Thanks, Anna!
Our problem is that we do not engage in resource sharing at the consortium
level. We have some libraries and library systems that share with each other,
but not across the board. Like you said, we’d like to see patrons able to view
only those parts that are available to them.
It sounds like you have libraries that don’t share resources but make use of
monograph parts. Do their patrons ever experience issues requesting parts that
are not available to them? Right now, we’ve noticed that if a patron places a
hold on a part that’s not available to them, they get an error message stating
that they have reached the maximum number of holds which is kind of confusing
because we don’t have a maximum number of holds.
From: Open-ils-general
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Goben,
Anna
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 8:10 AM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Monograph Parts in Consortiums
Hi Sylvia,
In Indiana, we use parts heavily for resource sharing, so scoping to specific
branches/systems would actually work directly against our goals to maximize the
pool of available targets. What we have talked about instead is a way to scope
the holds on parts to only show those parts that are available to the patron
(either via transit or locally). Due to the complexity of our holds rules, we
do not anticipate that will happen any time soon though.
We have shared style guides to build our parts so that there aren’t unnecessary
duplications of parts and for sorting purposes. Also for high demand/heavily
parted titles, we have asked that even those libraries that aren’t resource
sharing use parts so that patrons have a consistent experience. It does mean
some extra work for your catalogers, especially up front for any major
collection, but in the long run, our patrons have indicated they really
appreciate the ability to request the specific part they want regardless of who
owns it. (And generally, they don’t care who owns it as long as they can get
it and get it quickly.)
-Anna
Anna Goben
Evergreen Indiana Coordinator
Indiana State Library
140 N Senate Ave
Indianapolis, IN 46204
317-234-6624
Fax: 317-232-3713
From: Open-ils-general
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Kathy
Lussier
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2018 11:25 AM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Monograph Parts in Consortiums
This is an EXTERNAL email. Exercise caution. DO NOT open attachments or
click links from unknown senders or unexpected email.
Hi Sylvia,
I do not know of a way to limit the display of parts to the scoped library
without development.
Just to give some background on this feature, one of the primary reasons it was
developed was precisely so that holds on a specific volume or disc could be
applied across the entire consortium. Prior to the existence of parts, the only
way to place a hold on a specific volume or disc was to place a volume-level
hold, which targets copies that share the same call number owned by the same
org unit. For our consortia, this was too limiting because we want our part
holds to be fillable by all libraries just as we do with title holds. We don't
use any hard or soft hold boundaries in our consortia that might limit which
libraries can fill a hold.
If you want to limit the holds to just holdings within the library or system,
you could probably refrain from adding parts, make the volume hold link
available to the public, and encourage them to place holds that way. However, I
think this would be very unintuitive and would lead to a lot of title holds on
the record that could be filled by a random volume.
Barring that, I think development would be required to get what you're looking
for.
Kathy
--
Kathy Lussier
Project Coordinator
Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
(508) 343-0128
kluss...@masslnc.org<mailto:kluss...@masslnc.org>
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Sylvia Orner
mailto:sor...@albright.org>> wrote:
Hi everyone,
We’ve recently had a couple of libraries in our consortium (SPARK) move towards
using monograph parts for things like manga.
We are now noticing that when patrons go to place a hold on a record with
monograph parts, they can chose from all parts that exist within the
consortium, not just those with holdings at their library or library system. I
understand that the parts are shared at the consortium level, but is there any
way to hide parts that are not associated with any holdings at the scoped
library or library system?
If it’s not possible, I would be interested in hearing how other consortiums
deal with monograph parts.
Thanks so much!
Sylvia Orner
Head of Technical Services
Scranton Public Library
2006 N. Main
Ave.<https://maps.google.com/?q=2006+N.+Main+Ave.+%0D%0A+Scranton,+PA+18508=gmail=g>
Scranto
