Re: [Open Babel] OpenBabel-discuss Digest, Vol 160, Issue 16

2019-11-27 Thread Geoffrey Hutchison
> I have a related bug. Just downloaded OpenBabel-3.0.0-x86.exe from GitHub but > it was generating corrdinates with too many digits. Excerpt from PDBQT file > overflowing the coords mask: I'd suggest filing a bug with an example file. I'm not entirely sure what to do because the problem isn't

Re: [Open Babel] OpenBabel-discuss Digest, Vol 160, Issue 16

2019-11-27 Thread Pedro Lacerda
Hi, I have a related bug. Just downloaded OpenBabel-3.0.0-x86.exe from GitHub but it was generating corrdinates with too many digits. Excerpt from PDBQT file overflowing the coords mask: ATOM 1 N UNL 12261608.7291334600.251 0.000 0.00 0.00 > +0.000 NA > The command line

Re: [Open Babel] OpenBabel-discuss Digest, Vol 160, Issue 16

2019-09-21 Thread Dimitri Maziuk via OpenBabel-discuss
On 9/21/2019 11:28 AM, Geoffrey Hutchison wrote: On the other hand, not every file format supports arbitrary precision (e.g., 8 decimals or more) - there's not much that babel can do about that, except by suggesting other formats with better suitability. OTGH I've seen lots of numbers

Re: [Open Babel] OpenBabel-discuss Digest, Vol 160, Issue 16

2019-09-21 Thread Geoffrey Hutchison
Indeed small differences in XYZ coordinates, distances, etc. are not meaningful, although certainly a structure can shift slightly from a true optimum (all gradients are essentially zero) with rounding. On the other hand, not every file format supports arbitrary precision (e.g., 8 decimals or

Re: [Open Babel] OpenBabel-discuss Digest, Vol 160, Issue 16

2019-09-21 Thread Vaibhav Dixit
A comment: on the decimal place in the mol2 file format. I have had experience with reviewers questioning the interpretation of coordinates beyond 2nd-decimal. Their argument was that coordinates from x-ray data are known with certainty up to only the 2nd decimal place in Angstrom units. Thus any