Committed to rel_1_6_0 and beyond. Thanks, guys.
-b
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Dan Wells d...@calvin.edu wrote:
Yes, this appears to be a better solution in all respects.
Thanks Bill.
--
*
Daniel
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Bill Ott b...@grpl.org wrote:
On 1/14/10 4:46 PM, Dan Wells wrote:
Hello all,
We have noticed a small bug in the optional automatic voiding of Lost
Fees. The transaction is not marked as finished, as I believe it should be
if there are no other billings
Yes, this appears to be a better solution in all respects.
Thanks Bill.
--
*
Daniel Wells, Library Programmer Analyst d...@calvin.edu
Hekman Library at Calvin College
616.526.7133
On 1/18/2010 at 1:07 PM, Bill
Hello all,
We have noticed a small bug in the optional automatic voiding of Lost Fees.
The transaction is not marked as finished, as I believe it should be if there
are no other billings (it still shows in the LOST area on the user's account).
I am wondering if more logic will be needed for
On 1/14/10 4:46 PM, Dan Wells wrote:
Hello all,
We have noticed a small bug in the optional automatic voiding of Lost Fees.
The transaction is not marked as finished, as I believe it should be if there
are no other billings (it still shows in the LOST area on the user's account).
I am
