Re: ip.access nano 3.5G : Any advice on how to configure channel and power?

2017-08-09 Thread Harald Welte
Hi Alan,

I think unless you've moved to the US, the 850+1900 MHz bands should not
have any macro network carriers.  However, there are of course possibly
other users in that spectrum that create a high interference level for your
signal.

If you have a spectrum analyzer around, you can check the signal levels
and check which UARFCN might me most suitable.  Make sure to cover both
the uplink and the downlink part of the UARFCN.

Aside from interference, it could also be that there is simply insufficient
output power configured.  There are a number of related DMI MIB entries,
I don't recall the details right now, but the following values appear to
be related to RF power

cpichTxPowerLowerLimit (2594) = -100
cpichTxPowerUpperLimit (2595) = 500
eAgchPowerOffset (3494) = -20
eDpcchToDpcchPowerOffset (3492) = 4
eHichErgchPowerOffset (3495) = -64
cpichTxPower_001 (2531) = -9
hsScchPowerOffset (2875) = -10
maximumPowerCapability (1863) = 130
maximumTotalWidebandTransmitPower (2593) = 0
minimumPowerCapability (2044) = 0
powerHeadroom (2567) = 8
primaryCpichPowerPercent_002 (3606) = 100
maximumAllowedUlTxPowerDch (2216) = 24
dlPowerControlPerRab_001 (3486) = ({SRB_AND_DL_RAB_TYPE_3_4_SRB (1), -30, -20}, 
{SRB_AND_DL_RAB_TYPE_13_6_SRB (2), -30, -20}, {SRB_AND_DL_RAB_TYPE_CS_AMR_12_2 
(3), 50, -20}, {SRB_AND_DL_RAB_TYPE_CS_UNKNOWN_DL64 (4), 0, -27}, 
{SRB_AND_DL_RAB_TYPE_PS_IB_DL64 (5), -30, -20}, 
{SRB_AND_DL_RAB_TYPE_PS_IB_DL128 (6), 0, -20}, {SRB_AND_DL_RAB_TYPE_PS_IB_DL384 
(7), 40, -20}, {SRB_AND_DL_RAB_TYPE_PS_IB_DL32 (8), -40, -13})
ulPowerCtrlPerRab_001 (3487) = ({SRB_AND_UL_RAB_TYPE_3_4_SRB (1), -20, 1, 2, 1, 
1, 30, 80, 0, 4, 2}, {SRB_AND_UL_RAB_TYPE_13_6_SRB (2), -20, 1, 2, 1, 1, 30, 
80, 0, 4, 2}, {SRB_AND_UL_RAB_TYPE_CS_AMR_12_2 (3), -27, 1, 3, 0, 1, 40, 80, 
30, 6, 1}, {SRB_AND_UL_RAB_TYPE_CS_UNKNOWN_UL64 (4), -27, 1, 6, 0, -1, 70, 90, 
50, 4, 2}, {SRB_AND_UL_RAB_TYPE_PS_IB_UL64 (5), -20, 1, 6, 1, 1, 70, 90, 10, 4, 
2}, {SRB_AND_UL_RAB_TYPE_PS_IB_UL128 (6), -20, 1, 6, 1, 1, 60, 80, 0, 4, 2}, 
{SRB_AND_UL_RAB_TYPE_PS_IB_UL384 (7), -20, 1, 6, 1, 1, 100, 120, 100, 4, 2}, 
{SRB_AND_UL_RAB_TYPE_PS_IB_ULHS (8), -10, 1, 10, 0, 1, 40, 150, 30, 2, 1}, 
{SRB_AND_UL_RAB_TYPE_PS_IB_UL32 (9), -20, 1, 6, 1, 1, 50, 50, 0, 4, 2})
powerOffsetPpm (3602) = 2
rfMeanWidebandPower (1784) = 0.00
aichPowerOffset (1264) = -5
bchPowerOffset (1295) = -20
fachPowerOffset (1342) = 20
pchPowerOffset (1482) = 20
pichPowerOffset (1491) = -5
primarySchPowerOffset (1502) = -50
sccpchTfciBitsPowerOffset (1603) = 12
secondarySchPowerOffset (1606) = -50

However, I guess it really only makes sense to start to play with those
values when attached to a transmitter tester that can actually observe
how the channel power changes.  If anyone has played with this so far,
now would be a good time to step forward :)

Another possible source of confusion could be that the phones have some
kind of logic that they don't scan on US frequency bands in case they
see macro cells on non-US bands.  This is pure hypothesis at this point.

-- 
- Harald Weltehttp://laforge.gnumonks.org/

"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)


ip.access nano 3.5G : Any advice on how to configure channel and power?

2017-08-09 Thread Alan Evans

Hello devs,

I am using a 3.5G nano starter kit and I have a problem, hopefully 
someone can give me some advice.


When I use the kit in a location with very little 3G coverage it works 
great, I scan for 3G networks, the phone sees a network '90170' and can 
register without any problems.
However if I try the same thing in a location that has very good macro 
3G coverage from several network operators, the phone can longer see my 
nano cell.


I assume the problem is due to frequency reuse and the nanocell is using 
the same UARFCN as one of the macro cells.


Does anyone have any advice on how best to find a clear frequency band 
to use?
Also does anyone know if I have to reboot the ip.access after changing 
the UARFCN using


set rfParamsCandidateList=({9800, 401, 1})


Regards
--
Alan R Evans
KAGE Design Services Ltd
Tel: +44 7891 773415


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus