis
> | writes:
> |
> | > For trunk (and therefore OpenAxiom-1.5.0) I would like to
> | > require C++11 -- we've already switched to C++, but we
> | > were using C++03.
> | >
> | > There are decent support for this version o
Aleksej Saushev writes:
| Gabriel Dos Reis
| writes:
|
| > For trunk (and therefore OpenAxiom-1.5.0) I would like to
| > require C++11 -- we've already switched to C++, but we
| > were using C++03.
| >
| > There are decent support for this version of the language
| > out there (e.g. C++, Clang+
Gabriel Dos Reis
writes:
> For trunk (and therefore OpenAxiom-1.5.0) I would like to
> require C++11 -- we've already switched to C++, but we
> were using C++03.
>
> There are decent support for this version of the language
> out there (e.g. C++, Clang++, EDG, etc.) My question to
> packagers is
Игорь Пашев writes:
| 2013/4/3 Gabriel Dos Reis :
| > Hi,
| >
| > For trunk (and therefore OpenAxiom-1.5.0) I would like to
| > require C++11 -- we've already switched to C++, but we
| > were using C++03.
| >
| > There are decent support for this version of the language
| > out there (e.g. C++, C
2013/4/3 Gabriel Dos Reis :
> Hi,
>
> For trunk (and therefore OpenAxiom-1.5.0) I would like to
> require C++11 -- we've already switched to C++, but we
> were using C++03.
>
> There are decent support for this version of the language
> out there (e.g. C++, Clang++, EDG, etc.) My question to
> pac
Hi,
For trunk (and therefore OpenAxiom-1.5.0) I would like to
require C++11 -- we've already switched to C++, but we
were using C++03.
There are decent support for this version of the language
out there (e.g. C++, Clang++, EDG, etc.) My question to
packagers is whether it would be a problem -- e
10 matches
Mail list logo
