If by siloing you mean that parts of the community with interest in a
specialized topic (which may or may not be of immediate interest to the rest of
the community) can discuss issues on that topic using a mailing list dedicated
to that topic, I'm not bother by it ;) It's not like we are
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Lazar, Alexey Vladimirovich
alexey.la...@mnsu.edu wrote:
If by siloing you mean that parts of the community with interest in a
specialized topic (which may or may not be of immediate interest to the rest
of the community) can discuss issues on that topic using
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 8:34 AM, rogan.ha...@yclibrary.net wrote:
Quoting Galen Charlton g...@esilibrary.com:
However, I would like to riff off a comment that Dan Scott made on IRC
earlier today: if a sysadmin list gets created but folks start
answering questions with the response You're on
I'd be in general a -1 also simply because the open-ils-general list isn't
too crowded with communication. I don't think we want to create additional
lists unless one communication channel is so crowded with discussion that a
topic gets lost in the conversation.
Tim Spindler
C/W MARS
On Tue,
I'm neither a +1 nor a -1 on this topic. What I would like to say relative
to this topic, however, is that I hope people will step out on a limb and
put their questions and comments out there one way or another. At the
conference, I heard from many people that they were reluctant about posting
I agree with Lori. I think she hit the nail on the head.
Tim
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Lori Bowen Ayre lori.a...@galecia.comwrote:
I'm neither a +1 nor a -1 on this topic. What I would like to say
relative to this topic, however, is that I hope people will step out on a
limb and put
Quoting Galen Charlton g...@esilibrary.com:
However, I would like to riff off a comment that Dan Scott made on IRC
earlier today: if a sysadmin list gets created but folks start
answering questions with the response You're on the wrong list! Go
away!, I would immediately move to collapse
+1
Quoting Justin Hopkins jus...@mobiusconsortium.org:
We just wrapped up the post-conference systems administrator training,
which was awesome. Afterwards we were talking about the utility of a
new discussion list focused on Evergreen systems administration.
I think the topic is deep enough
I also think it's a great
idea.
J
Lazar, Alexey Vladimirovich
May 1, 2012 10:12
AM
Yes, this is an excellent
idea. Alexey LazarPALSInformation System Developer and
Integrator507-389-2907http://www.mnpals.org/
Justin Hopkins
April 30, 2012
8:11 PM
I'm -1 to this proposal.
For many years, I've mused with other Evergreen system administrators on
the issues facing our particular role and areas for discussion. The
idea of making our own mailing list seemed like a good idea at many
points in those discussions, and if you asked me a few
-1
I want to show a little solidarity with Ben on this issue, admitting up
front that I'm not in practice the sysadmin of any Evergreen site.
It's absolutely great for the sysadmin community to communicate and
share more; that will be only a win for the project in general whether
you do it
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] ***SPAM*** Re: Should we have a systems
administrators list?
I'm -1 to this proposal.
For many years, I've mused with other Evergreen system administrators on the
issues facing our particular role and areas for discussion. The idea of
making our
12 matches
Mail list logo
