I have not looked too hard at these, but I would expect DV_PROPORTION
and DV_INTERVALDV_PROPORTION to be the most common types to use, or
else just two DV_QUANTIFIEDs in an archetype (the first one).
I think, as Grahame noted, it will come down to where the balance lies
between putting stuff
* prEN ISO 11238: Structures and Controlled Vocabularies for
Ingredients (substances)
* prEN ISO 11239: Structures and Controlled Vocabularies for
Pharmaceutical Dose Forms, Units of Presentation and Routes of
Administration
* prEN ISO 11240: Structures and Controlled
2:16 PM
To: For openEHR clinical discussions
Subject: Re: a model for medication strengths
* prEN ISO 11238: Structures and Controlled Vocabularies for
Ingredients (substances)
* prEN ISO 11239: Structures and Controlled Vocabularies for
Pharmaceutical Dose Forms, Units
prEN ISO 11238: Structures and Controlled Vocabularies for
Ingredients (substances) -
prEN ISO 11239: Structures and Controlled Vocabularies for
Pharmaceutical Dose Forms, Units of Presentation and Routes of
Administration
prEN ISO 11240: Structures and Controlled Vocabularies for Units of
, Medical Software Industry Association www.msia.com.au
Vice Chair, HL7 Australia
p: +61298186493
f: +61298181435
- Original Message -
From: Paul Miller
To: For openEHR clinical discussions
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 6:31 AM
Subject: {Disarmed} Re: a model for medication
Thank you all for your comments on this,
specific responses below
Diego:
I agree that UCUM might be a useful within
a model - however, I just don't think a single
PQ covers the scope of strengths that I am seeing in
use in Australian medications (they become a lot
more complex).
Karsten:
The dm+d medication model does contain these concepts and it was used as the
basis for constructing the
How much has been removed as part of the simplification I am unclear
Thanks Vince - this question arose because I was trying to do some
mappings into the AMT - the simplified version (as of
Hi Andrew,
I have not looked too hard at these, but I would expect DV_PROPORTION
and DV_INTERVALDV_PROPORTION to be the most common types to use, or
else just two DV_QUANTIFIEDs in an archetype (the first one).
- thomas beale
Andrew Patterson wrote:
I was wondering if anyone had any
I was wondering if anyone had any experience or knowledge of
a useable model for storing computable medication strengths
(and medications forms etc)?
Now I realise this is pretty complex - for instance these are
some of the medication strengths strings listed for some Australian
medications..
Why don't create a PQ object and assign to its units UCUM as
terminology name and the desired units to the code?
Here is a list of the UCUM units list
http://www.hl7.de/download/documents/ucum/ucumdata.html
2009/1/20 Andrew Patterson andrewpatto at gmail.com:
I was wondering if anyone had any
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:48:17PM +1100, Andrew Patterson wrote:
Now I realise this is pretty complex - for instance these are
some of the medication strengths strings listed for some Australian
medications..
0.3mg/mL (0.03%)
0.4mg-10.0mg-2.0mg/mL
0.54g-1.28g/10mL
0.375mg
1% w/w
1
Hi Andrew
The dm+d data model seems to me to provide some of this. From the dm+d data
model V2.3 from this page:
http://195.97.218.30/dmd_download.htm
pharmaceutical strength
The amount of ingredient substance (as identified by the attribute ingredient
substance identifier or basis of
12 matches
Mail list logo
