> Generally in favor of including this performance patch with the
> release. Just a few questions:
>
> 1. How good is the patch? Has it been put through whatever
> extensive Unit Tests tests anyone has?
As others have said, it does pass the OpenJPA test suite, but
unfortunately that isn't sa
t; > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 2:32 PM
> > To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: OPENJPA-134 and the 0.9.7 release
> >
> > Generally in favor of including this performance patch with the
>
Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 2:32 PM
> To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: OPENJPA-134 and the 0.9.7 release
>
> Generally in favor of including this performance patch with the
> release. Just a
OTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 2:32 PM
> To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: OPENJPA-134 and the 0.9.7 release
>
> Generally in favor of including this performance patch with the
> release. Just a few questions:
>
> 1
Generally in favor of including this performance patch with the
release. Just a few questions:
1. How good is the patch? Has it been put through whatever extensive
Unit Tests tests anyone has?
2. How easy is it to respin the release? I'd hope that this is a
matter of a few hours but I'm n
Question...
Now that Abe has graciously resolved OpenJPA-134 (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-134), I would really like to
see this get included into the 0.9.7 release. This fix looks to resolve the
redundant sql joins that were dogging the performance of certain
benchmarks. By i
