On 2011年08月19日 01:03, Mike Christie wrote:
heck NULL pointer first before reference its member, and check the
limit on the data buffer in function
str_remove_initial.
Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui shh...@gmail.com
---
usr/strings.c | 13 +
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4
On 2011年08月18日 04:38, Mike Christie wrote:
Did you actually hit this or just find it by searching the code?
I found it while I'm reading its source code.
Do I need to regenerate the patch?
On 08/15/2011 07:37 PM, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:
diff --git a/usr/strings.c b/usr/strings.c
index
On 2011年08月18日 10:03, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:
On 2011年08月18日 04:38, Mike Christie wrote:
Did you actually hit this or just find it by searching the code?
I found it while I'm reading its source code.
Do I need to regenerate the patch?
On 08/15/2011 07:37 PM, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:
diff
heck NULL pointer first before reference its member, and check the
limit on the data buffer in function
str_remove_initial.
Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui shh...@gmail.com
---
usr/strings.c | 13 +
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/usr/strings.c
Did you actually hit this or just find it by searching the code?
On 08/15/2011 07:37 PM, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:
diff --git a/usr/strings.c b/usr/strings.c
index ee6a51c..6432c2c 100644
--- a/usr/strings.c
+++ b/usr/strings.c
@@ -97,11 +97,16 @@ int str_enlarge_data(struct str_buffer *s, int
We should check NULL pointer first before reference its
member, and check the limit on the data buffer in function
str_remove_initial.
Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui shh...@gmail.com
---
usr/strings.c | 13 +
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git
