On 5/20/07, Eddie O'Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 -- assuming the code is ready to go, I agree that it's a good
idea to go straight to 1.0.
+1 as well to waiting until the TLP infrastructure is complete,
which could take a week or more to unbrand from the Incubator, move
the website
On 4/30/07, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm happy to announce that OpenJPA 0.9.7 passes the JPA TCK! I'd like to
thank Marc Prud'hommeaux in particular, who made this happen in all
aspects: he worked with Sun to get access to the TCK, set up the
infrastructure to be able to run
On 4/25/07, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
Is anyone else going to be at ApacheCon next week? Marc Prud'hommeaux
and I will both be there.
cool :-)
i'm there from saturday to saturday (see
http://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/WhoArrivesWhen for more arrival
times)
if any
On 4/3/07, Michael Dick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All too easy, thank you both!
I just added the files. Release-notes and Changes came mostly from JIRA.
release notes are surprisingly important for open source projects.
downloads are often the first point of contact for potential users,
On 4/4/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you look at the exception that is thrown from the database, it's a
pretty general exception.
The statement was aborted because it would have caused a duplicate
key value in a unique or primary key constraint or unique index
identified by
On 3/26/07, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the links. I skimmed through them and put together
http://wiki.apache.org/general/SummerOfCode2007#openjpa-streaming-lobs.
Could someone in the know take a look at that and let me know if it
looks right?
looks ok to me but more
)
On Feb 13, 2007, at 8:10 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 2/12/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, the problem is that it's not publicly visible. I need to solve
that...
http://www.apache.org/jcp names some lists
i could add some links to that page from the dev and incubator
On 2/9/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 8, 2007, at 3:32 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
It's there for debugging purposes. We could probably check for
TRACE-level logging; if not enabled, the exception would not be
created
and the assertion would include a localized string
On 1/2/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, I like to put both the data cleanup and data
initialization in the setUp() stage. It's sometimes a bit slower, but
if there is faulty cleanup logic in a previous test's tearDown(), it
may affect some random test down the road,
On 1/2/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For What It's Worth:
+1 on the drop-tables feature for OpenJPA. But I would caution
against using it on each test.
Sadly, my experience is that drop-create-tables is 99.9% of the time
taken in a typical test.
The JDO TCK runs hundreds of
On 11/1/06, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alternately, we could always just start fresh and act as if
it were
a new project, in which case, we wouldn't have to migrate over the
release notes.
Starting fresh is fine by me; I just had a couple tweaks and fixes that
I wanted to add
On 10/19/06, Marc Prud'hommeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eddie-
snip
- Is there an SVN tag for this?
No, although the SVN revision number is contained in the release
(FTR, it can be seen by running: java
org.apache.openjpa.conf.OpenJPAVersion).
Is there a policy on SVN tag names for
On 10/7/06, Marc Prud'hommeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My personal understanding is that 0.9.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT is
building towards 0.9.0-incubating, so I think your first scenario is
correct.
+1
It would be good if an Apache expect would confirm this, though.
incubator-pmc-hat
On 8/5/06, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Some questions about version numbers:
1. Is it true that we should keep the OpenJPA version number below 1.0
until we get out of incubation?
projects under incubation are not allowed to create official apache
releases. the version
On 8/5/06, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
OpenJPA's default logging implementation has a concept of a diagnostic
context, roughly stolen from log4j. The basic idea is that in a
configuration file, the user can specify a diagnostic context string
that will be printed out with each
On 7/25/06, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
Does apache have any infrastructure / conventions in place for staging
changes to the site to look them over / collaborate / etc. before
pushing them to the site?
web pages are staged at people.apache.org before being rsync'd to
16 matches
Mail list logo
