Some interesting representational issues have come up in the context
of Atomspace representation of pathways, which appear to have more
general implications…
It seems the semantics we want for a biological pathway is sort of
like “the pathway P is a set of relationships R1, R2, …, R20” in kinda
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:07 PM, 'Nil Geisweiller' via opencog <
opencog@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> On 07/21/2017 04:58 PM, neuropress...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Ah thanks for letting me know about those rules, one more thing about
>> this tho. Is there already a rule which let's opencog(chatbot)
On 07/21/2017 04:58 PM, neuropress...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah thanks for letting me know about those rules, one more thing about
this tho. Is there already a rule which let's opencog(chatbot) know that
any statement made by a person or other information source it is talking
to is what they think
Ah thanks for letting me know about those rules, one more thing about this
tho. Is there already a rule which let's opencog(chatbot) know that any
statement made by a person or other information source it is talking to is
what they think instead of basically storing it in the atomspace
That's a nice idea. Maybe before going too low level to NDK, what if u run
opencog on a PC or some internet accessible server and just connect to it.
I use to telnet to the cogserver from phone terminal emulator when I'm
bored. It's fun to scheme on phone.
On Thursday, July 20, 2017 at
