Not exactly, the open64 tree was started with Intel ORC effort based
on the open sourced SGI compiler. Pathscale source was merged in later
on. The site has always reside in U of Delaware, and that was also
start by Intel Research where Roy Ju and myself was in charge of that
project.
Sun
2011/5/2
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Goswin von Brederlow
wrote:
> C Bergström writes:
>
>> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:05 AM, David Coakley wrote:
>>> Hi Goswin,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your interest in Open64. These are both known problems
>>> with the build system.
>>>
>>> I filed two bugs in the Open
C Bergström writes:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:05 AM, David Coakley wrote:
>> Hi Goswin,
>>
>> Thanks for your interest in Open64. These are both known problems
>> with the build system.
>>
>> I filed two bugs in the Open64 Bugzilla database (bugs.open64.net):
>>
>> 779 : build in source direc
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:05 AM, David Coakley wrote:
> Hi Goswin,
>
> Thanks for your interest in Open64. These are both known problems
> with the build system.
>
> I filed two bugs in the Open64 Bugzilla database (bugs.open64.net):
>
> 779 : build in source directory does not work
> 780 : "make
Hi Goswin,
Thanks for your interest in Open64. These are both known problems
with the build system.
I filed two bugs in the Open64 Bugzilla database (bugs.open64.net):
779 : build in source directory does not work
780 : "make install" does not support DESTDIR
In addition, I think the installed
Hi,
I'm trying to build a debian package for open64 4.2.5-1 downloaded from
amd with little success.
First I tried building the source in-tree which screws up paths and
fails to find libs for linking and the xgcc. If in-tree building isn't
supported then the configure should refuse to run in-tree
