> On 03/08/2017 08:49 AM, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
> >> On 03/06/2017 09:21 AM, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> >>> refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> >>> used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> >>> a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> >>> refcounter
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:21:09PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
> >
Hi,
On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 09:00:33 -0800 (PST), The Lee-Man wrote :
> I would like to move the target-isns project, owned and managed by
> Christophe Vu-Brugier on github, under our open-iscsi project.
>
> Chris and Andy in particular, do you have any objections?
>
> See
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 09:00:33AM -0800, The Lee-Man wrote:
> I would like to move the target-isns project, owned and managed by
> Christophe Vu-Brugier on github, under our open-iscsi project.
>
> Chris and Andy in particular, do you have any objections?
>
> See
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:21:09PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
> situations.
>
On 03/08/2017 08:49 AM, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
>> On 03/06/2017 09:21 AM, Elena Reshetova wrote:
>>> refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
>>> used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
>>> a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
>>> refcounter overflows that
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 09:42:09AM +, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:20:55PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> > > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> > > a reference counter. This allows to avoid
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:20:57PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
> situations.
>
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:20:55PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
> situations.
I would like to move the target-isns project, owned and managed by
Christophe Vu-Brugier on github, under our open-iscsi project.
Chris and Andy in particular, do you have any objections?
See https://github.com/cvubrugier/target-isns for the target-isns project.
--
Lee Duncan
--
You
On 03/08/2017 02:48 PM, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
On 03/06/2017 03:21 PM, Elena Reshetova wrote:
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to
> On 03/06/2017 09:21 AM, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
> > situations.
> >
>
> On 03/06/2017 03:21 PM, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
> > situations.
>
>
On 07/03, Chris Leech wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 08:40:47PM +0100, Gorka Eguileor wrote:
> > On 21/02, Chris Leech wrote:
> > > > 4- Add a specific configuration option for the sessions to disable
> > > > automatic scans, as proposed by the patch.
> > > >
> > > >Pros: Finer grain control
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:20:55PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
> >
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:20:57PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
> >
16 matches
Mail list logo