Hi,
On Jun 26, 2011, at 8:14 AM, Dan Scott wrote:
Alternately, we could teach open-ils.cat.biblio.record.xml.create to
set 008/00-05 if they are blank or a placeholder value. The trigger is
probably more versatile, as it would handle direct loads into the
database and records created via
-ILS-GENERAL] 008 field and leader
Hi all,
The IISG in Amsterdam is running EG 2.0.3. We noticed that the 008 field
always starts with 070101, presumably January first 2007. Could anyone tell us
how to have this date changed automatically when entering a new record? Is it
possible to have
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org
Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 008 field and leader
Hi all,
The IISG in Amsterdam is running EG 2.0.3. We noticed that the 008 field
always starts with 070101, presumably January first 2007. Could anyone
tell us
how
Hi,
On Jun 25, 2011, at 16:39, Dan Scott d...@coffeecode.net wrote:
We could add an ON CREATE trigger on biblio.record_entry to set the
first six characters of 008 (if it exists in the record - I'm not sure
we want to get into the business of creating 008 fields from scratch)
by invoking
Hi all,
The IISG in Amsterdam is running EG 2.0.3. We noticed that the 008 field always
starts with 070101, presumably January first 2007. Could anyone tell us how to
have this date changed automatically when entering a new record? Is it possible
to have a computer generated date in this
Mieke,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 08:41:56AM -0400, Mieke Stroo wrote:
The positions 0-4 and 12-16 in the leader are unclear to us. According
to the MARC 21 standard this information should be computer generated.
Is it alright to use a set number (00620) for the positions 0-4 and
leave the
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Paul Hoffman p...@flo.org wrote:
Mieke,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 08:41:56AM -0400, Mieke Stroo wrote:
The positions 0-4 and 12-16 in the leader are unclear to us. According
to the MARC 21 standard this information should be computer generated.
Is it alright to
