Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Windows 7 64 bit compatibility issues?

2011-11-03 Thread Evette Atkin
The receipt printers are Epson TM-T88IV Model #M129H. The big printer in the office is a Zerox Phaser 7400. Evette M. Atkin Evergreen Coordinator Midwest Collaborative for Library Services 1407 Rensen St., Suite 1, Lansing, MI 48910-3657 Phone (800)530-9019 ext 152 Fax (517)492-3808

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Windows 7 64 bit compatibility issues?

2011-11-03 Thread Aaron Zsembery
What happens when they try to print a Windows test page on these printers, or from another program? What happens if you print to a virtual printer (like CutePDF) from Evergreen? Aaron Z Jr. Systems Administrator Pioneer Library System 2557 State Rt. 21 Canandaigua, New York 14424 Phone:

[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] FW: LC Publishes Initial Plan for Bibliographic Framework Transition

2011-11-03 Thread Hardy, Elaine
FYI Elaine   J. Elaine Hardy PINES Bibliographic Projects and Metadata Manager Georgia Public Library Service, A Unit of the University System of Georgia 1800 Century Place, Suite 150 Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304 404.235-7128 404.235-7201, fax eha...@georgialibraries.org www.georgialibraries.org

[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Circ Modifiers not working as expected

2011-11-03 Thread John Morris
Obviously I'm missing some basic assumption about how circ modifiers work. Up until now we didn't need them, as we managed to get all of our policies implemented without them. But we are just starting to circulate laptops and they can't be shoehorned in. So in addition to the default policy the

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Circ Modifiers not working as expected

2011-11-03 Thread Thomas Berezansky
Circ matchpoint rules without a defined circulation modifier will match *any* circulation modifiers. This is an extension of the more generic rule of an empty match field in the circ or hold matrix matches anything - that is, if you don't fill in a field (leaving it NULL in the DB) then it

[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Evergreen documentation

2011-11-03 Thread Sally Fortin
Friends and Colleagues, Many in the Evergreen community have expressed a desire for more documentation describing new features in Evergreen. Others have requested that those who write documentation produce it in more formats, including asciidoc. ESI trainers and developers have been

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Evergreen documentation

2011-11-03 Thread Dan Scott
Hi Sally! On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Sally Fortin sfor...@esilibrary.com wrote: Friends and Colleagues, Many in the Evergreen community have expressed a desire for more documentation describing new features in Evergreen.  Others have requested that those who write documentation produce

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] [OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION] Evergreen documentation

2011-11-03 Thread Mike Rylander
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Dan Scott d...@coffeecode.net wrote: Hi Sally! On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Sally Fortin sfor...@esilibrary.com wrote: Friends and Colleagues, Many in the Evergreen community have expressed a desire for more documentation describing new features in

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] [OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION] Evergreen documentation

2011-11-03 Thread Mike Rylander
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Mike Rylander mrylan...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Dan Scott d...@coffeecode.net wrote: Hi Sally! On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Sally Fortin sfor...@esilibrary.com wrote: Friends and Colleagues, Many in the Evergreen community have

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] [OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION] Evergreen documentation

2011-11-03 Thread Chris Cormack
On 4 November 2011 10:15, Mike Rylander mrylan...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Mike Rylander mrylan...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Dan Scott d...@coffeecode.net wrote: Hi Sally! On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Sally Fortin sfor...@esilibrary.com wrote:

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] [OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION] Evergreen documentation

2011-11-03 Thread Mike Rylander
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Chris Cormack ch...@bigballofwax.co.nz wrote: On 4 November 2011 10:15, Mike Rylander mrylan...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Mike Rylander mrylan...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Dan Scott d...@coffeecode.net wrote: Hi

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] [OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION] Evergreen documentation

2011-11-03 Thread Chris Cormack
On 4 November 2011 10:56, Mike Rylander mrylan...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm playing devils advocate, do you think they will respect the NC clause any more than they respected by BY-SA ? That's a point that was raised, and I think that the point has merit -- some that would avoid attributing a

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] [OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION] Evergreen documentation

2011-11-03 Thread Mike Rylander
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Chris Cormack ch...@bigballofwax.co.nz wrote: On 4 November 2011 10:56, Mike Rylander mrylan...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm playing devils advocate, do you think they will respect the NC clause any more than they respected by BY-SA ? That's a point that was raised,

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] [OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION] Evergreen documentation

2011-11-03 Thread Lori Bowen Ayre
Mike, This makes sense to me. Everyone who contributes to the project should get their contributions recognized and when entities outside of the community pop in and make someone else's hard work look like their contribution, it hurts the legitimate Evergreen service providers who are