, at 10:02 AM, Hardy, Elaine
eha...@georgialibraries.org wrote:
If I understand correctly, you want a user to be able, from the
result list and the OPAC view, to see a list of the libraries in the
|9 on the
856 along with the link to the e-resource where they would normally
see a list
If I understand correctly, you want a user to be able, from the result
list and the OPAC view, to see a list of the libraries in the |9 on the
856 along with the link to the e-resource where they would normally see a
list of barcoded items with their call numbers, etc.?
How would a record where
Doug,
This does sound very helpful. Thank you!
One potential problem would occur if a copy location owned by one branch
is applied to the copy owned by another. This typically occurs when a
template is created for one branch and then used in the item editor for
any or all other branches. While
The TPAC does support copy and volume level holds -- at least in the staff
client. In PINES, patrons can only place title level holds, so I don't
know whether they are supported.
In 2.3, and I hope in 2.4, holds can be placed in holdings maintenance and
in Item status. These are for staff
are represented in
multiple ways (v. 1, vol. 1, volume 1, v1, etc.). With this development,
access to this would still be controlled by a permission so each
implementation would decide who has permissions to make changes on this.
Tim
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Hardy, Elaine
eha
in Evergreen and related to identify how holds can be placed.
Tim
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Hardy, Elaine
eha...@georgialibraries.org wrote:
Do you mean that the call number has the vols represented differently or
that your labels for monographic parts are different? I thought that how
the vol
Under use case #2, how would you then configure the system so that you
could easily remove the item from storage to available in a case where
storage is a temporary status?
Elaine
_
J. Elaine Hardy
PINES Bibliographic Projects Metadata Manager
Georgia Public Library Service
1800
Reminder of the change in OCLC number effective July 2013
Elaine
_
J. Elaine Hardy
PINES Bibliographic Projects Metadata Manager
Georgia Public Library Service
1800 Century Place, Ste 150
Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304
404.235-7128
404.235-7201, fax
eha...@georgialibraries.org
Elliot,
In the screen shot, I don’t see anything under service and credentials
other than local catalog and even that isn’t checked. Although I can’t read
the error since I don’t speak that language, I suspect that the problem is
the interface doesn’t know where to search since it hasn’t
Development Discussion List
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Monograph Parts
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Hardy, Elaine
eha...@georgialibraries.org wrote:
Dan -- I think it would be beneficial to allow a complete set to be
available to be targeted for a hold placed for a specific volume. But,
I dont
Yes -- PINES libraries take different approaches to mutivolume sets. We do
find the differences in approach to multivols primarily in DVDs and
audiobooks and not in print material. We actively discourage creating
separate bib records for a multipart-set or serial but libraries can and
do attach
Mike,
This is a great idea, particularly the holds prompt. Could you go into a
little more detail on how this would function on the user side, both
patron and cataloging staff? I'm particularly interested in how this would
function in a consortium like PINES where different libraries might
, February 16, 2011 12:56 PM
To: Evergreen Development Discussion List
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Monograph Parts
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Hardy, Elaine
eha...@georgialibraries.org wrote:
Mike,
This is a great idea, particularly the holds prompt. Could you go into
a little more detail
Like
Elaine
J. Elaine Hardy
PINES Bibliographic Projects and Metadata Manager
Georgia Public Library Service,
A Unit of the University System of Georgia
1800 Century Place, Suite 150
Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304
404.235-7128
404.235-7201, fax
eha...@georgialibraries.org
www.georgialibraries.org
The 007 field will have the specific video formats. IF your records have
the field and IF it is coded correctly.
Elaine
J. Elaine Hardy
PINES Bibliographic Projects and Metadata Manager
Georgia Public Library Service,
A Unit of the University System of Georgia
1800 Century Place, Suite 150
Jason can certainly correct me if I am wrong, but one of the reasons the
functionality is so basic for spine and pocket labels is that they just ran out
of time. We had many discussions about creating the ability to easily print
spine labels to any printer using most any label stock. But, the
The ability to easily print sheet labels (spine and pocket) would be fantastic.
As would better call number wrapping and multiple templates
Elaine
J. Elaine Hardy
PINES Bibliographic Projects Metadata Manager
Georgia Public Library Service
1800 Century Place, Ste 150
Atlanta, Ga.
Ryan,
What is the status of the hold? If it is waiting for copy, the holds targeter
has not grabbed a specific copy for the hold. waiting for capture is the
status you want in order to be able to capture the hold
Elaine
J. Elaine Hardy
PINES Bibliographic Projects Metadata Manager
Luca,
Are you using an OCLC login and password for cataloging? You do have to have an
account with OCLC.
Elaine
J. Elaine Hardy
PINES Bibliographic Projects Metadata Manager
Georgia Public Library Service
1800 Century Place, Ste 150
Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304
404.235-7128
Anne,
I would run a report of each shelving location (such a DVD), sorting by call
number or what ever sort you need. You could either print out the report or
just save it to a file. Then you could mark the list with action taken (if you
need that information) and where you stopped.
Or you
While I would not describe this as duplicate barcodes because of the potential
problems around that, PINES would like to see multiple bibliographic records
linked to one barcode. Some ILSs refer to this as parent -child or bound-with .
Our current use case: Some of our libraries are
I've been looking into this for our libraries. I've found 2 ways that
nonEvergreen libraries appear to be handling the devices. They have a record
for the device alone. I have not determined yet if they circulate just the
Kindle or if they have titles downloaded and a list available outside the
Is she using the Z39.50 to search OCLC? If she reopens the Z39.50 interface,
does it restore the results retrieved on researching? If so, when she gets 0
results in this sequence, have her verify that her login has not been over
typed. It is very easy to accidentally modify the login without
Never mind my earlier post --- I just recreated the problem here.
Elaine
J. Elaine Hardy
PINES Bibliographic Projects Metadata Manager
Georgia Public Library Service
1800 Century Place, Ste 150
Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304
404.235-7128
404.235-7201, fax
eha...@georgialibraries.org
Stuart,
Thirty seconds is an unusually long time for search to return from OCLC in the
Z39.50 interface. Searches with large result sets can take a little longer than
a search under 10 records to populate, but not that long. Certainly searches
with fewer than 10 records in the result set only
Steve,
This is a known issue. As I understand it, on some occasions, when a record is
imported, the fingerprint that facilitates searching is not created in MARC XML
-- at least for author, title, subject searches. The title is retrievable by
the title control number. We currently have a
Grant,
Is this a problem you are having with 1.4? We have not had a problem viewing
the MARC record before importing in either our current install or the testing
of 1.4.
Viewing is slightly different in 1.4 since you either have to scroll or hide
the top pane.
Elaine
J. Elaine Hardy
I think it would be very beneficial to be able to merge patron records,
particularly in a large consortium like PINES. But it would need to be
very tightly controlled -- more so than merging bib records. This is
particularly important since so many libraries send their delinquent
patrons to a
, can be from Home, a keyword search, or can be from
Advanced a keyword search.
Some searches work, some seem to hang and not return results.
Frances
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Hardy, Elaine
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 12:25 PM
Robert,
Under rules for MARC, all you really need is a 245 (title) field to be a
record. It would be of dubious use, but would technically be a MARC
record. As far as I have seen as a user, the issues with brief records
in Evergreen are the same as with any ILS and are mainly in retrieval
Since some libraries allow holds on acquisition items with on order
status, will that status be configurable to allow holds?
Elaine
J. Elaine Hardy
Library Services Manager - Collections Reference
Georgia Public Library Service,
A Unit of the University
Charlene,
1) I can't really help with this question. I've not seen that error
message when I've searched OCLC via the Z39.50 gateway. For an incorrect
OCLC login, I usually get the message Server Error: Z3950_LOGIN_FAILED :
The login failed. PINES only imports records from OCLC so I have never
Thank you, Mike. I have been trying to test some of the new features on
dev.gapines all week and have not had a chance. I will do my best to get
to the point early next week where I can test this and some of the other
things y'all have added.
Elaine
J. Elaine Hardy
Library Services Manager
Patrick,
The added entry was not showing up in the opac display because the MARC
record was incorrectly coded and incorrectly cataloged. In the case of
this record, it had only a passing familiarity with MARC. Unfortunately,
the PINES database is resplendent with very dreadful records that
Patrick,
The 700 field in a MARC record is an author field. It is used when there
are either multiple authors for the item (since the 1xx fields are not
repeatable) or when the person responsible for the work is an editor. So
we do want an author search to include the 700 field.
Elaine Hardy
35 matches
Mail list logo
