Oliver Welter wrote:
Hi,
i may be able to test against a pix, but can't promise, since i'm not
working there anymore, but i have still good contacts so it may be
possible but i don't have access to any cisco-router equipment for
testing those ios systems
I think I can organize an old Cisco
Hi,
i may be able to test against a pix, but can't promise, since i'm not
working there anymore, but i have still good contacts so it may be
possible but i don't have access to any cisco-router equipment for
testing those ios systems
I think I can organize an old Cisco 2600 Series here and set
Hi,
> btw: is it possible to see/get those sscep improvements already somewhere?
yes, on CVS head, src/common/lib/cmds/scepPKIOperation
> i think u may talking about the batch processor ;)
> there we have/had some havy requirements of high amount issuing of certs
> and speedproblems when it come
Martin Bartosch wrote:
OK, so I'll improve the script to a point where the default configuration
results in exactly the same behaviour as the previous version.
btw: is it possible to see/get those sscep improvements already somewhere?
Yeah, I meant you. In a former discussion you were concern
Hi,
> I see no problems to include both scripts and activate the new one if it
> behaves like the old one.
OK, so I'll improve the script to a point where the default configuration
results in exactly the same behaviour as the previous version.
>> I guess practically, but I haven't performed benc
Martin Bartosch wrote:
umm, yes, if it is configured to work so, it will work just like
the old script.
BTW: an older version of this script has been in test (preproduction)
use in my environment for some months now, but we currently do not
experience high load on the SCEP interface.
I see no
Hi,
> so if I see this correctly the new scep script adds new functionality
> AND does everything it has done before - meens it is a drop in
> replacement for the old script ?
umm, yes, if it is configured to work so, it will work just like
the old script.
BTW: an older version of this script has
Hi,
so if I see this correctly the new scep script adds new functionality
AND does everything it has done before - meens it is a drop in
replacement for the old script ?
Martin, you said it is "slower" - acedemic slower or practical slower :)
If I assume right - my Opinion: make the new scep
Hi,
> I started a small discussion with Oli about our branch management but it
> is perhaps no good idea to make it more complicated. The idea was to
> introduce feature and minor release branches on the 0.9.2 branch. The
> problem is that this is perhaps to complicated for the most people.
>
> We
Hi,
>> The "automatic approval" mode implements a method for request approval
>> defined in later versions of the SCEP draft. Use this mode only if
>> you have met the prerequisites:
>>
>> - CVS head versions of OpenCA::OpenSSL and OpenCA::PKCS7 (will be
>> included in 0.9.2.3)
>
> Do you mean w
Hi Martin,
Martin Bartosch wrote:
As SCEP is imho one of the most requested features in the near past, I
think we should put it in head and perhaps even into branch, perhaps
with a config switch to give the user the choice...
I decided to check it in in order to allow others to have a look at
11 matches
Mail list logo
