Re: [opencog-dev] How much longer?

2016-11-20 Thread Ben Goertzel
No major setbacks, no major jumps forward, just steady progress Our current goal is to have a humanoid robot with basic common-sensical sentience regarding itself and its environment within 3 years ... and a full human adult level AGI within 9 years According to my best judgment we are on

[opencog-dev] Re: [opencog/opencog] General cleanup of the embodiment doc. (#2488)

2016-11-20 Thread Apil Tamang
Hi All, Trying to read through the knowledge.scm file that is supposed to, in some ways, embody the internal-model for chatbot-eva. Naturally, I have some very basic questions. It'd be nice to understand what exactly the following nodes do or represent: - DefinedSchema, - Inheritance vs.

[opencog-dev] How much longer?

2016-11-20 Thread Gaurav Gautam
Hi, I was just wondering if there is any revisions to the estimate of the timeline to achieving General Intelligence. Any major setbacks or jump forwards? Yours sincerely Gaurav Gautam -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To

[opencog-dev] Link Parse to Logic via Lojban

2016-11-20 Thread Ben Goertzel
I added a lot more detail to the "Link parse to logic via Lojban" page ... http://wiki.opencog.org/w/Link_Parse_to_Logic_via_Lojban It's only moderately easy reading for those who aren't familiar with Lojban, because the Lojban will look weird. But once you get past that, it's pretty simple...

[opencog-dev] Re: Link Parse to Logic via Lojban

2016-11-20 Thread Ed Pell
I hope you guys are filing patents or public disclosure on EVERYTHING. Ed On Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 11:24:24 AM UTC-5, Ben Goertzel wrote: > > I added a lot more detail to the "Link parse to logic via Lojban" page ... > > http://wiki.opencog.org/w/Link_Parse_to_Logic_via_Lojban > >

Re: [opencog-dev] Trying to understand how solving TruthQuery works

2016-11-20 Thread Tareq Alkhaldi
Thanks Linas and Nil, Yeah, I'm looking forward to the documentation. I'm also looking forward to reaching the point when PLN can be applied to parsed sentences to solve parsed questions, because so far the examples I've seen only work on handmade facts in scheme. On Friday, 11 November 2016

Re: [opencog-dev] Trying to understand how solving TruthQuery works

2016-11-20 Thread Ben Goertzel
Tareq, I think it is months away, because first Nil needs to finish some technical stuff in the backward chainer, and THEN he has to make scalable inference control work for PLN via doing pattern mining on inference histories... the latter won't be easy and help with that would be valued if anyone

Re: [opencog-dev] Trying to understand how solving TruthQuery works

2016-11-20 Thread Tareq Alkhaldi
Hi Ben, On Monday, 21 November 2016 12:47:00 UTC+9, Ben Goertzel wrote: > > Tareq, I think it is months away, because first Nil needs to finish > some technical stuff in the backward chainer, and THEN he has to make > scalable inference control work for PLN via doing pattern mining on >

[opencog-dev] Re: [opencog/opencog] General cleanup of the embodiment doc. (#2488)

2016-11-20 Thread Ed Pell
Linas, wonderful step forward. It is so pleasing to see the small surgical team ahead of the massive corporate armies. Keep running the wolf packs will get organized eventually. The more you put in the public domain the less they can enclose and control. Ed On Sunday, November 20, 2016 at

Re: [opencog-dev] Re: Link Parse to Logic via Lojban

2016-11-20 Thread Ben Goertzel
No patents are being filed on this stuff, but it's pretty clearly being publicly disclosed on the Internet in our wiki site and our Github repo... I don't think anyone's gonna steal a wacky idea like this one ... nobody outside a small circle will have interest in it till after it's implemented