Re: [Openais] kernel watchdog timer for corosync

On 5/25/2010 at 10:06 AM, Alan Jones wrote: > Is there any interest in a kernel watchdog timer for corosync and, if so, > where should it be petted? > I did a simple test of killing the corosync 1.2.1 daemon in a pacemaker > configuration with shared storage. > Sure enough, the node is declar

Re: [Openais] Pb with last corosync releases available for RHEL5 ...

25.05.2010 02:01, Steven Dake wrote: > On 05/24/2010 02:51 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Sorry for being out of "References", just subscribed. >> >> >>> On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 16:19 +0200, Alain.Moulle wrote: >>> Hi These new releases of corosync do not start

Re: [Openais] kernel watchdog timer for corosync

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 05:06:12PM -0700, Alan Jones wrote: > Is there any interest in a kernel watchdog timer for corosync and, if so, > where should it be petted? > I did a simple test of killing the corosync 1.2.1 daemon in a pacemaker > configuration with shared storage. > Sure enough, the node

[Openais] kernel watchdog timer for corosync

Is there any interest in a kernel watchdog timer for corosync and, if so, where should it be petted? I did a simple test of killing the corosync 1.2.1 daemon in a pacemaker configuration with shared storage. Sure enough, the node is declared offline which presents a potential for corruption. I know

Re: [Openais] Pb with last corosync releases available for RHEL5 ...

On 05/24/2010 02:51 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > Hi all, > > Sorry for being out of "References", just subscribed. > > >> On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 16:19 +0200, Alain.Moulle wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> These new releases of corosync do not start successfully on RHEL5 : >>> corosync-1.2.2-1.1.

Re: [Openais] Pb with last corosync releases available for RHEL5 ...

Hi all, Sorry for being out of "References", just subscribed. > On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 16:19 +0200, Alain.Moulle wrote: >> Hi >> >> These new releases of corosync do not start successfully on RHEL5 : >> corosync-1.2.2-1.1.el5 >> corosynclib-1.2.2-1.1.el5 >> I 've joined the messages trace. >> >>

Re: [Openais] OpenAIS, Corosync and Pacemaker relationship

Yes it does, thank you Ryan. So it is correct to say that I am using corosync as the communications layer between drbd and pacemaker? Then I can use an openais plugin with corosync if I need to? ~Dean. On May 24, 2010, at 2:30 PM, Ryan O'Hara wrote: > On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 10:44:37PM -0700

Re: [Openais] OpenAIS, Corosync and Pacemaker relationship

On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 10:44:37PM -0700, Dean Patterson wrote: > Hello Digimer, > > >From what I gathered, corosync is a subset of openais meant for > >situations that do not require the full openais standard. They are > >the communications layer for pacemaker. I am using drbd so > >corosync is

Re: [Openais] corosync IPC manager v/s coroipc hiperf IPC system

On 05/24/2010 11:43 AM, Sampathkumar, Kishore wrote: In Wikipedia, the entries for corosync mention: . . . The coroipc high performance shared memory IPC system . . . The "Corosync Cluster Engine" paper in Proceedings of Linux Symposium (Jul 23-2

[Openais] corosync IPC manager v/s coroipc hiperf IPC system

In Wikipedia, the entries for corosync mention: . . . The coroipc high performance shared memory IPC system . . . The "Corosync Cluster Engine" paper in Proceedings of Linux Symposium (Jul 23-26 2008) talks about Interprocess Communication Manager. Are

[Openais] [openais whitetank] - Fix for RHBZ#579081

Attached is patch solving $SUBJ bug intended for Z-stream. I will work on real solution based on Posix semaphores for 5.6. Regards, Honza commit 58c2676fcedda5df61df07735434c13fb5975cc8 Author: Jan Friesse Date: Mon May 24 15:33:59 2010 +0200 Support for semtimedop on Linux This