: Deana Cunningham deana.cunning...@granvillecounty.org
To: open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 6:23:20 PM
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Holds placed prior to status change (Hardy,
Elaine)
Elaine,
I see what you are saying, but I can minimize
: Friday, February 28, 2014 9:40 AM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Holds placed prior to status change (Hardy,
Elaine)
Hi Deanna,
Our libraries typically run reports to get lists of Missing items to check the
shelves for them on a regular basis. It's a much more
Leslie -
Unfortunately, if the holds aren't triggered automatically at check in staff
has no idea they need to go check and retarget holds for those items. I do
assume the cron job to look for holds would find an item with a recently
changed status, but I don't know as our's isn't working at
Hi Deanna,
These checkin modifiers were added in Release 2.2 (I believe).
From the Launchpad bug:
2 - Retarget Local Holds / Retarget All Statuses
When checking in items that are owned by the library and are In process (or,
with the second option selected, in general) attempt to find a local
/pines
From: open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of
Deana Cunningham
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 5:05 PM
To: open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org
Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Holds placed prior to status
We're new to Evergreen and have been struggling with holds on new items.
We've had issues with Find Another Target messing up the holds queue, but
we may have been doing it incorrectly.
When you say to Find Another Target for the hold on top of the queue,
Tina, do you mean the first hold that
...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of
Elisabeth Keppler
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 9:05 AM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Holds placed prior to status change
We're new to Evergreen and have been struggling with holds on new items.
We've had issues with Find Another
-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of
Elisabeth Keppler
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 9:05 AM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Holds placed prior to status change
We're new to Evergreen and have been struggling with holds on new items. We've
-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf Of *Elisabeth
Keppler
*Sent:* Thursday, February 27, 2014 9:05 AM
*To:* Evergreen Discussion Group
*Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Holds placed prior to status change
We're new to Evergreen and have been struggling with holds on new
Keppler
*Sent:* Thursday, February 27, 2014 9:05 AM
*To:* Evergreen Discussion Group
*Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Holds placed prior to status change
We're new to Evergreen and have been struggling with holds on new items.
We've had issues with Find Another Target messing up the holds
...@list.georgialibraries.org
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of
Elisabeth Keppler
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 9:46 AM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Holds placed prior to status change
Thanks, everyone. I really
, February 27, 2014 9:46 AM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Holds placed prior to status change
Thanks, everyone. I really appreciate how generous Evergreen
librarians are
with their knowledge and experience!
Out of curiosity, is it common practice out
Hi Lise,
When you say to Find Another Target for the hold on top of the queue,
Tina, do you mean the first hold that appears when we click on View Holds
for the record?
I mean the next hold that should be filled according to the adopted
hold filling method. Most of our libraries fill holds
Thanks, Tina. I wonder if being part of a consortium that uses age hold
protection will cause problems. If all of my library system's holds are
down a ways on the queue, would I select the highest hold for my system
rather than the top hold on the entire queue? Will this cause problems for
Hi Lise,
We have some groups of libraries/systems sharing resources among
themselves. Some of them libraries use age protect, too. But we don't
have consortium level resource sharing. I see multiple hold queues for
holds to be filled by different item groups on View Holds. So I guess
you
I've been analyzing our holds processes for a while and your conversation got
me going back around to do some double checking a couple of things. So we just
performed a test on the scenario presented; a copy is missing, then found,
checked-in but not immediately targeted; and reconfirmed what
Elaine,
I see what you are saying, but I can minimize the possibility of an
unsuspecting patron placing a hold by making missing items holdable but not
OPAC visible. If a staff person should place a hold for the patron without
noticing there are no items listed beneath the record in the staff
Hi great brain!
I was playing around today on our test server and have a question about hold
triggering. After an item has a status change to missing or trace, any
holds placed prior to that change are not getting triggered upon item check in.
I have tried checking the item in numerous times
Hi Deana,
If your 'missing' and 'trace' statuses are non-holdable, this is
probably the expected behaviour. We experience the same thing with our
hold targeter running every 15 mins for new holds (placed within 24
hours) and daily for old holds (placed 24 hours ago). So new holds may
be
19 matches
Mail list logo
