* Correct 'See Also' reference to corosync.conf(5) in corosync(8) man page
* Update path to default config (now /etc/corosync/corosync.conf)
Signed-off-by: Zane Bitter
---
man/corosync.8 |2 +-
man/corosync.conf.5 |4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 2011/03/02, at 12:50, Steven Dake wrote:
> On 03/01/2011 05:50 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
>> Once more, to the list this time. It seems the Reply-To header is now
>> missing again.
>>
>> On 2011/03/01, at 12:48, Steven Dake wrote:
>>
>>> One more note totemsrp.c also uses free on these frames (
This change paves the way for eliminating a copy within the Infiniband
driver in the future by transferring responsibility for allocating and
freeing message buffers to the network driver layer.
Tested under valgrind on a single-node cluster.
Signed-off-by: Zane Bitter
---
exec/totemiba.c |
yes /etc/init.d/pacemaker stop runs first.
- Original Message
From: Vladislav Bogdanov
To: openais@lists.linux-foundation.org
Sent: Wed, 9 March, 2011 2:03:23
Subject: Re: [Openais] firewire
08.03.2011 23:40, ray klassen wrote:
> one other thing. in this configuration, corosync has t
08.03.2011 23:40, ray klassen wrote:
> one other thing. in this configuration, corosync has to be shot in the head
> itself to stop. /etc/init.d/corosync stop results in something like
> "Waiting for corosync services to stop" and lines and lines of dots. Kill -9
> is
> the only way, it seems.
Ray,
The results look like corosync is working properly and forming a
configuration. I think we need more data, but I am not sure what data
to ask for (its about 1 am here and bed time).
I hope to return to this email in the morning.
Thanks
-steve
On 03/08/2011 09:36 PM, ray klassen wrote:
> A
On 03/09/2011 01:14 AM, JiaQiang Xu wrote:
> 2011/2/25 Steven Dake :
>> On 02/25/2011 01:48 AM, JiaQiang Xu wrote:
>>> 2011/2/24 Steven Dake :
redundant ring is completely untested with udpu. I would focus on
getting udpu working first and go from there.
passive offers better p
2011/2/25 Steven Dake :
> On 02/25/2011 01:48 AM, JiaQiang Xu wrote:
>> 2011/2/24 Steven Dake :
>>> redundant ring is completely untested with udpu. I would focus on
>>> getting udpu working first and go from there.
>>>
>>> passive offers better performance, active consumes more cpu with
>>> sligh
Not enough information.
Create and attach a hb_report for the shutdown case.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Beau Sapach wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I’ve got a 2-node cluster that exposes iSCSI targets backed by LVM volumes
> on top of a DRBD device. For the most part I’ve got everything workin
