On 12 Mar 2009 at 12:39, Mike Christie wrote:
>
> Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a simple question: What user name does open-iscsi use if I only
> > uncomment
> > (and set) the password, but not the user (That seems to be allowed)? Is it
> > the
> > initiator name then?
> >
Thanks Mike,
> For this RHEL 5.2 setup, does it make a difference if you do not use
> ifaces and setup the box like in 5.3 below?
I have used bonded ifaces so that the I/O requests can be split across
multiple NICS (both Server-side and on the Datacore San Melody SM node
NICS). This split is ach
UPDATE: RHEL 5.3 Host with NO disk i/o to SAN volume has encountered
errors;
Mar 13 10:38:49 PETDBLINUX01 kernel: connection1:0: iscsi: detected
conn error (1011)
Mar 13 10:38:49 PETDBLINUX01 iscsid: Kernel reported iSCSI connection
1:0 error (1011) state (3)
Mar 13 10:38:52 PETDBLINUX01 iscsid
UPDATE: RHEL 5.3 Host is showing errors. No Disk I/O to SAN volume
(last I/O Thursday 12th March);
Mar 13 10:38:49 MYHOST53 kernel: connection1:0: iscsi: detected conn
error (1011)
Mar 13 10:38:49 MYHOST53 iscsid: Kernel reported iSCSI connection 1:0
error (1011) state (3)
Mar 13 10:38:52 MYHOS
hi all,
Which iSNS server would you recommend with regards to QoS and ease of
usability.
cheers,
Nikhil
\|||/
(o o)
ooO-(_)-Ooo
Nikhil Talpallikar
--talli ;)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscr
bigcatxjs wrote:
> UPDATE: RHEL 5.3 Host is showing errors. No Disk I/O to SAN volume
> (last I/O Thursday 12th March);
>
Is there anything in the log before this? Something about a ping or nop
timing out?
> Mar 13 10:38:49 MYHOST53 kernel: connection1:0: iscsi: detected conn
> error (1011)
bigcatxjs wrote:
>> At these times is there lots of disk IO? Is there anything in the target
>> logs?
> It is fair to say that all these volumes take a heavy hit, in terms of
> I/O. Each host (excluding the RHEL 5.3. test host) run two Oracle
> databases, of which some have intra-database replica
