On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Linas Vepstas <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mark, > > > The answer is "yes", but perhaps not the way you are expecting it. Its not > like we have some defined format for "semantic triples" or whatever. There > are a large number of rich data representation styles that have been used in > a variety of projects. The commonalities in all of these are expressed as > "atomese". That is, the standard protocol is "atomese".
That's exactly the type of thing I had in mind, actually (hence serialization). Have you validated your assumption that the lack of interest in the downloading of knowledge-bases is due to "nearly-zero interest in knowledgebases", as you claim? Or is it possible that the atomese json files are not providing enough expected utility? What can one do with those files, currently? Can I simply drop them into a data directory and have them be automatically consumed by OpenCog, or is there a difficult process to get them to work? Is atomspace able to deduplicate imported atoms that are conceptually equivalent to atoms already in the database, but not exactly equal? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CAMyYmr_5hc0KXH03fmcFina5hur76M2t2K1xmUV4e%2BsFO%3DsSMg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
