Hi,
Thanks, folks. I've opened https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1830749
for bumping up the minimum to 9.6.
Regards,
Galen
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 9:58 AM Bill Erickson wrote:
> +1 for PG 9.6 for EG 3.4.
>
> -b
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 9:06 AM Daniel Wells wrote:
>
>> Here's a
+1 for PG 9.6 for EG 3.4.
-b
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 9:06 AM Daniel Wells wrote:
> Here's a third vote for upping to 9.6. We've been on 9.6 on Ubuntu 16.04
> since December. No complaints.
>
> Dan
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 8:33 AM Boyer, Jason A
> wrote:
>
>> I would also shy away from
Here's a third vote for upping to 9.6. We've been on 9.6 on Ubuntu 16.04
since December. No complaints.
Dan
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 8:33 AM Boyer, Jason A
wrote:
> I would also shy away from making 10 the minimum for 3.4 because I worry
> that we haven't shaken out the last compatibility
I would also shy away from making 10 the minimum for 3.4 because I worry that
we haven't shaken out the last compatibility issues, but I think we should
definitely aim for 10 or 11 for 3.5. I've been running 9.6 in production since
November so I would say it's a pretty safe choice to carry us
Galen, et al.,
I think it is too soon to require Pg 10. While we advertise Evergreen as
working with Pg 10, we don't actually install it on Ubnuntu 18.04 via
the prerequisites. We install Pg 9.6 instead.
We've found a few places already where set returning functions have
caused us hangups in Pg
Hi,
The patch for bug 1789679 has inspired me to pose a question: is it time to
bump up the minimum required version of PostgreSQL?
Currently the minimum required Pg version for all supported versions of
Evergreen is 9.4. The last time we changed that requirement was in
September of 2017.
Pg
