kas.chaudh...@qlogic.com>>, Manish
Rangankar mailto:manish.rangan...@qlogic.com>>
Subject: Re: RFC: Doc: FLASH DDB Management using iscsiadm
On Oct 11, 2012, at 6:26 AM,
lalit.chandiv...@qlogic.com<mailto:lalit.chandiv...@qlogic.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 8:05:
> >> From: Mike Christie [mailto:mich...@cs.wisc.edu]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 10:25 PM
> >> To: open-...@googlegroups.com
> >> Cc: Lalit Chandivade; Ravi Anand; Vikas Chaudhary; Manish Rangankar
> >> Subject: Re: RFC: Doc: FLASH DDB
t; >> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 10:25 PM
> >> To: open-...@googlegroups.com
> >> Cc: Lalit Chandivade; Ravi Anand; Vikas Chaudhary; Manish Rangankar
> >> Subject: Re: RFC: Doc: FLASH DDB Management using iscsiadm
> >>
> >> On 08/06/2
d; Vikas Chaudhary; Manish Rangankar
>> Subject: Re: RFC: Doc: FLASH DDB Management using iscsiadm
>>
>> On 08/06/2012 06:27 AM, Lalit Chandivade wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Mike Christie [mailto:micha...@cs.wi
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Christie [mailto:micha...@cs.wisc.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 10:25 PM
> To: open-iscsi@googlegroups.com
> Cc: Lalit Chandivade; Ravi Anand; Vikas Chaudhary; Manish Rangankar
> Subject: Re: RFC: Doc: FLASH DDB Management usi
hary; Manish
>> Rangankar
>> Subject: Re: RFC: Doc: FLASH DDB Management using iscsiadm
>>
>> On 07/12/2012 05:37 PM, Lalit Chandivade wrote:
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> We want to work on this solution that would enable qla4xxx users to
>> mana
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Christie [mailto:micha...@cs.wisc.edu]
> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 2:03 PM
> To: Lalit Chandivade
> Cc: open-iscsi@googlegroups.com; Ravi Anand; Vikas Chaudhary; Manish
> Rangankar
> Subject: Re: RFC: Doc: FLASH DDB Management
On 07/12/2012 05:37 PM, Lalit Chandivade wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> We want to work on this solution that would enable qla4xxx users to manage
> the DDBs in FLASH and migrate the entries from FLASH to user space.
>
> Here is our initial thought, please review and let us know your feedback.
>
This so