Re: [opencog-dev] Re: Message to Any Future AI

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 5:18 PM, supahacka wrote: > p.s.: here are some contemporary bestselling books on the subject (Tolle > sold like what ... 100 million copies?) ... lets burn all copies before AGI > gets a chance to read them so we can pretend that AI will evolve in a >

Re: [opencog-dev] Openness of knowledge-base of Hanson robotics

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Nil Geisweiller <ngeis...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 10/31/2017 02:52 AM, Mark Nuzz wrote: >> >> I am involved - I have taken time to respond to questions by a number >> of new posters to the group, to the best of my ability, in good f

Re: [opencog-dev] Openness of knowledge-base of Hanson robotics

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Linas Vepstas wrote: > Hi Mark, > > > The answer is "yes", but perhaps not the way you are expecting it. Its not > like we have some defined format for "semantic triples" or whatever. There > are a large number of rich data representation

Re: [opencog-dev] Openness of knowledge-base of Hanson robotics

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Linas Vepstas wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > Let me top-post answers to your questions. First, one needs to clarify: > "what is a knowledgebase?" There are multiple components that can be called > "a knowledgebase", and they are all quite very

Re: [opencog-dev] Contributing to Opencog

On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 1:37 AM, Ben Goertzel wrote: > *** > OTOH, If modules or projects were usable in isolation, and the > dependencies could be effectively treated as black boxes (as most > software dependencies are), or even simulated/mocked, and if > meaningful

Re: [opencog-dev] Contributing to Opencog

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Linas Vepstas wrote: > People seem not to read the tutorials... maybe because they don't see the > point of doing so? > Do you think my theory is plausible? Tutorials on a large system must be greater in scope, and are therefore more likely

Re: [opencog-dev] Contributing to Opencog

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:13 AM, Ben Goertzel wrote: > I regret that OpenCog remains so hard to approach. In large part it > has evolved this way because the vast bulk of funding that has gone > into OpenCog has been oriented toward paying a small group of people > to work, in

Re: [opencog-dev] Contributing to Opencog

Ivan, This is essentially the vision I have for the project too. I wish I could say that it could be done by a determined volunteer, but the logistics are very difficult for pulling this off. It would require multiple experienced and skilled engineers working full-time, possibly paid. That isn't

Re: [opencog-dev] Contributing to Opencog

On Oct 1, 2017 3:47 PM, "Anastasios Tsiolakidis" wrote: > > Well isn't OpenCog having a busy weekend :) As a lurker I have already expressed my dissatisfaction at "advanced C++" which is the trend in the project, and would probably carry over my disapproval of "idiomatic

Re: [opencog-dev] Contributing to Opencog

On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Ivan Vodišek wrote: > And is there a way to extract a documentation of the project in a way > Javadoc works? That option would be of great help if it would be used. Try building with "make doxygen" -- You received this message because you

Re: [opencog-dev] Contributing to Opencog

On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Ivan Vodišek wrote: > > The key property of collaboration system I'm proposing is a security system > where each author can give privileges to modify or to fork out their work. > This way I hope that the system could scale well towards a

Re: [opencog-dev] Contributing to Opencog

By the way, I lurked for 10 years before making my first real contribution. Don't blame the project for that one! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [opencog-dev] Contributing to Opencog

You bring up a good point. It is quite difficult to maintain. Not only is it a very complex system design, but the implementation is also quite complex, containing a lot of legacy code, unfinished features, experiments, and whatever else. I used to thumb my nose at the fact that not enough

Re: [opencog-dev] it would be nice if..

I've done some work on the build system a couple of years ago. I agree that the project suffers from a lot of legacy code in the build system. Unfortunately there aren't unlimited resources to fix it "The Right Way" with a big overhaul. But maybe it would be a good idea if someone were able to

Re: [opencog-dev] general agi discussion apart from opencog

I recommend: http://www.agiri.org/email/ On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Ed Pell wrote: > Hi, can anyone point me to any general discussions of AGI? Thanks. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "opencog" group. > To unsubscribe

[opencog-dev] OpenCog as a legal research tool

Has legal research been considered as an early use case for OpenCog? For example: * Finding out which legal defenses or strategies have been tried in a category of cases * Finding out the success and failure rate of given legal strategies * Estimating the reasoning that generally causes a

Re: [opencog-dev] goertzel.org seems not to be online?

Recovering from malware infections is among the toughest *and educational) jobs in IT. Your interns will thank you later in their careers for having such a great mentor :) On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Ben Goertzel wrote: > Yes, there is a malware problem on that server,