On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:27:33 +
Jakub Moscicki wrote:
> I am not sure, but if the uniquifier is just to uniquify the
> potentialy reused vnode id, then the risk of collisions is really low
> even without this check, right? One would have to have the uniquifier
> wrapped around 32bits in betwee
Hello,
Sorry for late reply - at this side of the pond we are off at home by now ;-)
Yes, the issue seems to be the overflowing 32bit uniquifier counter which we
suspected and which was later confirmed by Derrick.
In any case for now I took out the "check for less then the max" to restore
acce
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 14:27:12 -0400
Derrick Brashear wrote:
> > contents for caching purposes anyway. In option (2) you can have a
> > collision by just removing a file and creating one. Maybe those
> > aren't _so_ different, but that's my impression.
>
> It's pretty easy to avoid the condition y
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Andrew Deason wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:34:18 -0400
> Derrick Brashear wrote:
>
> > The problem he's having (apparently I replied without replying all) is
> > he's wrapping uniquifiers, and currently the volume package deals
> > poorly, since ~1300 from maxu
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:34:18 -0400
Derrick Brashear wrote:
> The problem he's having (apparently I replied without replying all) is
> he's wrapping uniquifiers, and currently the volume package deals
> poorly, since ~1300 from maxuint plus 2000 plus 1 results in a number
> "less than the max uniq
The problem he's having (apparently I replied without replying all) is he's
wrapping uniquifiers, and
currently the volume package deals poorly, since ~1300 from maxuint plus
2000 plus 1 results in a number "less than the max uniquifier"
We need to decide whether OpenAFS should
1) compact the uniq
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 10:57:13 +
Jakub Moscicki wrote:
> The salvage subsequently says that it fixed it but in reality nothing
> changes. Here is the salvage output:
"nothing changes" as in, the volinfo output doesn't change at all? Or
it's just that the problem doesn't go away?
> ==
> >>
