Or added to the post-subscribe welcome message.
Regards,
Justin Hopkins
Coordinator, IT Web Services
MOBIUS Consortium Office
c: 573-808-2309
--sent from a mobile device--
On Apr 30, 2012, at 7:07 PM, Jason Etheridge ja...@esilibrary.com wrote:
though maybe it could be subsumed by a
Jason,
If we could incorporate the Communication Guidelines that the Web Team came
up with to the monthly welcome message, that would be very useful. Could
it go out automatically?
Lori
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Jason Etheridge ja...@esilibrary.comwrote:
I volunteered to pull the
+1
Quoting Justin Hopkins jus...@mobiusconsortium.org:
We just wrapped up the post-conference systems administrator training,
which was awesome. Afterwards we were talking about the utility of a
new discussion list focused on Evergreen systems administration.
I think the topic is deep enough
I heartily concur.
-Vicki
On Apr 30, 2012, at 7:11 PM, Justin Hopkins wrote:
We just wrapped up the post-conference systems administrator training,
which was awesome. Afterwards we were talking about the utility of a
new discussion list focused on Evergreen systems administration.
I
+1
Sent from my iPad
On May 1, 2012, at 9:22 AM, Victoria Bush
vb...@ilstu.edumailto:vb...@ilstu.edu wrote:
I heartily concur.
-Vicki
On Apr 30, 2012, at 7:11 PM, Justin Hopkins wrote:
We just wrapped up the post-conference systems administrator training,
which was awesome. Afterwards we
I tend to think that everyone attending a public function should
expect to be recorded but I don't know what Indiana's laws may be. I
think your approach is reasonable Dan.
+1
Quoting Dan Scott d...@coffeecode.net:
Hi folks:
Those of you who made it to Saturday's early-morning update
If we could incorporate the Communication Guidelines that the Web Team came
up with to the monthly welcome message, that would be very useful. Could it
go out automatically?
We can automate just about anything. :)
--
Jason Etheridge
| Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts
|
Yes, this is an excellent idea.
Alexey Lazar
PALS
Information System Developer and Integrator
507-389-2907
http://www.mnpals.org/
On Apr 30, 2012, at 20:11 , Justin Hopkins wrote:
We just wrapped up the post-conference systems administrator training,
which was awesome. Afterwards we were
One thing we'd like to see improved with the current workflow
http://goo.gl/5AhcP is an option for more streamlined electronic orders (e.g.
When Provider accepts electronic orders = yes).
The basic use case is where electronic orders are accepted but not via EDI --
instead, just classic
I also think it's a great
idea.
J
Lazar, Alexey Vladimirovich
May 1, 2012 10:12
AM
Yes, this is an excellent
idea. Alexey LazarPALSInformation System Developer and
Integrator507-389-2907http://www.mnpals.org/
Justin Hopkins
April 30, 2012
8:11 PM
George,
I'm not sure I understand what you are saying. The workflow diagram says
that if you are not ordering through EDI, print the order. If I understand
you correctly, you may have a situation where you orderd on Amazon but you
will also be maintaining a separate record in Evergreen
Hello Tim,
Correct. Just trying to capture some essential purchase details in more
streamlined way.
George
From: open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Tim
Spindler
Sent: May
Yes!
Martha Driscoll
Systems Manager
North of Boston Library Exchange
Danvers, Massachusetts
www.noblenet.org
On 4/30/2012 8:11 PM, Justin Hopkins wrote:
We just wrapped up the post-conference systems administrator training,
which was awesome. Afterwards we were talking about the utility of a
Hi Sharon,
Thanks for bringing this discussion to the mailing list. Regarding the
items on your top ten list, I will offer my input on how development can
address these issues in the related LaunchPad bug for each one (or
create a new bug where there isn't already one for an issue) over the
I'm -1 to this proposal.
For many years, I've mused with other Evergreen system administrators on
the issues facing our particular role and areas for discussion. The
idea of making our own mailing list seemed like a good idea at many
points in those discussions, and if you asked me a few
-1
I want to show a little solidarity with Ben on this issue, admitting up
front that I'm not in practice the sysadmin of any Evergreen site.
It's absolutely great for the sysadmin community to communicate and
share more; that will be only a win for the project in general whether
you do it
I agree with Ben. Obviously, if a certain community sub-group decides it
wants to create their own mailing list, there is no Evergreen police to stop
you, but I think doing so is a mistake.
One of the strengths of the Evergreen community that I think we've worked at
is the lack of formal
Hi,
For folks using serials, what version are you on 2.1.? Is there anyone
using serials on 2.0.2?
In chatting with people at the conference I recall that Mieke and Dan S's
libraries are using serials and on a newer version than 2.0.x.
Does that mean that there are significant issues using
Hi Tara,
I think the best way to answer your question would be to direct you to
the serials section of the 2.1 release notes for what is effectively a
list of features you'll be missing.
http://open-ils.org/documentation/release/RELEASE_NOTES_2_1_0.html#_serials_enhancements
The list of new
Personally, I didn't envision a sys-admin group as a siloing but as an
opportunity for sys-admins to work on best practices and things that
may be redundant or repetitive on the dev list. I can easily see
conversations about how do we maintain 2.1 because we don't want to
upgrade to 2.2
Hi Lebbeous,
Thanks for your quick reply.
Looking at the 2.0 release notes I don't see much fleshed out about serials:
http://open-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=feature_list_2_0
I'm wondering if there's anyone who's actually using serials on a 2.0
release. I haven't been able to successfully set
Hi Lebbeous,
Thanks for your quick reply.
Looking at the 2.0 release notes I don't see much fleshed out about serials:
http://open-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=feature_list_2_0
I'm wondering if there's anyone who's actually using serials on a 2.0
release. I haven't been able to successfully set
Is Tagging enabled on the community mailman? Perhaps that is a solution
that could provide more granular review of the list threads without dividing
us up?
How does that work? My google-fu is weak. :)
One thing I'd like to avoid is getting into the whole manual
convention of tagging subject
I agree with Rogan. I think the idea is to have a discussion more focused on
system administration issues, rather then purely development, which is
currently defined as the sole purpose of the dev list. Even though there
likely would be membership overlap, having a sysadmin list would allow
I am in agreement with Rogan and Alexy. Although a member of the dev list I too
would like to see somewhere to discuss purely sysadmin ideas not really related
to dev.
Stuart Forrest PhD, ACM Professional Member
Library Systems Specialist
Beaufort County Library
311 Scott Street, Beaufort, SC
Hi,
On 5/1/2012 5:06 PM, Vyacheslav Tykhonov wrote:
As twitter website doesn't have archive, we're prepared twitter
report based on all tweets for Evergreen conference, and I would like
to share it with all attenders. You can read this report as Excel or
CSV file, so I hope it can be really
26 matches
Mail list logo
