SPAM: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Thinking about receiving

2008-08-12 Thread Lori Bowen Ayre
I'll try again to chime into this thread...I think my last message was blocked. I'm going to jump in here and suggest that someone needs to get familiar with ASN (advanced shipment notificiation) which allows the libraries to electronically receive their materials rather than having to check in

Re: SPAM: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Thinking about receiving

2008-08-12 Thread Bill Erickson
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:34:43 -0400, Lori Bowen Ayre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll try again to chime into this thread...I think my last message was blocked. I'm going to jump in here and suggest that someone needs to get familiar with ASN (advanced shipment notificiation) which allows the

Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Thinking about receiving

2008-07-28 Thread Bill Erickson
On Sunday 27 July 2008 11:19 Mike Rylander wrote: On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Bill Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 24 July 2008 8:54 David J. Fiander wrote: [snip] The primary field on the receiving screen is an ISBN input field. The staff scan the ISBN barcode on

RE: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Thinking about receiving

2008-07-28 Thread Bryan Baldus
On Thursday, July 24, 2008 7:55 PM, David J. Fiander wrote: The primary field on the receiving screen is an ISBN input field. The staff scan the ISBN barcode on each item, which pulls up the corresponding JUB. The system would need some way of dealing with duplicate (reused) ISBNs or items with

Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Thinking about receiving

2008-07-28 Thread David Fiander
Bryan, You're absolutely right, and I'd already thought of dealing with items without ISBNs, at least. But for the initial development, I think we need to focus on the simplest and most common case of items with unique ISBNs. On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Bryan Baldus [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Thinking about receiving

2008-07-28 Thread Carri L. Oviatt
David, This sounds like a lot of thought has been put into the process. One question about the invoice #. Many times we only receive a packing list with the books/media that are being received. Would we then have to wait for an invoice? If so, that could really slow things down. As

Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Thinking about receiving

2008-07-28 Thread David Fiander
Carri, The packing slip doesn't have an invoice # on it? If that's the case, perhaps MIke's idea about using the PO # is better. I'm a bit concerned about shipments containing odd mixtures of items from various POs; it seems more likely that a shipment will match an invoice than that it will

Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Thinking about receiving

2008-07-28 Thread Carri L. Oviatt
David Fiander [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/28/2008 9:40 AM Carri, The packing slip doesn't have an invoice # on it? --Sometimes, but not always. I do like the idea of tying the receipt to an invoice. Especially since many of our invoices are electronically downloaded. Will there be some way of

Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Thinking about receiving

2008-07-27 Thread Bill Erickson
On Thursday 24 July 2008 8:54 David J. Fiander wrote: Receiving needs to be efficient, since it's most definitely a materials handling process above everything else. Imagine that the staff have opened a box and dug out the packing slip / invoice. Once they've checked that against the

SPAM: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Thinking about receiving

2008-07-25 Thread Lori Bowen Ayre
I'm going to jump in here and suggest that someone needs to get familiar with ASN (advanced shipment notificiation) which allows the libraries to electronically receive their materials rather than having to check in each item one at a time. Essentially, once the shipment contents is verified (one