> In the meanwhile, there is an effort is to create a scripting language that
> will allow non-programmer artists to create scripted actions and reactions.
> Unfortunately, this completely blows-off and ignores the concept of a
> "middle form", and so there is no path forward from scripting to a
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Adrian Borucki wrote:
> I can see your points, sometimes I forget how ambitious this project is...
> :)
> I suppose you want to make the software do what you want by communicating
> with it in a natural language and extend its capabilities on
Subject: Re: [opencog-dev] Java 8
No one is.
Here are example implementations for other scheme dialects
https://github.com/Calysto/calysto_scheme
https://github.com/joeltg/mit-scheme-kernel
Have a blast :-)
On Saturday, July 29, 2017 at 1:53:26 AM UTC+8, Adrian Borucki wrote:
On Friday
No one is.
Here are example implementations for other scheme dialects
https://github.com/Calysto/calysto_scheme
https://github.com/joeltg/mit-scheme-kernel
Have a blast :-)
On Saturday, July 29, 2017 at 1:53:26 AM UTC+8, Adrian Borucki wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, 28 July 2017 09:26:19 UTC+2,
I mean -- just making another scripting-language wrapper for Atomspace
and associated cognitive-process interactions doesn't really
accomplish anything, that's all...
Right now we have bindings in Scheme, pretty-thorough ones in python,
very partial ones in Haskell ... but pretty much only the
Hi Adrian. I think you missed my point.
The goal is to not write code at all, not in java, not in clojure, not in
scala, not in scheme, not in python and not in C++. The goal is to have the
machine write it's own code. The language that the machine writes in is
atomese.
Why atomese, and not
Using JVM stack has an advantage of being able to write code in Scala or
Clojure too. I guess Clojure would fit because Scheme is already being
used. It does have some differences though, so it wouldn't be a seamless
transition.
On Wednesday, 26 July 2017 23:01:08 UTC+2, linas wrote:
>
> The
Yes! I love it when people give definite answers.
So, just to check, the preferred language is Scheme?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Well but seriously... it depends on how and why...
We are open to anything if it's the best way to achieve some important
functionality...
But we don't want to introduce additional complexities lightly
We have Java in the codebase now, in the form of RelEx ... but we're
planning to eliminate
How does a world-class athlete and health-food nut feel about eating
a 100-pound barrel of sugar laced with chocolate, vegemite and
cyanide?
;-)
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Ed Pell wrote:
> How does the Opencog team feel about adding code in Java 8?
>
> --
> You
10 matches
Mail list logo