How to refresh iscsi partition list in all clients?

2009-07-24 Thread Gonçalo Borges
Hi All... Here goes a very simple question... I have 12 clients, each one with several active iscsi sessions in different targets. In one of those clients, I have made a new partition in a given device. The problem is that that new partition doesn't appear for all the other clients, even

Re: Open iSCSI Performance on IBM

2009-04-14 Thread Gonçalo Borges
numbers from any other systems. On Apr 13, 7:00 pm, jnantel nan...@hotmail.com wrote: Have you made any headway with this issue? I'm having a write issue that seems to share some similarities with yours. On Apr 13, 8:14 am, Gonçalo Borges borges.gonc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi... Is /apoio04/b1

Re: Open iSCSI Performance on IBM

2009-04-13 Thread Gonçalo Borges
Hi... Is /apoio04/b1 a scsi/iscsi disk or is it LVM/DM/RAID on top of a iscsi/scsi disk? /apoio04/ is a RAID1 of two disks accessible via iscsi (in the following tests, I changed the mount point from /apoio04/ to /iscsi04- lun0/ but they are exactly the same). Could you set the IO

Open iSCSI Performance on IBM

2009-04-09 Thread Gonçalo Borges
Hi All... Sorry, the following could be a little bit off topic... Does any one has an idea of what is the expected performance for a IBM DS 3300 system connected via open iSCSI? Using a RAID 1 with 2 disks, I got the following numbers: Sequential Write: [r...@core12 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero

Re: Open iSCSI Performance on IBM

2009-04-09 Thread Gonçalo Borges
What is the write performance if you do RAID0 instead of RAID1? Basically 30MB/s, i.e., twice the value I get in a RAID1. Also, you can use 'direct' I/O flag with dd command. I'll try using this one! Thanks and cheers Goncalo --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You

Re: Open iSCSI Performance on IBM

2009-04-09 Thread Gonçalo Borges
Basically, I want to have an idea of the performance other admins are getting... The hardware is not so important since I'm interested in the order of magnitude of the performance rates... On Apr 9, 10:22 am, Gonçalo Borges borges.gonc...@gmail.com wrote: What is the write performance if you

Re: Kernel / iscsi problem under high load

2009-04-03 Thread Gonçalo Borges
Hi... [r...@core26 ~]# multipath -ll sda: checker msg is rdac checker reports path is down iscsi06-apoio1 (3600a0b80003ad1e50f2e49ae6d3e) dm-0 IBM,VirtualDisk [size=2.7T][features=1 queue_if_no_path][hwhandler=0] Very interesting: Out SAN system allows only 2048 GB of storage per

Re: Kernel / iscsi problem under high load

2009-04-02 Thread Gonçalo Borges
Hi... First of all, thanks for the reply. After recovering my system, I tried to perform the tests you ask for It might be good to know what scsiinfo (or similar) says about the size of the LUN at the start of yout tests. Likewise, show what fdisk -l tells about the partitions, and

Re: Kernel / iscsi problem under high load

2009-04-02 Thread Gonçalo Borges
Apr 1 11:44:13 core26 kernel: 122 [RAIDarray.mpp]iscsi06:1:0:1 Controller IO time expired. Delta 43701 secs Apr 1 11:44:13 core26 kernel: 497 [RAIDarray.mpp]iscsi06:1:0:1 Failed controller to 0. retry. vcmnd SN 458970 pdev H6:C0:T0:L1 0x00/0x00/0x00 0x0002 mpp_status:2 What is

Re: Kernel / iscsi problem under high load

2009-04-02 Thread Gonçalo Borges
Where did you get this kernel? Is it from xen or from Red Hat? If it is from Red Hat? I have not seen some of the error messages in your log in the upstream or RHEL code. This is a xen kernel but distributed in the Scientific Linux official releases. Check, for example: